13

I want to study different translations of Bible and compare them to Bible in Hebrew and Greek. Can any one tell me where can I find the pictures of original Biblical manuscripts online?

15

The original manuscripts are not believed to be in existence any more, and most manuscripts we do have aren't easily accessible. But some important ones can be viewed online:

Because there are so many manuscripts, most scholars rely on critical texts: the editors of these texts choose which variations they think are most likely to be authentic, and then in footnotes list the alternatives and which manuscripts support each. The most widely regarded critical text for the New Testament is the Nestle-Aland, whose text can be read online, but without the critical apparatus (footnotes). It looks like this:

A page from the Nestle-Aland 28th edition showing Matthew 1:1-10

  • Does NestleAland have OT/LXX? – Pacerier Dec 27 '18 at 13:27
  • I don't find the page that your image show – Pacerier Dec 27 '18 at 13:39
  • No the NA/UBS text is NT only. It shouldn't be hard to find that page, it's page 1! – curiousdannii Dec 27 '18 at 14:05
  • @Pacerier The standard critical version of the OT is the Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia (BHS), which you can get as a normal or reader's edition. It should be able to be read on Academic Bible but the link isn't working for me. – Alex Strasser Mar 7 at 7:26
  • @Pacerier The LXX should also be able to be read on Academic Bible, but is also not working for me now so here is another place you can read it. The Rahlfs-Hanhart is a semi-critical edition that developed into the Göttingen LXX (full critical) and then there is also the Cambridge LXX. Brief discussion on the different critical editions here. – Alex Strasser Mar 7 at 7:34
7

As others have said, the original manuscripts no longer exist. But the Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts is making an effort to photograph extant Greek manuscripts and make them available for study. Many of the manuscripts are fragments, but some are complete books of the New Testament. The photographs that are available online are high resolution.

Here is a sample: enter image description here

  • 3
    I hope every photo includes a thumb! – curiousdannii Oct 29 '14 at 9:35
  • @curiousdannii, meaning? – Pacerier Dec 27 '18 at 13:40
  • @outXast, where did the colors come from – Pacerier Dec 27 '18 at 13:40
  • @Pacerier I believe that the image is an example of an Illuminated Manuscript (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illuminated_manuscript). This sample is not particularly elaborate, but the colors were added to accentuate or decorate the text. It has been several years since I posted that image, and I am not sure from which particular manuscript it was taken. – outXast Dec 27 '18 at 22:47
2

With regards to Greek: There are many places you can find manuscripts as is mentioned in the other answers. One not mentioned before and very complete, although you need special perissions to get access to most manuscripts, is Institute for New Testament Textual Research (Institut für Neutestamentliche Textforschung, INTF)

BUT the best and easiest way for one person (as in less than a team of 50 people) to look at the greatest amount of manuscripts available would be to use something like the CNTTS database which is available in BibleWorks 9 and Accordance 10/11.

This shows all changes (as judged by the collators of course) between all the relevant manuscripts which have been collated by them at this point.

So it is subject to a few points though:

  1. Only a smaller fraction of the 5000+ manuscripts Dates of manuscripts have been collated.
  2. The dates given for manuscripts are subject to the judgment of the collators, so for instance they date the second century Peshitto much later following Wescott & Hort's theories.
  3. You won't find all the evidence for the text of the Holy Scripture only in the manuscripts, you'll need to look at a vast array of testimonies, such as Church Fathers (1 John 5:7), Versions (1 John 2:23b), Lectionaries (Last twelve verses of Mark).

Things like these. To get a good bearing on how to approach this world of textual criticism, read Dean John William Burgon's books.

  • The Revision Revised
  • A vindication of the last twelve verses of St. Mark
  • etc. freely available at the Gutenberg Project.
1

A lot of universities have high resolution scans of manuscripts that they may let you view. You may have to be a student though but it may be worthwhile to enter into conversations with your local universities Theology departments.

There is also museums that house ancient fragments. The John Rylands Museum in Manchester comes to mind. You can check that out.

1

You can look at some of the dead sea scrolls here http://www.deadseascrolls.org.il/featured-scrolls

1

Firstly, when you say the Hebrew bible that can mean a few things. The Tanakh? The Torah? The Talmud?. If you mean the Christian bible (old testament+new testament) then the Codex Vaticanus (300ad) and the Codex Senauticus (350-400ad) are the Oldest.
As others have mentioned there are fragments that are older such as Rylands Library Papyrus P52 about 100ad, Which is a fragment of John 18:31-33 and John 18:37-38. This particular fragment matches up extremely well with a modern King James almost verbatim. There are many other fragments as well that are Extremely old. Lastly, if you mean a Hebrew bible written as the Christian bible i.e. old+New testament there may be some in existence but they won't be near as old as the ones I mentioned above. Keep in mind the Apostles wrote the new testament in Greek (NOT Hebrew). If there are some old Hebrew versions they are unknown to scholars.

-1

Original manuscripts, you can't.

The Bible is riddled with alterations that have accrued and been passed down over thousand years. Nobody owns the actual original autographa of the books in the Bible you know of today. Even the oldest manuscripts found are still not original.

But still all these copied manuscripts can be studied, and compared.

Before you start my first recommendation is usually James Kugel's How to Read the Bible: A Guide to Scripture, Then and Now . It's an appropriate introductory text that gives most people a pretty good understanding of the general approach to biblical scholarship and to what degree scholars interact with the biblical texts.

  • 5
    "Riddled with" might be too strong a phrase. A more middle-of-the-road expression could be, e.g., "Minor variations have crept in over the years, which is to be expected in virtually any written communication passed on for thousands of years. According to many conservative scholars, however, there are few, if any, variations which drastically affect any major Christian doctrine in the Judeo-Christian Bible." Thank the Lord for translators down through the centuries who have done the heavy lifting in sorting through those variant readings, giving us a reliable--albeit imperfect--text! Don – rhetorician Oct 28 '14 at 12:39
  • 1
    I've given you a +1, assuming you didn't really mean to use the word "corruptions." Whether you soften the word, or not, is completely up to you. Don – rhetorician Oct 28 '14 at 12:40
  • 1
    Yeah, every religious book has no extant original manuscripts and has textual variants. This applies to the New Testament, the Tanakh, and the Qur'an. – user900 Oct 28 '14 at 22:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.