Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 15 at 3:10 comment added bob Let us continue this discussion in chat.
Jan 15 at 2:08 comment added user61679 What are your thoughts on my answer?
Jan 14 at 22:29 comment added user61679 I decided to offer an answer of my own here.
Jan 14 at 16:04 history edited bob CC BY-SA 4.0
added 389 characters in body
Jan 14 at 5:20 comment added bob @Mark Thanks, just checked it out.
Jan 14 at 4:29 comment added user61679 You will probably find this discussion thread of interest: Is Romans 1:19-20 philosophically sound?
Jan 14 at 4:25 comment added bob That and Romans 1 addresses the deliberate refusal by humankind to acknowledge God, suppressing the truth. So collectively we’ve shut our eyes to the truth about him made evident in nature.
Jan 14 at 4:17 comment added bob I do and I don’t. I do think it is at odds with philosophy being put forth as scientific theory that posits unfalsifiable scientific ideas about origins as all such things are really and truly outside of the realm of science; they’re matters of philosophy and religion, but we’re not being honest with ourselves about that today. That’s not to say that all of modern cosmology or paleontology is wrong, just that we’ve arrogantly gone too far and presumed to know what humankind cannot know without faith of some kind in something.
Jan 14 at 4:13 history edited bob CC BY-SA 4.0
added 14 characters in body
Jan 14 at 4:11 comment added user61679 Do you believe that Romans 1 is at odds with mainstream scientific views, such as abiogenesis and evolution? Usually these competing naturalistic scientific views are the reason why many skeptics are not persuaded by intelligent design arguments nowadays. There are also philosophical reasons, such as the problem of evil or the problem of divine hiddenness, that dissuade many from belief in God.
Jan 14 at 3:53 history edited bob CC BY-SA 4.0
added 120 characters in body
Jan 14 at 3:47 history edited bob CC BY-SA 4.0
added 120 characters in body
Jan 14 at 3:40 history answered bob CC BY-SA 4.0