6

I know that the Tridentine Mass was always said in Latin, but have there ever been exceptions to this rule? I heard that some exceptions were allowed, but have no known sources to back up this statement!

  • I would totally not be surprised if there was a rule far- predating Vatican II allowing Mass to be said in the original languages of Scripture, namely Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. – Robert Columbia Feb 16 '17 at 14:13
  • 1
    @RobertColumbia Take a look at this question: Tridentine Latin Mass in Hebrew? – Ken Graham Feb 16 '17 at 16:45
  • Thanks. But perhaps more to the point, very early Christians were overwhelmingly Aramaic and/or Greek speaking. It would have been absurd for there to have been a Latin-only rule at that time. Were Aramaic and Greek actually outlawed as Mass languages at some point (Middle Ages?) or was the actual rule more like "hey, we have enough languages already, no more translations plz kthx?" and everyone sort of agreed to stick with Latin as it was better known than the other authorized languages? – Robert Columbia Feb 16 '17 at 16:59
  • 1
    @RobertColumbia The Maronite Rite Traditionally is celebrated in either Aramaic or Arabic. In either case, Maronite Catholics employ Aramaic (the language spoken by Our Lord ) for the words of consecration. This Eastern Rite is the only Rite that has never been separated from Rome or the Roman Rite and is a great symbol of Catholic unity. The Tridentine Mass in Greek has always been permitted. – Ken Graham Feb 16 '17 at 17:30
7

If by “Tridentine Mass” the O.P. means the Mass promulgated by Pope Pius V in 1570 (probably better termed the “traditional Roman Rite”), which was used widely in that form until the liturgical reforms after Vatican II (and is still used to varying degrees today), then the answer is that it is basically only used in Latin, with a small number of exceptions that I am aware of.

Although the Council of Trent did not expressly forbid translating the Mass into the vernacular, it did emphatically assert that the Mass need not be celebrated in the vernacular:

Si quis dixerit … lingua tantum vulgari missam celebrari debere …: anathema sit.

If anyone should say … that the Mass should be celebrated only in the vernacular language …, let him be anathema (Session XXII, Canon 9, my translation).

In practice, however, the liturgical books were only issued in Latin; therefore, this Mass was very seldom celebrated in any language but Latin.

I am aware of one historical exception: in the regions that were part of the old Roman province of Dalmatia (basically modern day Croatia), the Mass was often celebrated in Old Slavonic (which is, however, more or less the Slavic equivalent of Latin).

Mention should also be made of the Missal used in Catholic Anglican ordinariates, published in 2015, which is very close to the traditional Roman Rite. This rite is based on some versions of the Anglo-Catholic liturgy that are, in turn, based on the old Roman Rite.

(Naturally, it is also possible that individuals translated the Mass and celebrated in the vernacular without authorization.)

6

Another exception to Athanasius' answer is Mass in the Ordinariate Use, published in Divine Worship: The Missal in 2015.

This order is in traditional-language English ("thee, thou" etc), and it's possible to construct an English-language Mass which is practically identical to the Traditional Latin Mass. We celebrate one such Mass weekly. There are some differences as there is quite a bit of the Sarum Use included, and even prayers from the Book of Common Prayer, but aficionados of TLM are satisfied.

The full text is not yet online to link to, unfortunately; and in fact the only printed edition is the one linked to above at £300 each. However, there is an altar card with some texts.

4

Portions of the liturgy were permitted to be celebrated in Native American vernaculars.

We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.

  • 1
    Welcome to Christianity SE! I hope you'll take the tour if you haven't already done so. Sadly, your answer, while apparently on target, isn't very useful to readers, because it does little more than point us to an external resource. We'd much prefer that you quote and summarize the relevant parts here, so that way the content of the answer is always available. Thanks! – Nathaniel Feb 15 '17 at 2:33
3

If we count the lawful liturgical variants of the Tridentine Mass such as the Dominican Rite and the Carmelite Rite and permission given to some Religious Orders, we able to see that the Holy See has given various indults for the Tridentine Mass to be celebrated in various languages.

Although Latin prevails in the West as a unified liturgical language, in the face of certain circumstances the Roman church has made exceptions to provide a language in the Liturgy more familiar to the people. It is in the ninth century among the Slavic nations that we find a departure from liturgical Latin in divine worship. A privilege was first granted to Sts. Cyril and Methodius, by Pope Hadrian II in 869, and again by Pope John VIII in 880 to use the vernacular (Slavonic) in the Liturgy.

Another example of the flexibility of which the Roman rite is capable is the privilege granted for the use of Chinese as a liturgical language. History records in the fourteenth century that the first Franciscan missionary to China, John of Monte Corvino, used the vernacular in the Liturgy.26 Pope Paul V, in a brief of June 27, 1615, granted the same privilege to Jesuit missionaries. As recently as 1949, the privilege to use the Chinese literary language in the Liturgy was granted by the Holy Office.

Still further concessions have been granted:

a) During the fourteenth century the Roman Liturgy in its Dominican variant was translated into Greek for use by the Dominican missionaries in Greece.

b) Permission had been granted to celebrate the Dominican Liturgy in the Armenian classical language in Armenia.

c) At the end of the sixteenth century missionaries of India of the Latin rite were allowed to celebrate Mass in Syriac.

d) In the seventeenth century the Discalced Carmelites were granted permission to use Arabic in their mission foundation in Persia.

e) In the seventeenth century the Theatine Clerics were granted permission to use Georgian or Armenian in their mission foundation in Georgia.

f) In the nineteenth century the Franciscans in the Holy Land were granted permission to use Arabic.

g) In 1958, an indult was granted India to use Hindi.

h) Five Latin priests in the Holy Land were granted permission to use Hebrew.

i) In 1959, the Holy See renewed Germany's privilege to use the vernacular (German) in the Epistle and Gospel after they are recited in Latin. - Liturgical Languages

Addendum:

Missale Romanum 1965

The official text of the Ordinary is from the Roman Missal with English translations approved by the National Conference of Bishops of the United States, published by authority of the Bishops' Commission on the Liturgical Apostolate.

NOTE: This was the official English version of the Order of Mass from the 1965 Roman Missal, published directly after the Second Vatican Council ended in 1965.This was the English Mass used from 1965 until 1969-70, w hen Paul VI promulgated the New Order of Mass (Novus Ordo Missae), and imposed it on the Latin Rite (the Novus Ordo is the current normative Mass of the Latin Rite).This interim Mass is much closer to the intended fruit of Vatican II's Sacrosanctum Concilum than the New Mass of 1970. It is essentially the Tridentine Latin Mass in English with minor modifications

Many rubrical similarities exist between the 1965 Missal and the New Mass of 1970.Obviously, an option for use of the vernacular exists in the1965.Furthermore, as in the Novus Ordo, it is at the discretion of the celebrant to either face the East ("ad orientem") or the people ("versus ad populum").An option for concelebration was also introduced in the 1965 (this was formerly restricted to Ordination Masses).The required Mass vestments were also simplified (e.g., optionality of the maniple).In 1967, the cope was supressed in the Asperges (rite of aspersion at High Mass).The chasuble was worn in its stead. The Canon was still required to be read inLatin until 1967, when it was permitted in the vernacular. - The Interim Missal

  • 1
    Was it granted to use English before Vatican II? – curiousdannii Apr 7 '17 at 14:38
  • 1
    @curiousdannii I am unaware of an English indult at the moment. – Ken Graham Apr 8 '17 at 8:54

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.