2 deleted 73 characters in body
source | link

Hello fellow roman catholic!The Eucharist, celebrated at every Mass, connects us back to the last supper, uniting the celebrant priest to the High Priest, and the congregation to the witnesses of the institution of the Eucharist. So it seems to me that since we hold Consecrated Eucharist from every Mass to be the true body and blood of Jesus, we must hold the bread and wine at the last supper to be the body and blood of Jesus.

My understandingIn other words, since it is thus:truly Jesus's sacrifice at each mass, and not the priests, the priest can only consecrate the Eucharist insofar as Jesus does, and since he did so at the last supper, it must be valid.

  • The Eucharist, celebrated at every Mass, connect us back to the last supper, uniting the celebrant priest to the High Priest, and the congregation to the witnesses of the institution of the eucharist. So it seems to me that since we hold Consecrated Eucharist from every Mass to be the true body and blood of Jesus, we must hold the bread and wine at the last supper to be the body and blood of Jesus.
    • In other words, since it is truly Jesus's sacrifice at each mass, and not the priests, the priest can only consecrate the eucharist insofar as Jesus does, and since he did so at the last supper, it must be valid.

Besides all of this, Jesus said very clearly, as he held up the bread, "this is my body." And when Omnipotent/Omniscient God makes a declaration, unless he's actively lying, it must be true in some sense.

Hello fellow roman catholic!

My understanding is thus:

  • The Eucharist, celebrated at every Mass, connect us back to the last supper, uniting the celebrant priest to the High Priest, and the congregation to the witnesses of the institution of the eucharist. So it seems to me that since we hold Consecrated Eucharist from every Mass to be the true body and blood of Jesus, we must hold the bread and wine at the last supper to be the body and blood of Jesus.
    • In other words, since it is truly Jesus's sacrifice at each mass, and not the priests, the priest can only consecrate the eucharist insofar as Jesus does, and since he did so at the last supper, it must be valid.

Besides all of this, Jesus said very clearly, as he held up the bread, "this is my body." And when Omnipotent/Omniscient God makes a declaration, unless he's actively lying, it must be true in some sense.

The Eucharist, celebrated at every Mass, connects us back to the last supper, uniting the celebrant priest to the High Priest, and the congregation to the witnesses of the institution of the Eucharist. So it seems to me that since we hold Consecrated Eucharist from every Mass to be the true body and blood of Jesus, we must hold the bread and wine at the last supper to be the body and blood of Jesus.

In other words, since it is truly Jesus's sacrifice at each mass, and not the priests, the priest can only consecrate the Eucharist insofar as Jesus does, and since he did so at the last supper, it must be valid.

Besides all of this, Jesus said very clearly, as he held up the bread, "this is my body." And when Omnipotent/Omniscient God makes a declaration, unless he's actively lying, it must be true in some sense.

1
source | link

Hello fellow roman catholic!

My understanding is thus:

  • The Eucharist, celebrated at every Mass, connect us back to the last supper, uniting the celebrant priest to the High Priest, and the congregation to the witnesses of the institution of the eucharist. So it seems to me that since we hold Consecrated Eucharist from every Mass to be the true body and blood of Jesus, we must hold the bread and wine at the last supper to be the body and blood of Jesus.
    • In other words, since it is truly Jesus's sacrifice at each mass, and not the priests, the priest can only consecrate the eucharist insofar as Jesus does, and since he did so at the last supper, it must be valid.

Besides all of this, Jesus said very clearly, as he held up the bread, "this is my body." And when Omnipotent/Omniscient God makes a declaration, unless he's actively lying, it must be true in some sense.