I'm sure there are many more names in the New Testament that no one would know, but this one strikes me as very odd.

The prophetess Anna is described in pretty good detail, for the Bible at least, but she doesn't do anything. She is described as:

the daughter of Phanuel, of the tribe of Asher.

Does his name give any credence to her story or her prophecy?

  • Again, at the risk of self-promotion, you may want to check out this sermon in which I talk about (a) who Anna was /wasn't - she was probably viewed as a homeless old crank, and (b) why that's important to understand in conjunction with "redemption" the one thing Anna was all about. Commented Dec 14, 2011 at 20:07

1 Answer 1


I don't think you'll get a definitive answer on this one. There's no other reference in Scripture, so there's nothing to cross-reference.

My hunch is that some people would and some wouldn't, the same way some people in my Church would know who Ray Comfort is, and some wouldn't.

It might simply be the habit of recording familial lines to avoid confusion with another Anna - this was Anna, the daughter of Phanuel, as opposed to another Anna.

I think that we have to assume that at least some (if not all) of the intended audience either was familiar with this person, or would be able to use the familial reference to determine the identity of this person.

Identification of a person as the "son of" or "daughter of" another person is a relatively common method of distinguishing individuals, not just in Biblical times, or even just in the Middle East. I've heard references like this from Scotland, England, and various other places, both in historical works and in literature. (I've even heard it in science fiction i.e. Worf son of Mogh.)

I believe that this was merely a common expression that most of the intended audience wouldn't think twice about.

  • 2
    I feel compelled to ask - who's Ray Comfort?
    – Waggers
    Commented Dec 14, 2011 at 7:14
  • 1
    @Waggers: It's the banana guy.
    – hammar
    Commented Dec 14, 2011 at 12:13
  • 2
    @hammar - that's true, but that's not how I first heard of him. The banana thing isn't what he's really known for, or at least what his primary mission is. He's more interested in fighting against what he calls "modern evangelism" (and what I'd call "easy-believe-ism") than creation/evolution. livingwaters.com/learn/hellsbestkeptsecret.htm (There are "listen to mp3" and "watch video" options to see his message, from him, for free if you really want to know what he's all about.) I have no affiliation, but I think he's got a point. Commented Dec 14, 2011 at 12:31

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .