5

I understand that the Anglican Church is trinitarian in belief. However, are there any known non-trinitarian apologists in the communion?

Any information both historical and present-day would be helpful for my studies.

  • 1
    What do you consider to be valid answers? Are you only after non-trinitarian theists, or are non-theists, deists, atheists etc also okay? – curiousdannii Nov 29 '16 at 3:58
4

Historically, there was a small group of Anglican clergy in the late 18th and early 19th centuries who became convinced believers in and exponents of the non-trinitarian Christian theology of Emanuel Swedenborg (1688–1772), but who, instead of separating from the Anglican Church, remained "non-separatists," continuing to serve as pastors of Anglican churches while preaching, teaching, and publishing Swedenborg's theology.

Among these were:

The Rev. Thomas Hartley (1709–1784)

Hartley was Rector of the Anglican church of Winwick, Northamptonshire, England from 1744 to his death in 1784. He became acquainted with Swedenborg in 1769, both corresponding with Swedenborg by letter and visiting him personally. He translated at least one of Swedenborg's works from Latin into English. Swedenborg's answer to nine questions on the Trinity and related subjects asked of him by Hartley was published posthumously, and remains in print today.

Sources:

The Rev. John Clowes (1743–1831)

Clowes was an Anglican clergyman who accepted the doctrines of Emanuel Swedenborg in 1773, the year after Swedenborg's death, and early in Clowes's pastorate as the first Rector of St. John's Anglican Church in Manchester, England. He was the most active of the Swedenborgian non-separatists who were Anglican clergy, translating a number of Swedenborg's works, publishing numerous books and pamphlets, and working indefatigably to spread Swedenborg's theology. Though he was brought up on charges of heresy, he was cleared of the charges, and remained the much beloved Rector of St. John's Church for sixty-two years until his death.

Sources:

The Rev. William Hill (1762–1804)

Biographical information on the Rev. William Hill is a little harder to come by. He was an Anglican clergyman from England who preached both in England and in America. Like Hartley and Clowes, he came to accept the non-trinitarian Christian doctrines of Emanuel Swedenborg while remaining in the Anglican communion.

Sources:

  • Life of Emanuel Swedenborg, by Nathaniel Hobart. Allen and Goddard: Boston, 1831, p. 165-167.
  • Higham, Charles. "The Rev. William Hill" in The New-Church Magazine, London, 1896, vol. 15, no. 180. (Card catalog listing here. I have not been able to find the full text online.)
  • Higham, Charles. "The Rev. Jacob Duché and the Rev. William Hill," in The New-Church Magazine, London, vol. 28, no. 336, pp. 541-545. (Card catalog listing here. I have not been able to find the full text online.)
6

The Anglican church in many places is extremely lax in disciplining or evicting those with heretical beliefs. Historical Anglicanism had no capacity for non-Trinitarianism, and even though the foundational documents of the Prayer Book and the 39 Articles are accepted to varying extents in various provinces, one of the foundations of the Anglican Communion called the Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral still affirms the ecumenical Trinitarian creeds. The sad reality is that many ministers and bishops have been allowed to keep their positions despite publicly teaching things which directly contract the creeds, the 39 Articles, and the Bible.

The most famous Anglican heretic is retired bishop John Shelby Spong, who rejects theism, the trinity, the virgin birth, miracles, prayer, and resurrection.

A 2014 YouGov survey of more than 1500 Anglican clergy in the UK found that 2% think God "is no more than a human construct." An earlier survey from 2002 of almost 2000 clergy found that more than 75% of Church of England clergy overall accept the Trinity, with the implication that more than 20% do not accept it in some way.

  • Most of this answer doesn't answer the question, but only expresses personal opinions about the policies of the Anglican Church. – Lee Woofenden Nov 28 '16 at 0:17
  • 5
    @LeeWoofenden It answers it with a specific example but also gives the general fact that the denomination lacks the ability or conviction to uphold its official doctrinal standards. Yes my opinion is that that is tragic, and I hope everyone would agree. Just because this site is academic in approach doesn't mean we don't have and have strong emotions about some topics. – curiousdannii Nov 28 '16 at 0:21
  • Emotion is fine. Opinion is fine. But they don't belong in answers on this site. You may disagree with the Anglican Church's historically liberal stance on doctrinal orthodoxy among its clergy and laity. But that has been its general stance. And the Anglican Church has the right to run its affairs as it wishes. Has the Anglican Church branded Spong a "heretic"? If not, such language has no place in an answer about the Anglican Church on this site. – Lee Woofenden Nov 28 '16 at 1:05
  • 2
    @Lee Well I've removed some of my commentary and added more references to surveys. I'll add more examples of individuals as I find them. Atheism though is of course relevant, for you have to be a theist to be a Trinitarian. – curiousdannii Nov 28 '16 at 1:39
  • 1
    @LeeWoofenden well I'd just note that that wikipedia page includes the Unity Church, which teaches that is "spiritual energy which is present everywhere and is available to all people". That kind of non-personal deity is prevalent among the kinds of Anglicans I've mentioned, and it's very much in the same family of thought as Spong, who has said "My basic creed is to say that since God is the source of life I worship by living." – curiousdannii Nov 29 '16 at 6:35
-1

Marcus Borg (1942-2015) was an Anglican New Testament scholar (not sure if that qualifies as "apologist"), who, strictly speaking, wasn't even a theist. He was a self-described "panentheist".

  • Was he a non-trinitarian apologist? I.e., did he argue against the Trinity of Persons? – Lee Woofenden Nov 29 '16 at 3:25
  • He argues against the personhood of God, so in that sense, yes. – Flimzy Nov 29 '16 at 14:23
  • @Flimzy if I follow your point, arguing against the personhood of God by default argues against multiple persons being an attribute of God? Did I grok that correctly? – KorvinStarmast Nov 29 '16 at 20:12
  • @KorvinStarmast: Exactly. – Flimzy Nov 30 '16 at 10:00
  • Panentheism and theism are not mutually exclusive, though panentheism and classical theism certainly are. Nor, however, are panentheism and trinitarianism mutually exclusive; see the following titles in the bibliography for this encyclopedia article: "Panentheism from a Trinitarian Perspective," "Panentheist Internalism: Living within the Presence of the Trinitarian God," "Kenotic trinitarian panentheism." – Mr. Bultitude Mar 2 '17 at 17:42
-2

I am going to answer this not as an academic, but as a lifelong Episcopalian. In the 1928 Book of Common Prayer, the final document is the Articles of Religion, also known as the Thirty Nine Articles. These are commonly attributed to Archbishop Thomas Cranmer. The First Article reads as follows:

Of Faith in the Holy Trinity

There is but one living and true God, everlasting, without body, parts, or passions; of infinite power, wisdom, and goodness; the Maker, and Preserver of all things both visible and invisible. And in unity of this Godhead there be three Persons, of one substance, power, and eternity; the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.

Even though Anglicanism is non-authoritarian compared to Roman Catholicism, this is a pretty non-negotiable statement. So even if some contemporary pastors in the Anglican Communion purport to be non-Trinitarian in belief, at least according the the original standards, the Anglican Church is decidedly Trinitarian.

So if these non-Trinitarian "apologists" you ask about claim to be Anglican, can they really be considered Anglican apologists? It's a little like asking if there are any non-Papist apologists in the Roman Catholic Church, especially when the first attribute listed to Anglicanism in the Thirty Nine Articles is a belief in the Trinity.

The fact that such a question can be taken seriously perhaps is an indication of the direction the Anglican Church has taken in departing from its founding ideas.

  • Tom, the last sentence adds nothing to this answer. Do you intend this answer as a frame challenge? – KorvinStarmast Nov 29 '16 at 20:14
  • This may be your sincerely held view of the matter. But it doesn't answer the question asked. The question recognizes that the Anglican Church is Trinitarian in belief, but asks if there are any non-trinitarian apologists in the communion, historically or in the present-day. – Lee Woofenden Nov 29 '16 at 22:20
  • The point I was trying to make, perhaps poorly, is that the nature of Anglicanism is to be Trinitarian, thus by deduction, if one is not Trinitarian neither is he/she Anglican. – Tom Dupree Nov 29 '16 at 23:35
  • What is a frame challenge? – Tom Dupree Nov 29 '16 at 23:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.