When and why was the practice of commixture started? What is the theological significance of mixing the two together?

1 Answer 1


The origins of this tradition can be found as early as 120AD in the practice of fermentum, whereby a piece of consecrated bread was broken off and sent to another community in another place for a separate - yet now connected - Eucharistic celebration, thereby expressing the unity of the Church through communion. (The Roots of the Catholic Tradition)

When this practice of traveling leaven was no longer taken up, a piece of the locally consecrated bread was dropped into the chalice and the tradition was explained through various allegory and metaphor, one of which being: this commixture symbolizes the reunion (resurrection) of Christ’s body and soul which were separated at the cross. (The Century Dictionary and Cyclopedia)

The actual word commixture and this notion that Christ essentially puts his power “on hold” before the resurrection, we find in The Life Hidden or Veiled by the Sacramental Species from Cardinal Cienfuegos (1657-1739):

This life Christ the Lord Himself as High Priest alone sacrifices and offers inasmuch as by the sway of His human will he suspends or removes the vital actions miraculously produced, and determines not to elicit any further action or to use the instrumental power of producing them according to His will, until by a kind of resurrection in the commemoration of the resurrection in the commixture of the body and the blood He resumes the actual life and free use of instrumental power.

In his book A History of The Doctrine of The Holy Eucharist, Vol. 2, Darwell Stone writes this of Cardnial Cienfuegos proposal:

Upon this opinion he built up a theory that in the Eucharistic sacrifices our Lord offers this life of the senses and suspends these vital actions until the mystical representation of the resurrection in the commixture of consecrated elements at the placing of a fragment of the host in the chalice; and that this suspension constitutes the sacrifice.

As you may have gathered, this tradition is not exclusive to the Orthodox tradition. It is practiced in the Catholic tradition (at least it was when I was an altar boy 45 years ago) and in the Episcopal tradition as well. (4)

  • There are actually a number of protestant traditions that do this, so it isn't particularly rare. Both my current and former non-denominational churches also took the bread and dip it in the wine or juice. Commented Jun 24, 2014 at 16:28
  • Good to know. Thanks. Though, this might have more to do with the integrity of the sacrament. Namely, that unless taken "under both kinds" the sacrament is not viable. (Luke 22:17, John 13:26) The question was asked specifically about the practice of commixture.
    – Stephen
    Commented Jun 24, 2014 at 17:22
  • 1
    @Stephen thank you for this very informative answer. It is very helpful. However, it seems to exclusively address the western tradition. I'm specifically interested in the point of view from the Orthodox church.
    – user5286
    Commented Jun 27, 2014 at 3:34
  • Is this different from the practice of intinction? Commented Feb 3, 2015 at 0:26
  • 2
    Yes. It is. Briefly: commixture (as expounded on here) takes place during the sanctification of the elements by the priest, before calling communicants to the table. While intinction - or "dipping" (to use a common phrase) - would take place when the individual communicant ingests the blessed elements at table.
    – Stephen
    Commented Feb 5, 2015 at 18:05

You must log in to answer this question.