Timeline for Distinction between Created Son and Begotten Son for Jehovah's Witnesses
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2023 at 3:13 | history | edited | Kristopher | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Jun 2, 2023 at 4:01 | history | edited | Kristopher | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Jun 30, 2022 at 22:03 | history | edited | Kristopher | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 426 characters in body
|
| Jun 25, 2020 at 10:52 | comment | added | Mike Borden | @Kris An article delviing into the notion of mo·no·ge·nesʹ carrying the meaning of same nature begottenness. It also traces the formal development of the "unique/only of it's kind" definition to the not so distant past. dennyburk.com/… | |
| Feb 11, 2020 at 22:17 | vote | accept | Mike Borden | ||
| Feb 11, 2020 at 19:13 | comment | added | GratefulDisciple | +1 for differentiating ideas related to Jesus's status: begotten, uniqueness, eternity. Also for differentiating different words / philosophical terms that try to capture the reality of Jesus like homoousia, nature, substance. I admit that personally I was taken aback when reading how evangelical Hebrew scholar Michael Heiser discards convincingly certain interpretation of Biblical verses used to show the begotten nature of Jesus to prove the Trinity by some Trinitarian theological systems, forcing evangelicals to rely on other Biblical support for Trinity. | |
| Feb 11, 2020 at 18:44 | history | answered | Kristopher | CC BY-SA 4.0 |