From Pelikan's first volume of The Christian Tradition:

[The Savior] is also a way of distinguishing between Gnostic and non-Gnostic species of 
Christianity, for one of the characteristics of Gnostic doctrine was its denial that the 
Savior was possessed of a material, fleshly body .... an explicit effort to protect the 
person of the Savior from involvement in matter and in suffering soon became a hallmark 
of most Christian Gnostics.

Is Docetism a necessary feature of the label "Gnosticism", and are all Gnostics necessary Docetist, or are there examples of Gnostics that were not Docetist?

If Docetism is a necessary feature of Gnostics, why is this so? Pelikan mentions that they were very concerned with preserving the conflation of the Savior with matter.


Short Answer: No, Docetism was not a necessary feature of Gnosticism (or even the Christian variety of Gnosticism.) It was however, a very popular solution for Gnostics, who necessarily held that God cannot interact directly with the material world.

Gnosticism held that the material world was evil and the spiritual world was holy. At first glance this might sound semi-Christian, but here are a few key implications of Gnosicism:

  • A holy God could not possibly have any association with the wicked material realm. Thus, He could not have created the physical realm, nor could He directly interact with it, let alone come and be encased in it.

  • The goal was to escape the physical realm (through the layers of intermediary states) to the spiritual realm. The idea of a physical resurrection was absolutely appalling to Gnostics. Why would you want to be raised back up into the disgusting, wicked, base elements that you had finally been freed from upon death?

Docetism was one way of reconciling Gnostic philosophy with Christianity. Yes, Jesus was God, they would say, but He most certainly was not a real, physical man. Nor did He die, and He most certainly did not raise up in a physical body.

Arianism (including Socianism) would be the other obvious solution for the Gnostic Christian. Yes, they would say, Jesus was a real man, but He most certainly was not God.

There were other fringe solutions as well, such as the idea that Jesus was something in between God and man, but Docetism and Arianism were by far the most prominent solutions.

  • Very nice @Jas31. I would slightly object to the assertion that Gnostics believed that God cannot interact directly with the material world. This is definitely true for Deists but not all forms of Gnosticism. For example some believe in a Christ conscious which anyone can obtain. Gnosticism isn't a formalized religion and has been created to group different beliefs together. Much like saying that all Pegans worship the same. Christians group Gnostics together by their very close similarities to Christianity (same religion but different understanding). Some groups accepted the label. Sep 24 '15 at 13:41
  • However, without righting a book to explain all of this, your answer is spot on. Sep 24 '15 at 13:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.