As I understand it, the Roman Catholic Church consists of a number of "particular churches" with separate liturgical traditions. For example, the Ruthenian and Hungarian Greek Catholic Churches use the Byzantine liturgy, the Armenian Catholic Church uses the Armenian liturgy, the Coptic and Ethiopian Catholic Churches use the Alexandrian liturgy, and so on.

Furthermore, individual Catholics are always enrolled in a particular church upon baptism, and though they may by necessity receive sacraments according to a different ritual church, adults cannot permanently transfer themselves to another such church except by marriage or by special dispensation from the Apostolic See. (See Can. 111–112.)

This brings me to my main question: Is a priest permitted to administer sacraments in a liturgy other than that of his own particular church? For example, could an Armenian Catholic priest celebrate a Byzantine mass? If so, could he do this whenever he wishes, or does he require exigent circumstances or special dispensation?

As a follow-up, is membership in the Latin Church currently a prerequisite for serving as Bishop of Rome (i.e., as pope)? If it is permitted to elect a non-Latin pope, would he be required to formally transfer to the Latin Church first and to perform all sacraments according to the Latin rite?

  • Good question and welcome to the Christianity SE! We are glad you are here.
    – ThaddeusB
    Commented Sep 15, 2015 at 14:11
  • I believe the answer will be different for each rite as to the reception of sacrements from other rites. I wait for a comprehensive answer.
    – Marc
    Commented Sep 15, 2015 at 16:13

1 Answer 1


There are a number of related questions here.

The Bishop of Rome

The Bishop of Rome (i.e., the Pope), being the universal pastor of the Catholic Church, may celebrate in any rite he wishes at any moment.

There is not a specific norm in the Canon Law (abbreviated CIC)—the law for the Western church—or the Code of Canons of Oriental churches (abbreviated CCEO)—the law for the Eastern churches), however Canon Law says,

The bishop of the Roman Church, in whom continues the office given by the Lord uniquely to Peter, the first of the Apostles, and to be transmitted to his successors, is the head of the college of bishops, the Vicar of Christ, and the pastor of the universal Church on earth. By virtue of his office he possesses supreme, full, immediate, and universal ordinary power [potestate] in the Church, which he is always able to exercise freely (CIC Can. 331; see also CCEO Can. 43).

The power (potestas) would include the license (permission) to celebrate the Sacraments in any rite.

There is also no restriction according to membership in a particular church as to who can be elected Pope: any bishop (indeed, in theory, any baptized, unmarried Catholic male) may be elected Pope. (If he is not a bishop, he would need to be ordained a bishop before he could become Pope.) CIC 332 says,

The Roman Pontiff obtains full and supreme power in the Church by his acceptance of legitimate election together with episcopal consecration. Therefore, a person elected to the supreme pontificate who is marked with episcopal character obtains this power from the moment of acceptance. If the person elected lacks episcopal character, however, he is to be ordained a bishop immediately (CIC 332§1).

Note that the CCEO uses precisely the same language in Can. 44, and that neither one makes a distinction among members of a particular church.

(As a historical note, Cardinal Grégoire-Pierre XV Agagianian, the Patriarch of the Armenian Catholic Church, was a serious contender for the papacy in 1958. See the corresponding Wikipedia article.)

Bishops and priests

The situation for bishops (other than the Pope) and priests is a somewhat more restricted.

Priests and bishops (those who do not otherwise have restrictions placed on them) are, of course, always able to celebrate the Sacraments according to the rites of their own Church: the Roman Rite (and some of the smaller rites in a few places, such as the Ambrosian Rite in Milan, Italy) for Western priests, and the rite of whichever church they belong to, for Eastern priests.

In general concelebrating in the Mass or Divine Liturgy of a rite that is not one’s own is allowed, provided the liturgical norms of the given rite are being followed and there is no syncretism (CCEO 701). (Priests and bishops, however, are never to concelebrate with priests or bishops not in communion with the Catholic Church, even if they are validly ordained—e.g., the Eastern Orthodox. See CCEO 702.)

For other cases, the bishop in charge of a diocese can give permission for priests (or bishops) of a different rite to celebrate the Sacraments in the bishop’s own rite, within his own diocese. (Actually, the bishop could grant permission to celebrate in any rite, but there is seldom any need to grant it outside his own rite.)

Evidently, the Pope himself, or else the patriarch or major archbishop of an Eastern church, could also grant that permission.

It should be noted that, because the Latin Rite is so ubiquitous, and often less difficult to learn, it is generally easier for Eastern priests and bishops to be given permission to celebrate in the Latin Rite than vice versa.

See “Celebrating in an Eastern Rite” by Fr. Edward McNamara, L.C., and the followup article.

The faithful

Note that, although bishops and priests should in general follow the rites of their own particular church in all the Sacraments, the faithful may freely receive the sacraments from any Catholic priest or bishop.

Of course, the Sacraments of Initiation—especially Baptism and Confirmation/Chrismation—should generally be done in one’s own church, but one may receive them in a different rite if a pastoral necessity arises. (For example, it is common for Eastern-rite Catholics to live in an area with no Eastern parishes nearby. In such a case, they could request to have their children baptized and confirmed at the local Western-rite parish. They would, however, still belong to their respective church.)

(As a side note, the Eastern churches technically do not celebrate Masses. They call their celebrations of the Eucharist Divine Liturgies. The term “Mass” comes from the Latin words of dismissal Ita, missa est, that are said by the deacon or priest at the end of every Mass—save the Mass of the Lord’s Supper on Holy Thursday—that is attended by faithful.)

  • Thanks for the detailed answer! You say that concelebration is permitted when there is no syncretism. Can you give an example of the sort of syncretism that might have to be avoided when Catholic priests from different ritual churches concelebrate?
    – Psychonaut
    Commented Sep 16, 2015 at 8:17
  • @Psychonaut For example, if Eastern Catholic priests are concelebrating at a Latin Mass, they should follow the prayers and rubrics of the Roman Rite. They should not add prayers from, say, the Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom (the normal Byzantine liturgy). Likewise, just because Latin clergy are concelebrating at an eastern Divine Liturgy, no Latin prayers should be introduced. The idea is: pick one rite and stick to it; don’t try mixing things up. Commented Sep 16, 2015 at 9:03
  • There are a small number of priests that are bi-ritual, meaning that they have the faculties to celebrated the sacraments in more than one Liturgical Rite.
    – Ken Graham
    Commented Mar 11, 2016 at 4:58
  • @KenGraham: How do bi-ritual priests obtain such faculties?
    – Psychonaut
    Commented Nov 29, 2017 at 14:42
  • @Psychonaut By special indult from Rome or the local bishop(s) in question. Some Jesuit priests are bi-ritual in the Latin Rite and an Eastern Catholic Rite because of the lack of Eastern Rite priests in some areas. Liturgical language plays a big part in this because a priest has to be fluent in more than one language.
    – Ken Graham
    Commented Nov 29, 2017 at 16:37

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .