4

I started to study the bible recently, and I wanted to buy a print copy of the American Standard Version. The bible is available online but I wanted a print version as a backup. To my surprise the bible is out of print. I looked online for print copies and only found one or two sellers. Why is this bible not widely available in print form? Is it because of the expired copyright? The KJV is in the public domain outside of the U.K and is available in print form. It is difficult to find a second hand copy as well, even though I understand that millions of copies were printed in the past.

  • Welcome to Christianity.SE, and thanks for taking the site tour. For more about what's on-topic here, see: What topics can I ask about here? I'm not sure your question fits into the intended topics of the site, but we'll see what others think, and what responses you get. I suspect, though, that the answer to your question involves the (low) level of demand for print copies of that particular translation of the Bible. – Lee Woofenden Mar 22 '16 at 15:03
  • I'm not sure why it's less available there... I do know there is a New American Standard Bible (NASB) that's really common here in the States. I do see it's available on the UK version of Amazon by 1 publisher, distributed by about 20 others, and of course there's print on-demand Bibles on AliBaba. – Vogie Mar 22 '16 at 16:26
5

The primary reasons that this translation is relatively difficult to find in hard copy are:

  • It was never especially popular to begin with
  • It was superseded many years ago by much more popular translations

Initial popularity

The ASV is based on the English Revision (1881–85), a version meant to revise the King James Version for use in the Church of England. However, people continued to prefer the King James, and so the English Revision was not particularly popular, and neither was its cousin the ASV (1901). H. L. Wilmington writes:

Although it enjoyed better permanent reception than the [English Revision], it still has not seriously cut into the lead of the King James Version. (Guide to the Bible, 809)

Interestingly, in part because of its use of the word "Jehovah," the ASV did achieve popularity with one group, the Jehovah's Witnesses.

Subsequent translations

The ASV's popularity declined even further as new translations appeared. The Revised Standard Version (1952) dropped the Elizabethan style of the ASV, making it more accessible. It was the first serious challenger to the KJV, and was used by Protestants and Catholics alike.

Not long after, other translations appeared based on the ASV. The New American Standard Bible (1971), for example, quickly displaced the RSV in conservative circles due to perceived textual issues, and it is still a top-ten Bible translation. Similarly, the Jehovah's Witnesses largely moved on to the New World Translation (1961).

Concluding thoughts

One of the main reasons people today use the ASV is due to its public domain status: it is freely available in many Bible software packages and online.

However, this popularity does not carry over to print copies. Relatively few used copies exist because the ASV failed to supplant the KJV early on, and it was largely replaced by more modern translations over 40 years ago.

Michael C. Armour, in A Newcomer's Guide to the Bible, describes how the ASV simply didn't find a niche—it is too different from the KJV for purists, but too similar to it for most modern readers:

Due to the great popularity of the King James Version, with its Elizabethan English, the translators of the ERV and the ASV felt they needed to retain the Elizabethan style. This decision, unfortunately, limited the period of time in which these two versions would be influential. Even though both were quite popular prior to the Second World War, neither is widely read any more. There style is too antiquated for most modern readers, and those who like the Elizabethan style have shown a preference to continue using the King James Version. (240)

| improve this answer | |
1

The lack of cross-references seriously hampered the acceptance, in the UK, of the RV : the issue in 1898 of a (very good) cross-reference edition came too late to increase wide acceptance.

The English Committee having dissolved itself soon after 1885, the American Committee alone issued the ASV in 1901, with improvements over the RV.

The revision of the ASV, originated in the USA, had planned to bring in UK involvement; but World War 2 intervened. Nelson's had financed the RSV, and wished it to be published as soon as possible; so, the RSV NT was issued in 1946, and the RSV NT in 1952.

Had there been resumed co-operation between the UK and the USA, probably in the form of a standing Anglo-American Revision Committee, we should have had a very much-improved RSV, probably with marginal readings and/or slightly different editions, where residual disagreement remained; and we might not have been faced with the fiasco of the following many versions. I say "might", because publishers must produce new translations in order to gain profit, and academics must issue new translations in order to gain kudos. All that was needed was an improved RSV, gradually and cautiously improved over time, by way of an enlarged and/or second margin. And, yes, publishers and academics have admitted as much, when I have questioned them.

The appalling consequence of the failure of the RSV has been the destruction of what the men of the nineteenth century, themselves keen to improve the AV/KJV, called "our common version". Alas! we now have no such version.

| improve this answer | |
  • Did you mean this as an extended comment on Nathaniel's answer or a standalone answer? You need some more reputation to provide a comment, but if you're entire assertion is that WWII was the reason it's hard to find a print version of the RSV, I think that's a good 'nuff answer. Could use some documentation to back up the assertion though (coincidence isn't necessarily enough, lots of things gained popularity during WWII, hula hoops for instance) . – Peter Turner Nov 11 '18 at 18:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.