4

What does this verse tell us? It's quite hard to understand.

Matthew 18:9:

“And if your eye causes you to sin, tear it out and throw it away. It is better for you to enter life with one eye than with two eyes to be thrown into the hell of fire.”

  • How can one tell the eye that causes the sin from the innocent eye. To tear out the wrong eye would be an even worse sin. This verse is very complicated. The root cause of the sin could be invisibly hidden. Good question. – gideon marx Dec 1 '13 at 19:37
  • 1
    You need to read Matthew 18:6-9. It's the temptation. If you are tempted to do something, the cause of the temptation needs to be eradicated so that you won't have the desire to do it again. E.g., it's better to be blind instead of constantly being allured to adult porn. That way, you lose the temptation of seeing it. This doesn't eradicate the hearing temptation, but you get the idea. Get rid of each temptation, one step at a time. – Buhake Sindi Dec 4 '13 at 1:07
  • 1
    It is a metaphor, to serve as a warning to Israel. But others don't read it this way, making the question opinion based. – Flimzy Nov 13 '15 at 21:14
5

Sin is not something we as Christians should fool around with. The same applies to non-Christians as well, for that matter. Consequently, we need to get tough with sin and tough with ourselves when it comes to nipping it in the bud.

Of course, a man could avoid lusting after a woman by blinding himself in both eyes, but such an extreme measure, interestingly enough, would not cure lust! I suggest that is why Jesus talked about plucking out one eye, not two.

It's pretty clear, to me at any rate, Jesus is using hyperbole, which is a figure of speech which exaggerates deliberately for best effect. If Jesus had said,

"If you are aware of what is causing you to sin, you need to have a little conversation with yourself in which you rebuke yourself and promise God you'll not sin again,"

His words would not have had the impact as would His words about eye-gouging. He knew that, of course, and He knew His words would cause His listeners to stop and analyze what they'd just heard, and in doing so they would've gotten the message. In essence, Jesus was saying

"Get tough on yourself. Make a clean break with sin and with anything that causes you to sin. What you thereby 'lose' for my kingdom's sake will be rewarded richly in the kingdom to come. If you refuse to make a clean break with sin, you may just find yourself in hell one day because of the very thing you refused to give up!"

Very sobering words, indeed, for believers and unbelievers alike. Sinful, earthly pleasures are but for a season, but at God's right hand in heaven, there are joy and pleasure forevermore (Psalm 16:11). In other words, a little pain now will yield eternal rewards. Our rejection of pain now will yield eternal regret in hell. The choice is ours to make.

Allow me to alter Jim Elliot's famous words ever so slightly:

"He is no fool who gives [up] what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose."

Jim Elliot, a missionary who sacrificed his life attempting to bring the gospel to a murderous tribe in the Amazon Rain Forest, was speared to death by the very people he came to serve (the Aucas). He was an eye gouger.

| improve this answer | |
  • Please correct me if I am wrong but if I follow your logic correctly you will refrain from sin (pluck out your eye) to get pleasure in heaven. Or to avoid punishment in hell. Is this what you are saying why all people should say no to sin? – gideon marx Dec 1 '13 at 19:56
  • 2
    Yes, but not quite as baldly as you put it. We need perspective. We can either underestimate the heinousness of sin in this life to our own detriment (temporally and possibly eternally) or we can get serious about our sin, realizing how it grieves God, and in so doing reap eternal rewards instead of the momentary pleasures of sin (Heb 11:24,25). That pleasure could come from promiscuity, taking vengeance, gossiping, slandering, loving money, having a short fuse, looking out for number one, and so on, but that kind of pleasure is short-lived and leaves us only wanting. On the other hand . . . – rhetorician Dec 1 '13 at 20:36
2

If your eye causes you to sin, tear it out means that we have to avoid all the conditions in our human body which leads to doing sins. When we read the scriptures, do not take it's physical meaning try to understand the spiritual meaning which is not visible directly to our brain. Our body parts are leading us to do sins so we have to control the organs under divinity. That is the meaning.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    Welcome to Christianity.SE. For a quick overview of what this site is about, please take the Site Tour. Thanks for offering an answer. Though this is an older question, these days Christianity.SE requires that answers state their denominational perspective, such as Catholic or Lutheran, rather than being individual perspectives and interpretations. For some tips on writing good answers here, please see: What makes a good supported answer? – Lee Woofenden Nov 15 '15 at 19:02
1

I could literally mean “And if your eye causes you to sin, tear it out and throw it away. It is better for you to enter life with one eye than with two eyes to be thrown into the hell of fire.”

That's fairly straightforward. Eternal intense, unimaginable, agonizing suffering, or temporary pain and blindness... The choice is yours.

Kind of puts the real requirements for goodness and holiness required of us by God into perspective. We all think "We're not so bad", but if you ever get a real understanding of God's requirements, you realize that there's no way we can attain to that level of perfection. None of us is good enough to get to heaven. Thankfully, He provided the lamb of God to pay the penalty for our sins, since we can't.

However, it is typically used as a hyperbole to make a principle clear:

If you have things in your lift that are causing you to sin, get rid of them. It's better to have temporary loss in this world than eternal loss. Love the things of God, and get rid of those things that are not Godly, that cause you to stumble.

Companion verse: John 12:25.

| improve this answer | |
0

In Matthew chapter 18 Jesus is covering Salvation and what it means and giving tips on how to live the Christian life.

In verse 9 did Jesus mean to physically gouge out your eyes? Probably not any more than when he told Nicodemus that he must be born again did mean to physically go back into the womb and start all over.

In both these incidents Jesus was referring not to a physical process, but a spiritual process.

consider:

Matthew 5:27 and 28 KJV

27 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery:

28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

What would seem more feasible is that Jesus was saying wickedness is not confined to actions, but that we must also clean up our minds. And in order to do that it is not going to be easy. Remember the old saying that it will cost an arm and a leg. The meaning there was that it was going to be really expensive, and in verse nine the connotation is probably similar.

| improve this answer | |
0

Matthew 18:3-9 (DRB)

3 And [Jesus] said: Amen I say to you, unless you be converted, and become as little children, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. 4 Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, he is the greater in the kingdom of heaven. 5 And he that shall receive one such little child in my name, receiveth me. 6 But he that shall scandalize one of these little ones that believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone should be hanged about his neck, and that he should be drowned in the depth of the sea. 7 Woe to the world because of scandals. For it must needs be that scandals come: but nevertheless woe to that man by whom the scandal cometh. 8 And if thy hand, or thy foot scandalize thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee. It is better for thee to go into life maimed or lame, than having two hands or two feet, to be cast into everlasting fire. 9 And if thy eye scandalize thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee. It is better for thee having one eye to enter into life, than having two eyes to be cast into hell fire.

The argument is quite simple (and very obviously not about literal mutilation—and was never understood that way):

  • Occasion (or, cause) of sin: in this instance, an intrument of temptation. Such must, necessarily be avoided, because sinning by them, you will lead yourself to Hell.

  • Punishment for letting an occasion of sin remain: in this instance, the Hell to which the sins committed due to said temptations or occasions of sin leads the sinner.

He doesn't mean (in my view) we will be in heaven nor hell maimed, necessarily: the teaching is hyperbolic. He is bringing to focus the cost of sin.

What is certainly not hyperbolic and the lowest common denominator of what He is trying to teach is that sin, if we do not avoid and make efforts to avoid it (removing occasions of sin, for example), will certainly lead us to Hell—the "than"s separate the only two options: Heaven or Hell. He even teaches the same thing twice with more examples, to drive the point through (with parallelism accounting for the two names for Hell: "hell of fire ['Gehenna']" and "everlasting fire").


This is what St. Paul refers to when he writes about putting to death the deeds of the flesh, otherwise "ye shall die:"

Romans 8:13 (DRB)

For if you live according to the flesh, you shall die: but if by the Spirit you mortify the deeds of the flesh, you shall live.

This is Jesus' characteristically hyperbolic teaching unpacked by St. Paul.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy