On one occasion, I heard someone prayer, "To God, our Father and Mother." In The Shack, the Trinity is represented as three persons, where God the Father is a woman.

Is there any biblical justification for referring to God as Mother?

Are there any denominations or movements which do call the first person of the trinity 'Mother'?

  • 3
    Hope you don't mind the edit. I'm trying to help it avoid this fate.
    – Richard
    Commented Dec 15, 2011 at 14:09
  • 6
    Also, there's always one of God's names: El Shaddai (loosely interpreted as "the breasted God")
    – Richard
    Commented Dec 15, 2011 at 14:11
  • 1
    I've seen some devotionals at my church (of 7 years ago, as I've moved since) where the daily prayers in the back started "Father and mother God" - my pastor failed to provide any biblical support for it, but also wouldn't say he disagreed with the idea. I didn't see the logic then, and I still don't.
    – corsiKa
    Commented Dec 15, 2011 at 16:40
  • It's an attempt by some pastors and Christians to be inclusive. Commented Dec 16, 2011 at 13:16
  • 2
    It's a realization that God isn't a human being, so of course He (;-)) has no gender. Commented Dec 23, 2011 at 21:41

6 Answers 6


There is a significant distinction between calling God "mother" and the Bible identifying aspects of motherhood (and fatherhood) as reflecting the glory and character of God.

Both men and women reflect the glory and character of God in different ways, as men and women, fathers and mothers, teachers, judges, etc.

However, God is spirit (John 4:23) and not physical. In the beginning, God created the physical universe, including genders. Yet, He Himself was not biological, but is and was outside of creation.

When He entered into creation, He did enter into it as a Man. In the Lord's prayer, God the Son instructs us to refer to God the Father as "Our Father" (Matthew 6:9-13). Nowhere in Scripture are we instructed to refer to God as mother.

The example of Paul is of note as well. He himself indicated that he cared for the Thessalonians like a mother cares for her children:

But we were gentle[c] among you, like a nursing mother taking care of her own children. 1 Thessalonians 2:7 ESV

But no one used that as a basis for calling Paul "Mom".

This in no way disparages women, and both men and women reflect the glory of God. Yet, God has chosen to reveal Himself in the masculine sense. If we are devoted believers, we recognize that He is the One who has the right to define how we should refer to Him--not us.


Isaiah 49:15 - Can a mother forget the child nursing at her breast? Yes, but even if she could, I would not forget you. See, I have engraved you on the palms of my hands.

As a practical matter, the case for "Mother God" tends to be made only by the more liberal wings of churches.

  • 2
    Good answer, reminds me of Matthew 23:37: "“O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing." Commented Dec 15, 2011 at 11:51
  • 2
    Hmm. Was Julian of Norwich a liberal? Admittedly I'm not sure that she had much in the way of Biblical basis for Jesus as Father, Mother, spouse, brother and Saviour. Commented Mar 21, 2014 at 21:30
  • 1
    @AndrewLeach Yes, yes she was. I mean, she was Catholic and Catholicism's pretty liberal. Commented Apr 2, 2015 at 1:41

I think the key to understanding this is to remember one thing:

God is not male...     ...and not female either.

"God is spirit, and the people who worship him must worship in spirit and truth.”

John 4:24 NET

However, it is worth further pointing out that scripture does exclusively use the male pronoun in reference to God.

  • Yes I agree.. God probably transcends gender. These are just ways in which we try to anthropomorphize some of his characteristics to better understand him/her/it
    – Neil Meyer
    Commented Dec 19, 2011 at 11:23
  • @Neil: did you just say that God is... transgender? ;-P Commented Dec 23, 2011 at 21:43
  • I think it's worth pointing out that some Christian churches, for example The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, teach that gender "is an essential characteristic of individual premortal, mortal, and eternal identity and purpose" (The Family: A Proclamation to the World). Therefore, God does have a gender, and is male. This would probably be lead to a different question: Is there biblical justification for God not having a gender? I'm going to look and see if that question has already been asked. Commented Jul 8, 2015 at 20:20
  • 1
    As written, even with the recent edit, this really doesn't answer the question, which asks whether there is a biblical basis for referring to God as Mother. Even if the answer intends to say, "No, there isn't," it doesn't make a solid enough case for its answer to qualify as a real answer. It reads more as opinion than as scholarship. Commented Jul 9, 2015 at 19:13
  • 1
    A quick edit should satisfy @LeeWoofenden's complaint.
    – user3961
    Commented Jul 9, 2015 at 19:19

The only biblical justification for calling God a mother would be to hyper-literalize passages like these:

Luke 13:34 ESV O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to it! How often would I have gathered your children together as a hen gathers her brood under her wings, and you were not willing!

Luke 15:8-10 ESV Or suppose a woman has ten silver coins and loses one. Doesn’t she light a lamp, sweep the house and search carefully until she finds it? And when she finds it, she calls her friends and neighbours together and says, “Rejoice with me; I have found my lost coin.” In the same way, I tell you, there is rejoicing in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner who repents.

Isaiah 49:15 ESV Can a woman forget her nursing child, that she should have no compassion on the son of her womb? Even these may forget, yet I will not forget you.

And an overwhelming percentage of Christians across all denominations view these passages as metaphorical. It's only the small, liberal, fringe-feminist Christian sects that choose to interpret these passages otherwise.

  • 1
    I think Luke 15 also contains a passage in which God is depicted as a woman. See also my comment on Affable Geek's answer. Commented Jan 27, 2015 at 15:29
  • 1
    @Wikis Hah, good point(s). You are on it.
    – LCIII
    Commented Jan 27, 2015 at 15:46
  • 1
    Hey! We may be a liberal fringe-feminist Christian sect, but Catholicism is hardly 'small'! Commented Apr 2, 2015 at 1:43

The first question is:

Is there any biblical justification for referring to God as Mother?

It is clear that in the cultures in which the Bible was written, God was overwhelmingly seen as male. Almost all of the language referring to God in the Bible addresses and refers to God as a male. And for Christians, there is the additional fact that Jesus Christ, who is "God with us," was a male human being.

For people in the cultures of the Bible writers, in which women were almost universally seen as inferior to men, to picture God as anything other than a male would have been to demote God to inferior status. (I'm not saying this is the reality; only that this is how it would have been viewed in those cultures.) So finding a biblical justification for referring to God as Mother will be slim pickings at best.

And yet, looking at the Bible from the perspective of present-day Western society, which has moved toward a position of considering men and women equal, the almost universal practice in the Bible of referring to God as a male becomes problematic. It implies that men are by nature superior to women, since God is male and not female.

This is the primary driver behind the widespread contemporary movement in liberal Christianity toward recognizing a female aspect of God, and referring to God not only as Father but also as Mother.

Can it be justified from the Bible?

Not very easily.

However, here are a few biblical indications not mentioned in the other answers so far:

So God created humankind in his image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. (Genesis 1:27)

Here the Bible says that both male and female humans are created in the image of God. This implies that both male and female characteristics are reflections of the nature of God.

The word here translated "humankind" is adam, which primarily refers to humanity generally (including both male and female human beings), though it can also be used to refer to a male human being. (The specific word for a male human being in Hebrew is ish.) Adam is, however, grammatically masculine, which causes it to take masculine adjectives, pronouns, and so on--hence the reading of "he created him," even though it includes both male and female humans.

For thus says the Lord . . . . As a mother comforts her child, so I will comfort you; you shall be comforted in Jerusalem. (Isaiah 66:12, 13)

Here YHVH (translated as "the Lord"), the God of the Hebrews, generally seen by Christians as God the Father, compares himself to a mother comforting a child. This suggests that God is not averse to being seen as a mother by us humans, who are God's children.

And one more passage in which God is seen as being like both a master (male) and a mistress (female):

As the eyes of servants look to the hand of their master, as the eyes of a maid to the hand of her mistress, so our eyes look to the Lord our God, until he has mercy upon us. (Psalm 123:2)

The philosophical response that "God has no gender" is foreign to the biblical text, which almost everywhere uses gendered language for God. The vast majority of that gendered language is male; a small minority of it is female. I'm not aware of any passage in the Bible stating or implying that God has no gender. If the intention is to move away from the idea of God as exclusively male, it is easier to support from the Bible the idea that God encompasses both genders than it is to support the idea that God has no gender.

The second question is:

Are there any denominations or movements which do call the first person of the trinity 'Mother'?

As asked, this question excludes my denomination, the Swedenborgian Church of North America, since we do not accept the doctrine of a Trinity of Persons in God. (See my article, "Who is God? Who is Jesus Christ? What about that Holy Spirit?")

However, if the question is broadened to ask, "Are there any denominations or movements which do call God 'Mother'?" I can respond from my denominational perspective.

Among Swedenborgians or "New Church" people historically, God has been seen primarily as male, as in other Christian denominations. However, doctrinally speaking, our church recognizes God not only as human, but as encompassing and having both male and female attributes, and as being the source of both male and female genders and characteristics.

Perhaps the clearest statement to this effect in the foundational doctrinal writings of our church is found in Sacred Scripture #67, by Emanuel Swedenborg (1688–1772), in which he is commenting on the commandment, "Honor your father and your mother":

People think of "father and mother" as their father and mother on earth, and all who serve as parent figures. They understand honoring father and mother to mean respecting and obeying them.

Spiritual angels think of God as their father and the church as their mother. They understand honoring them to mean loving them.

Heavenly angels think of God’s divine love as their father, and God’s divine wisdom as their mother. They understand honoring them to mean doing good things from God.

By "people" here Swedenborg means people living on earth. By "spiritual angels" he means angels of the second, or middle heaven. By "heavenly angels" he means angels of the third, or highest heaven (mentioned by Paul in 2 Corinthians 12:2).

In other words, according to Swedenborg, the highest angels, who are the wisest and the closest to God of all the angels, think of God's love as Father, and God's wisdom as Mother. This reflects Swedenborg's overall teaching that male and female, and the relationship between them, come from the love and wisdom in God--which Swedenborg sees as the core reality and being of God. (And note that he here reverses the usual assignment of love to female and wisdom to male--though at other times he sticks with the more traditional assignments.)

On this doctrinal basis, some contemporary Swedenborgians feel very comfortable addressing God as both Mother and Father.

If you are interested in a fuller presentation of some of these ideas from a Swedenborgian Christian perspective, I take it up in a sermon I preached some years ago, which I've now put online here: "The Mother of All the Living"

My congregation at the time was rather conservative. This sermon therefore created quite a stir among some of the older and more traditional members. Afterwards, one of the patriarchs of the church told me in no uncertain terms that he never again wanted to hear a sermon like that in his church! And yet, to some others in the denomination, that old sermon of mine seems quite tame. I say this to let you know that not all Swedenborgians are comfortable addressing God as Mother.

  • Your point on the female aspect of God's Wisdom is referenced with some frequency in the OT, and in the Book of Wisdom (which is in the original canon but not in the canon accepted by your denomination). Commented Sep 1, 2017 at 13:13

There is no biblical justification in the King James bible.

Matthew 6;9 After this mamner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name.

  • 4
    This does not answer my question. Of course the Bible refers to "Our Father". The question is whether that necessarily excludes Mother as a title for a God who has no gender (He is Spirit) Commented Mar 23, 2014 at 4:17
  • God has asked us to use "Our Father" when we pray. If we choose to do differently, we are saying his way is not good enough, and our way is better. Should not his will be done?
    – V. Rollins
    Commented Mar 29, 2014 at 4:59
  • Perhaps you should consider the feminine qualities that God has: prayertoday.org/NamesofGod/names/hen.htm
    – user3961
    Commented Jan 20, 2015 at 0:25
  • 1
    "There is no justification" seems like a legitimate answer to this question. Commented Jan 20, 2015 at 0:47
  • @V.Rollins I guess שְׁמַע יִשְׂרָאֵל יהוה אֱלֹהֵינוּ יהוה אֶחָד is blasphemy then. Commented Apr 2, 2015 at 1:49

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .