Exactly as the title says. What is the archaeological evidence that Sodom and Gomorrah existed and were destroyed by fire from the heavens (Genesis 19:24)?

  • This could be a prototype of Biblical archaeology question for Archaeology.SE proposal. – Pavel Feb 5 '13 at 15:23

The search for the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah have been a common archaeological pursuit over the years. There have been some proposals, and I do recall seeing a documentary about a couple such sites, near the Dead Sea, which may be very likely the Biblical cities stated. It is difficult to say for absolute certain whether these are the cities mentioned in the Bible or not, but there are some interesting arguments for their identification as such.

The documentary that I saw was on the History Channel, and mentioned the sites named Bab edh-Dhra and Numeira as candidates. They existed near each other and both were destroyed, somehow, around the same time.

There are other cities that have been proposed, however. You can see a quick writeup on Wikipedia here.

| improve this answer | |

It's worth noting that it would appear from the text that the Cities of the Plain (which include Sodom and Gomorrah) were destroyed by some type of meteor impact. If so, it's not likely that there was much left behind for modern archaeologists to find, especially considering the primitive state of construction technology back then.

If a meteor were to wipe out a modern metropolis, full of reinforced concrete and steel, I'd expect to be able to come back a few thousand years later and find evidence that there was once a city there. But a bunch of communities with buildings made of wood and clay wouldn't stand a chance of surviving an impact event with a kinetic yield measured in increments usually reserved only for describing nuclear weapons, even as ruins.

| improve this answer | |
  • Where are you getting meteor from? It says "fire" and "burning sulfur" in the translations I've read. – styfle Jan 11 '12 at 1:44
  • @Styfle: A big enough meteor impact would have a very similar effect to a nuclear explosion, fire and all. (See the Tunguska impact for an example, estimated at 10-15 megatons and responsible for severe fire damage to the nearby forests, whatever it didn't outright obliterate at least.) "Fire raining down from heaven" is exactly what it would look like to someone with no knowledge of astronomy. Granted, that doesn't explain the sulfur, but it fits the description of what happened quite well. – Mason Wheeler Jan 11 '12 at 2:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.