0

I am a Muslim and I am trying to understand the Bible for educational purposes.

I've never known anything about the Bible apart from the fact that it exists. Now I have heard in many debates and Christian speeches of verses from The Old Testament and verses from The New Testament.

My question is simple, what is an overview of the differences between the Old and New Testaments? Are they still a part of the Bible?

Keep in mind I know nothing about Christianity so excuse me if my question doesn't make sense.

  • 2
    Welcome to the site! This is a really great and important question, but unfortunately it is currently opinion based, meaning there are way too many possible valid answers. With some editing, though, the scope can be narrowed and fit the guidelines of the site. I don't want this question to be closed :)! – LCIII Mar 30 '16 at 12:54
  • 1
    Welcome! The "versions" you are talking about (KJV, NIV) are different translations of the Hebrew and Greek texts, and due to differences in age and translation philosophy (more literal, less literal), they read differently. As for your bigger question, Wikipedia does a good job of describing both the Old Testament and New Testament. – Nathaniel Mar 30 '16 at 13:05
  • 1
  • 6
    I think as an 'overview' question it is not too broad to be answered. – Dick Harfield Mar 30 '16 at 20:51
  • 1
    Thanks for all your comments! The Wikipedia links were helpful to a certain extent, but @DickHarfield 's answer was pretty much what I was looking for :) – zain.ali Mar 31 '16 at 10:49
6

The Old Testament consists of books written by the Jews during the centuries before Jesus was born. It is believed to contain the entire history of the Jews all the way back to the creation of the world. The Old Testament is important to Christians because it is thought to include prophecies of Jesus.

The New Testament consists of additional books written by Christian authors, but not accepted by Jews as scripture. Four of these books, known as gospels, contain an account of the life of Jesus and another book, known as Acts of the Apostles, is believed to be a history of the early Church. Other books are letters, or epistles, believed to have been written by Christian apostles.

The Bible consists of both the Old Testament and the New Testament, following in that order. When discussing Judaism, Christians sometimes refer to the Old Testament as the Hebrew Bible, but Jews would call it the Tanakh.

  • NICE!! I think this is what I was looking for. A simple explanation of the OT and NT. I also looked on Wikipedia and got confused when it mentioned about the Jews and the OT, but you cleared that confusion for me so thanks @Dick Harfield – zain.ali Mar 31 '16 at 10:48
3

The following summary of the differences between the "Old" and "New" Testaments of the Bible reflects a fairly conservative Christian perspective. Furthermore, I am very likely typical of many conservative Evangelicals in that I believe the Old and New Testaments, though different in many key respects, are also complementary in many other key respects.

Unlike any other book in history, the Bible was

written by 44 authors over a period of about 1500 years. The 39 books of the Old Testament were composed between 1400 and 400 B.C., and the 27 books of the New Testament between A.D. 50 and A.D. 100 (see here).

Against all odds, God miraculously brought the seemingly disparate parts of the Bible together in stages over many years as true believers began to recognize and canonize the various books which comprise the one book we call today The Holy Bible. (To canonize is to declare officially, often through the convening of special councils of like-minded believers and leaders within the worldwide church, the various books of Scripture to be indeed God's word.)

First, Complementarity

According to many Christians who share my perspective, the primary reason the two testaments are complementary is because the Christian faith has its foundation in Judaism. Without Judaism and without the Jewish/Hebrew Scriptures (also known as the Tanakh) there would be no Christianity. After all, Christ himself was a Jew! Truly, the Christian religion reflects a Judeo-Christian heritage.

That is why Matthew, the author of the Gospel bearing his name, included a genealogy of Jesus Christ in the opening verses of his account of the life of Christ. Matthew goes all the way back to Abraham (the "Father of the Jews") in his three-part genealogy which consists of 42 generations altogether, with 14 generations for each of the three parts (see Matthew 1:1-17). Here is the summary of Matthew's genealogy:

So all the generations from Abraham to [King] David are fourteen generations; from David to the deportation to Babylon, fourteen generations; and from the deportation to Babylon to the Messiah, fourteen generations.

Second, Differences

Having introduced the idea of complementarity, we can go on to some significant differences between the two testaments:

  • Protestant Christians consider the Old Testament (hereafter, OT) to contain 39 "books" and the New Testament (hereafter, NT) 27 "books," for a total of 66 books. (Roman Catholic Christians generally include the books of the Apocrypha in their canon of Scripture, which brings the OT total to 46; combined, then, their Bible--such as the American Standard Version, or ASV--comprises 73 books.)

  • In terms of the sheer number of English letters in each Testament of the King James Version of the Bible (i.e., KJV), the OT would have 73 percent of the letters of the entire Bible, to the NT's 27 percent.

  • The original language of the OT is primarily Hebrew, though there are brief sections comprising Aramaic. The original language of the NT is common first-century Greek, or koine, a "lingua franca" dialect of Greek that developed primarily from Attic and became the common language of the Hellenistic world, from which later stages of Greek are descended. First century Rome (i.e., the Roman Empire) greatly admired ancient Greek civilization and sought to emulate in the postclassical Greek era what they considered to be the best of Greek culture. Interestingly, included in the NT are a few words and phrases from Hebrew and Aramaic.

  • There is much more variety as to genres in the OT when compared to the NT. Though the traditional Jewish/Hebrew categories for the OT Scriptures are three (viz., the Law, the Prophets, and the Writings), within that three-fold division are books of history (complete with genealogies galore!); wisdom literature, including a book of proverbs; a story about the rise and fall of Job, a wealthy believer in the one true God whose story pre-dates Abraham; books (or portions of books) covering moral, ceremonial, and civil laws for the children of Israel; poetry; songs; and much more. The NT is comprised primarily of four complementary accounts of the life of Christ; one book of the early history of the infant Christian church worldwide after Christ’s resurrection and ascension to heaven; numerous letters written by leaders in the first century church to local churches or to individuals within churches; and one book of prophecy which predicts in a highly symbolic way the eventual defeat of evil by God and the ushering in of a “new heavens and a new earth,” free forever from the effects of the presence of sin.

  • The OT lays the groundwork for what transpires in the NT. Many Christians believe that at the heart of the OT are many prophecies concerning the coming Messiah (from the Aramaic word məšiḥā, the anointed one, from məšaḥ, to anoint; or Hebrew māšîaḥ, anointed, from māšaḥ, to anoint), who would burst on the scene as the Savior not only of the Jews but also of the entire world, since God's covenant with Abraham included the promise that through Abraham "all [my emphasis] the families of the earth will be blessed" (see, for example, Genesis 12:3b). At the beginning of Jesus' public ministry at age 30, Jesus first reached out to his fellow Jews (whom he referred to as "the lost sheep of the house of Israel"--see Matthew 10:6 and 15:44), but when his fellow Jews largely refused to acknowledge his Messiahship, Jesus' message began slowly to extend to "all the families of the earth," just as God promised to Abraham. A classic example of this extended ministry involved a notoriously sinful Samaritan woman whom Jesus met at a well in her home country. The Jews of Jesus' day simply hated the "half-breed" Samaritans, but Jesus extended his acceptance, love, and forgiveness to her, much to the surprise of his closest disciples! Much later and particularly with the conversion of Saul of Tarsus, a "jihadist Jew" and "antichrist" if there ever was one(!), the Gospel message of forgiveness through the crucified and risen Christ of God spread well beyond Palestine, causing critics of the message to accuse Christians (or "followers of the Way") of turning the world upside down (Acts 17:6).

  • The primary difference between the central messages of the OT and NT can be summarized as follows: "Obey and you will live," versus "Live and you will obey." Despite the clear teaching of the OT that God counts faith in Him (or belief in Him) as righteousness (see Genesis 15:6, and compare to Romans 4:1-3 ff.), from a Christian perspective Jews throughout history have mistakenly thought (and taught) that obedience to the Law of Moses assures them of their acceptance by God. While God expected obedience from Israel to the 613 commandments of the Torah (particularly the moral law as found in the Ten Commandments), he also expected Israel to realize that perfect obedience is an impossibility. While the animal sacrifices and the many ceremonial laws in the Torah were an effectual--albeit temporary--means of forgiveness for Israel, from a Christian perspective they were but "types and shadows" of "the good things to come"; namely, Christ's once-and-for-all sacrifice on the cross for the sins of all humanity for all time, whether before or after the cross (see Hebrews 9:11 and 10:1). While there will always be a connection between "faith" and "works" (or orthodoxy and orthopraxy), from a NT- and Christian perspective, "good works" are the result of a "grounded faith," faith in the sufficiency of Christ's all-encompassing sacrifice for sins and his subsequent resurrection to eternal life, which he offers to all true believers in him.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while belief in the organic oneness of both Testaments, Old and New, may not be embraced even by many nominal Christians around the world (not to mention practicing Jews who do not accept the teachings of the New Testament), a significant number of Christians worldwide, myself included, believe in the complementarity and non-contradictory nature of the truth of God, wherever we find it, whether in the OT, the NT, other world religions or philosophies, or in the only person who ever lived who claimed to be truth incarnate; namely, Jesus of Nazareth (see John 14:6).

Those same Christians insist that there would be no NT without the OT, and that the self-revelation of God required that he reveal himself progressively through a small and seemingly insignificant people group, the Hebrews, and then climactically through his Son, Jesus Christ. As the author of Hebrews puts it,

God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many portions and in many ways, in these last days has spoken to us in His Son, whom He appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the world. And He [i.e., the Son] is the radiance of His [i.e., the Father's] glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power. When He had made purification of sins [on the cross], He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high . . . (1:1-3 NASB Updated).

  • Very useful - a good overview. – David White Mar 31 '16 at 23:11
0

You my neighbour have not asked an impossible question!

To begin just lay that Bible on a table in a closed manner, then place a blank sheet of paper to the left and right of that Bible. What you have setting in front of you is the history and future of mankind as we know it! The blank sheets are; on the Left = Eternity past before the creation of the world and to the Right = Eternity as the future, neither fully comprehended!

Now let us just open That Bible to Genesis 1:1 and begin reading about the creation from the beginnings! The beginnings are in the format of a seven day week; that is common to most of the world as an acceptable format. That week is a general overview outline of the entire Bible contents and message to all of mankind as the 7000 year plan of God; as The Creator, The Redeemer and The Enforcer of The Plan; a single plan that He has placed above His Name from everlasting to everlasting (Eternity past to Eternity future)! At this point I will only focus on the seven day weekly format!

1) First day as years prior to the flood! Reference pattern is Adam to Noah and the flood.

2) Second day as Noah after the flood to the tower of Babel and the confusion of languages.

3) Third day as Abraham is called out of the Er of Chaldea to the time of king Solomon.

4) Forth day from the kings of Israel to the time of Jesus The Messiah and the Gospels.

5) Fifth day is the beginning of the Church age to the middle of the dark ages.

6) Sixth day is the culmination of the modern Church Age as we are fairly close to that next major phase to be recorded in history! Also note; the woman (a type of The Church) was taken from man or mankind!

7) The seventh day is the completion of the 7000 year plan of God, as the compendium of The Book of Revelations and the Book of Daniel and the many other prophecies throughout scripture concerning “that Day”, etc.

To summarize the first three thousand years up to and near the end of the forth millennium; mankind had a problem called sin! No man is without this problem to this day! However during that Forth day of creation; the sun, moon and stars were created! The sun to give light by day and the moon to reflect that light at night and the stars; all to make distinctions of the seasons! The sun is a fore type of Jesus The Messiah as The Light of The World, the moon as a fore type of The Church (commonly called Christianity) to reflect The Light Of The World to the darkened world of mankind and the stars as the many witnesses to the story of His offer of Redemption to all of mankind; all brought into fruition by the sinless sacrificial life and physical death and Shed Blood of Jesus The Messiah on The Cross of Calvary!

He paid a debt He did not owe; and we owed a debt we could not pay!

It has been almost 2000 years since that offer of redemption and for me to try to further complicate your understanding and jeopardize the true lesson contained in The Bible! That Bible on your table has in it the detailed story of many fore types all pointing to the very season we are in at this time of the year. Israel calls the upcoming season Passover as Major Christian denominations just recently celebrated or will soon celebrate Easter. All point to Revelations 13:8 “… The Lamb slain from the foundation of the world!”

The simplest statement; The Old Testament points to The Cross where the New Testament remembers The Cross and looks forward to Our Heavenly Home.

  • 5
    I don't think this kind of dispensationalist framework would be very informative to a Muslim who knows almost nothing about the Bible or Christianity. And most of what you have written doesn't directly answer the question. The only thing you've written which explains the differences between the OT and the NT is "The Old Testament points to The Cross where the New Testament remembers The Cross and looks forward to Our Heavenly Home." – curiousdannii Mar 30 '16 at 23:32
  • Appreciate the answer Alan but @curiosdannii is right and it does seem a bit confusing for me. Sounds interesting though! – zain.ali Mar 31 '16 at 10:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.