8

We all know that IVF fertilization is against the catholic teaching. Recently I found out that when the treatment is carried out, some of the embryos are frozen for the future implantation in case if the couple want more children.

My question is: Do the catholic church allow couples to access the sacraments if they have children from IVF?

And if the couple realize the wrongness of IVF and have embryos frozen, what do they have to do with them according to the teaching? Let them die or try to implement them in woman's womb? Both, I see as wrong decision.

5

Starting with the second question, the Magisterial teaching of the Church likewise finds both decisions to be bad

All things considered, it needs to be recognized that the thousands of abandoned embryos represent a situation of injustice which in fact cannot be resolved. Therefore John Paul II made an “appeal to the conscience of the world’s scientific authorities and in particular to doctors, that the production of human embryos be halted, taking into account that there seems to be no morally licit solution regarding the human destiny of the thousands and thousands of ‘frozen’ embryos which are and remain the subjects of essential rights and should therefore be protected by law as human persons”

Dignitatas Personae - 19

And for the first question, I don't believe it's documented that a couple (or individual) receives a latae sententiae excommunication (automatic excommunication) for procuring IVF, but there is a good case to make for it on grounds that it is tantamount to abortion, which does receive that.

  • 1
    I believe that IVF's modern state of technology necessitates the destruction of some embryos. A source, but I can't vouch for it. – 3961 Dec 10 '14 at 0:03
  • @Peter it was over such issues regarding assisted fertility that my sister in law left the Church. And with the assisted implanting of embryos, conception happened and two children were the result. – KorvinStarmast Oct 11 '17 at 19:03
  • The artificial creation of life is not inherently wrong. But the methods used -- and the virtual certainty of the destruction of "unneeded" embryos -- are inherently wrong. A past answer on the subject – Andrew Leach Oct 12 '17 at 2:26
  • @AndrewLeach, can you back up your claim "The artificial creation of life is not inherently wrong"? – Grasper Oct 12 '17 at 11:19
  • @Grasper Yes. Part of the relevant CDF instruction is reproduced in the linked answer. – Andrew Leach Oct 12 '17 at 11:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.