What were Martin Luther's main disagreements with the Catholic Church? Were these beliefs of Luther's and his disagreements with the Catholic Church the origin of the Lutheran Church?

  • @compman: That's a lot better, but the second part of the question is still so broad that I can't see it being easily answered here. You should stick to just the first part or a second part that is more closely related and a smaller scope like the edit I just suggested.
    – Caleb
    Aug 25, 2011 at 12:03
  • 1
    Of course this is a wide-ranging question, but there can certainly be a good answer: 1) a very brief overview and 2) references to more complete answers for further reading. Aug 25, 2011 at 13:19
  • I've asked a related question about the current disposition of Luther's disagreements with Pope Leo X. Apr 24, 2012 at 19:04
  • 2
    I know where you can read at least 95 of them. Apr 25, 2012 at 0:49

2 Answers 2


The Fundamental Change

So the question is: How did Luther change from a Catholic theologian to a Protstant theologian? Or to highlight more the historical aspect: How did he change from a late-scholastic to a reformer? Or a last variation: How did the early Luther change to the "old Luther"?

This leads us to a certain happening, to a conversion-like radical change in his life. What I'm talking about is the so called tower experience of Luther.

The Luther before this experience is the Luther of the monastery-struggles. With increasing progress he can not find inner peace – neither by the sacramental means of grace nor by monastic pastoral care. In light of the coming angry justice of God, that he was taught, he despairs.

Now Luther insists on trying to understand what that righteousness is. According to the doctrine of the Catholic Church at that time, this righteousness must be understood as a philosophical, formal and active righteousness. This means: God is righteous and punishes the sinner and unrighteous. Luther not only despairs, but even hates this doctrine.

In that situation, the above-mentioned tower experience can take place, since Luther discovers, that Romans 1:17, doesn't only say

For therein is the righteousness of God revealed

But rather has to be read in its context:

For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.

This makes Luther understand: The righteousness of God is this righteousness, which lets the just live by faith through God's gift. According to that Luther builds his understanding of righteousness inspired by Paul: it's passive and makes the sinner righteous by faith and not by any good work.

This is, what changes Luther from a Catholic theologian to a Protestant theologian.

From that point on, the Lutheran doctrine starts to grow.

Against Sale of Indulgence

He starts critisizing the sale of indulgences since they imply that righteousness can be reached by a good human work. According to Luther it can only by reached by faith in God, who makes the sinner righteous.

Against the Communion as a Sacrifice

For Luther the communion is a promise of God and not a sacrifice, like the Papacy has taught, as he says in his book The Misuse of the Mass (1521):

Sacrifice and promise are more apart from each other than east and west, rise and decline. A sacrifice is a work, that we give God, whereas the promise is God's word, which gives us God's grace and mercy. It is inconceivable how Gods promise could become a human sacrifice. [...] They give, but Christ promises the people. (WA 8, 512, 12 and 28)

And much more …

  • Against the Papacy
  • Against the free will (See one of his main works "De servo arbitrio")

A final word …

Luther was misused by some European principalities in the 16th century to shrink the popes and the Kaiser's influence. Against Luther's will it came to a schism, building of the Lutheran church and other confessions of Protestantism.

  • 2
    It is worth re-iterating Caleb's comment above as well; that Luther never set out to start a new church, which is why Lutheranism and Catholicism are compatible on many things. Aug 26, 2011 at 2:57
  • 1
    @Farseeker I'm not sure about that. In his "Morphologie des Luthertums" (Morphology of Lutheranism) Werner Elert points out, that Luther's reform of the curch was like their destruction and total abolution. He threw the CIC into fire ... Aug 26, 2011 at 8:10
  • @Farseeker Forget what I said. It looks like you're right :) Aug 26, 2011 at 8:43
  • 1
    Sweet summary, Karl.
    – user116
    Aug 28, 2011 at 13:02
  • @Farseeker: My comments above didn't take into account the whole span of time. He very certainly effected the start of a new church so (although I still argue he opposed it at first and didn't think that's the way it should have gone down) it's hard to argue about what ended up happening. Lutheranism and Catholicism are only compatible is so far as each has some measure of success in their pursuit of truth and following the one true savior not through any heroic motives of a man :)
    – Caleb
    Sep 9, 2011 at 9:22

The main disagreements between Luther's understanding of Christianity and the Roman Catholic church's teachings concerned the way in which we're counted righteous in God's sight, whether we have free will in our unregenerate state to respond affirmatively to God, and whether the Scriptures alone are the final authority to determine Christian doctrines. Luther held that the Christian church is dependent on Scripture as the Word of God, and that the papacy was based on a faulty understanding of various Scripture verses. Secondly he held on the basis of Scripture that conversion isn't something we can contribute to but is wholly the work of the Holy Spirit who enlightens with the saving knowledge of Christ who He will. And thirdly the way in which we become righteous in God's sight isn't through our own personal endeavours but is through God accounting us righteous because of our faith in Christ, who atoned for our sins.

In one of Luther's sermons he describes the situation that existed before he became acquainted with the truth which explains the darkness which people were living under prior to the Reformation:

….the miserable pope has contributed a great deal with his doctrines, ordinances, and laws, causing pious hearts to be greatly terrified by proclaiming that it is necessary to pray, fast, hear masses, make pilgrimages, and that it is a mortal sin if they fail to do this. Terrorized like this, nobody could know when enough is enough, because true comfort, forgiveness of sins through Christ, had disappeared completely. As a result people ran to St. James and tormented themselves with pilgrimages, fastings, and other works, to the point in my estimation that there could not have been a greater misery on earth. I myself have seen many who were unable to bear such deep anguish, on account of which they fell into despair through intense fear and terror, and were seized with horror before God's dreadful judgment. For by his preaching the pope had nearly succeeded in scaring us to death of Christ; we considered him to be a stern judge. I, too, had been one of those who expected Christ to be nothing more than a severe master, and as a result I called on the Virgin Mary to stand by me and be my advocate before this judge. Others did the same thing because that was all they knew. We all said, The judge is coming, the judge is coming; I have been a bad boy, help, dear Virgin Mary, otherwise there is neither comfort nor help nor counsel for my poor soul. That's how we babbled, and people did not know what else to do. For they had lost Christ, the true and only Saviour. (Pages 46,47, Vol V, Complete Sermons of Martin Luther, Baker Book House, 2007)

The Lutheran church came into existence because it proved impossible to reform the papist church. The latter continued to insist that it was truly Catholic and that Luther, and those who agreed with him, were heretics (instead of being in reality the true Catholics), so there was no other option but for Luther to separate from the church controlled by the popes. This then led to the formation of the Lutheran church (i.e. not to be confused with present day Lutheran churches which have diverged from Luther's teachings to a greater or lesser extent). Luther explained in his Table Talk why he separated from the popes:

The chief cause that I fell out with the pope was this: the pope boasted that he was the head of the church, and condemned all that would not be under his power and authority; for he said, although Christ be the Head of the church, yet, notwithstanding, there must be a corporal head of the church upon earth. With this I could have been content, had he but taught the Gospel pure and clear, and not introduced human inventions and lies in its stead. Further, he took upon him power, rule, and authority over the Christian church, and over the Holy Scriptures, the Word of God; no man must presume to expound the Scriptures, but only he, and according to his ridiculous conceits; so that he made himself lord over the church, proclaiming her at the same time a powerful mother, and empress over the Scriptures, to which we must yield and be obedient; this was not to be endured. They who, against God’s Word, boast of the church’s authority, are mere idiots. The pope attributes more power to the church, which is begotten and born, than to the Word, which has begotten, conceived, and borne the church. We, through God’s grace, are not heretics, but schismatics, causing, indeed, separation and division, wherein we are not to blame, but our adversaries, who gave occasion thereto, because they remain not by God’s Word alone, which we have, hear, and follow. CCCCLIII, Table Talk, translated by William Hazlitt.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .