AnswersInGenesis.com did a review of theistic evolutionists positions. One unedited excerpt pertinent to this question is below. The paragraphs in italics of book quotations give succinct answers.
On the one hand, according to theistic evolutionists, young-earth
creationists make a mistake to read Genesis 1–3 in a literal sense. On
the other hand, they cannot consult science on questions of the nature
of the soul, spirit, and/or the mind to explain their moral sense and
awareness, for science cannot tell us anything about the existence of
entities that cannot be studied by their methods. I can put the
dilemma which theistic evolutionists create for creationists slightly
different. On the one hand, Scripture cannot make an appeal to
knowledge, unless sanctioned by science. If it does, then it must wait
until validated by or accepted by the methods of the scientific
community. This point is clearly implied by Collins when he said:
“Science is the only reliable way to understand the natural world...”
(Collins 2007, p. 6). But on the other hand, immaterial entities such
as God, the soul, spirit, and mind cannot be invoked to explain our
moral sense, because “methodological atheism” (to use Murphy’s words)
has already “discovered” that God, the soul, spirit, mind, self, I or
me do not exist (see, for example, atheist psychologist Steven Pinker
2002, pp. 31, 42). Here is how Murphy expressed her agreement with
methodological atheism:
[N]euroscience is now completing the Darwinian revolution, bringing the mind into the purview of biology. My claim, in short, is this: all
of the human capacities once attributed to the immaterial mind or soul
are now yielding to the insights of neurobiology... (N. Murphy 2006,
p. 88).
Elsewhere Murphy (1998) concluded that there is a “massive amount of
evidence” which suggests that we no longer “need to postulate the
existence of a soul or mind in order to explain life and
consciousness” (Brown, Murphy, and Malony 1998, p. 17).11 The real
reason why she and fellow theistic evolutionists found such “evidence”
in the neuro-sciences is very simple:
Immaterial souls just do not fit with what we know about the natural
world. We human persons evolved by natural selection...[which is] part
of the natural order, but immaterial souls are not” (Baker 2007,
p. 341).
From: https://answersingenesis.org/theistic-evolution/can-theistic-evolutionism-explain-the-origin-of-morality/
