The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has four "Standard Works" that are considered canonical:

  • The Bible (Old and New Testaments)
  • The Book of Mormon
  • The Doctrine and Covenants
  • The Pearl of Great Price

The Bible and the Book of Mormon are pretty much set in stone as to what they contain, but the other two standard works have changed over time as new revelations have been added over the past couple hundred years.

Two widely-cited official declarations from the past 20 years are "The Family: A Proclamation to the World" and "The Living Christ," but neither has been added to the standard works, despite a new edition of the standard works being published by the Church in 2013. Also, leaders address the Church every six months at General Conference – and while their addresses are universally regarded within the LDS Church as authoritative, they haven't been canonized.

Given that the LDS Church believes in living prophets, continuing revelation, and an open canon, how do they decide what becomes part of the canon?

1 Answer 1


It seems useful to consider the example of D&C Section 138. Section 138 was a revelation from 1918 but not added until 1981. A section from Sperry Symposium Classics: The Doctrine and Covenants from chapter 22 with the heading From Scripture to Canon describes a process which no doubt illustrates the general manner in which the leaders of the Church would undertake to update the 'LDS canon' as others may call it. The pertinent quote is:

At a meeting of the Council of the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve held in the Salt Lake Temple on March 25, 1976, approval was given to add to the Pearl of Great Price...

The answer is apparently that all 15 apostles approve such a change, and we can easily assume acting on prior consideration and after seeking inspiration from God.

  • Okay ... There's not more to it than this? Seems like there should be. Welcome to the site, btw.
    – user3961
    Commented Jun 9, 2015 at 19:26
  • 3
    Thanks. As indicated at the end, my assumption is that the more there is comes from God. But, as far as official procedure, that's all I've ever heard. Criteria for consideration isn't really addressed, except that, in the case of Section 138, it was documented as a vision from a prophet, and long considered like scripture. As far as the Proclamation - maybe we'll have to wait 50 years =]
    – zanlok
    Commented Jun 9, 2015 at 19:59
  • Good answer. It's also worth noting that there isn't a real structured division of "canon". Whether The Family: A Proclamation to the World is "canon" depends on the definition of that word. Unless you take canon to mean exclusively The Standard Works, which much more clear cut. Commented Jun 14, 2015 at 0:41
  • There is one step more than this. D&C 26:2, "And all things shall be done by common consent in the church..." All major changes in canon have been presented to the general body of the Church for a sustaining vote.
    – JBH
    Commented Jul 1, 2017 at 0:15
  • After thinking about this some more, I suspect one of the main criteria for something being considered might be, "does this contain something of doctrinal importance that isn't taught clearly in other standard works?" Something being inspirational, or even inspired, doesn't necessarily mean that it rises to the universal and timeless value of scripture. Commented Feb 4, 2021 at 2:39

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .