I am curious: do Catholics believe that bisexuality and asexuality are sins? I understand that they believe homosexuality is a sin, but I wonder about these orientations as well.

I ask this because of a specific incident where some Catholics I know told me that my asexuality is a sin and that they did not want to associate with me because of it. It seemed odd to me because all other Christians I know have no problem with it.

  • If you dislike my question, then by all means comment for clarification or if it is offensive.
    – Ferus Olin
    Jun 7, 2016 at 23:52
  • 8
    I'm not the downvoter, but the main issue here is that many Christians find it frustrating that people say they "dislike" homosexuals. Such Christians would say they think homosexual activity is sinful, but that they have no animosity toward homosexual people. Such Christians also would consider any sexual activity outside of marriage to be sinful, including that done by bisexual people, homosexual people, and heterosexual people. The matter of asexuality may be more nuanced, but marriage, and therefore sexual activity, is not typically considered mandatory for Christians. Jun 8, 2016 at 0:08
  • 2
    I'm sorry to hear that. Christians often do a poor job of separating sin from the person, whether it is sexual sin or not, but many recognize that they should strive to love all sinners (which, incidentally, means everyone). Regarding your question: if you asked if any Christian groups consider asexuality to be inherently sinful, that would fit better here, but I'm pretty confident that the answer will be "no" with the possible exception of tiny fringe groups. Asking about "dislike" is difficult, because it's a feeling that is difficult to define and often not admitted. Jun 8, 2016 at 0:29
  • 1
    I've updated your question title to match your question body, but this is still on track to be closed as "too broad" because there are different ways of understanding homosexuality within Christendom, even among those who broadly consider homosexuality sinful in some way. If the question I suggested in my previous comment isn't satisfactory, I hope you'll explain in more detail what you'd like to understand – for example, if you know the denomination of the Christians who said this about asexuality, you might ask about that denomination's beliefs on the subject. Jun 8, 2016 at 4:01
  • 1
    The apostle Paul did not marry and thought it good to not have a life consumed by lust. Seeing as how sexual abstinence is such a big part of many types of Christianities I don't really understand why anyone would think being asexual is a bad thing under a Christian worldview.
    – Neil Meyer
    Jun 8, 2016 at 8:32

1 Answer 1


From the Catholic perspective, the universal teaching is that all persons are called by God to chastity, which is understood as a successful integration, inner unity and rational expression of human sexuality, both within the person as well as in interpersonal relationships (CCC 2337).

The Church helps sinners in a variety of states of life—including those who are married, were previously married, or those who remain single or devote themselves to celibacy—by encouraging them to express chastity in different ways. Each of these is valued, including the friendships offered by and to those not in sexual relationships (CCC 2349 and 2350).

The Church does not teach that having a homosexual or bisexual tendency/orientation/attraction is itself sinful, as sin relates to choices and actions/behavior. However, all sexual acts that are not open to life—i.e., all sexual acts outside of heterosexual marriage—are understood as sinful because they are expressions of sexuality that lack one or more of the essential qualities of the type of sexual expression to which we are called as Christians. So sinful behaviors would include homosexual acts, heterosexual acts outside marriage, as well as acts that are not open to life, even when within a marital relationship. So the Church would most likely say that the bisexual person is called to chastity and to cultivate inner freedom in order to choose either celibacy or heterosexual marriage.

Above, I mentioned that celibacy and singleness are recognized as valid lifestyles, and there are many examples of Christians who are not inclined to marry, often those who remain virgins and/or enter religious life. Additionally, consider this passage of Jesus' teaching:

Matthew 19:8-12 Jesus replied, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.” The disciples said to him, “If this is the situation between a husband and wife, it is better not to marry.” Jesus replied, “Not everyone can accept this word, but only those to whom it has been given. For there are eunuchs who were born that way, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others—and there are those who choose to live like eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can accept this should accept it.”

Please note that the word eunuch is not restricted to those who are physically castrated, but can also include those not inclined to marry, and the passage also references those who choose to live like eunuchs. So in both these examples (Scripture and the Catechism), virginal or celibate life are promoted as valid and valuable expressions of one's sexual identity, and the church does not teach that all people should seek or participate in a sexual relationship.

So according to Catholicism, both the person who experiences a deep sexual attraction to members of both sexes, as well as the person who does not experience this type of sexual attraction toward either sex have the opportunity to live out either a sinful life or a chaste and holy life, depending on the type of behavior they choose to engage in.

Note: The church does teach that as part of being human, we all have a sexual identity (CCC 2333). It is possible that the case of someone who chooses to radically reject their own sexual identity, or the case of someone with a deeply wounded identity where the person is not able to bond or form healthy friendships might be considered problematic, but this does not appear to be what you are describing, and this would not likely be described as sinful.

The CCC references I've included are to the Catechism of the Catholic Church. If you are interested in learning more about what the church teaches about chastity and the nature of human sexuality, I'd recommend reading the first two sections of Article 6. You can easily search for these references online, or follow the links. Both sections together are only a few pages long.

  • Is there not a comment by the Apostle Paul that mentions that it is good to not marry like he did? Maybe also worth adding to your answer.
    – Neil Meyer
    Jun 8, 2016 at 8:36
  • 1
    @NeilMeyer Given the theme of this answer, that citation would not do much for this this answer. If it's that important a point, suggest that you address it in your own answer. Jun 8, 2016 at 11:56
  • @NeilMeyer Yes, 1 Corinthians 7. That chapter also shows the superiority of virginity over marriage.
    – Geremia
    Jun 10, 2016 at 3:59

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .