Timeline for How would miaphysites approach the question of monothelitism versus dyothelitism?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2022 at 23:01 | answer | added | Dan Fefferman | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 23, 2022 at 22:33 | history | edited | curiousdannii♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 11, 2020 at 13:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jul 12, 2020 at 12:20 | history | edited | curiousdannii♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 3, 2020 at 8:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Mar 4, 2020 at 7:01 | answer | added | R. Brown | timeline score: -1 | |
| Oct 23, 2018 at 18:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackChristian/status/1054794748186296320 | ||
| Jul 8, 2018 at 15:59 | comment | added | Nigel J | @ErikJörgenfelt The question never arises, for such is the Perfection of Unity within the Godhead that the will of God is never disparate. | |
| Jul 8, 2018 at 14:09 | comment | added | curiousdannii♦ | Have a read of Does the triune God have will by nature, or by persons?. If two wills implies (to you) two persons, then you're thinking of wills by person, but dyothelitism teaches will by nature. This is a good question, which I don't know the answer to. I've never adequately understood miaphysitism. | |
| Jul 8, 2018 at 14:04 | history | edited | curiousdannii♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 8, 2018 at 9:58 | history | edited | Erik Jörgenfelt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Removed obstructing language and attempted to clarify understanding of miaphysitism
|
| Jul 8, 2018 at 9:57 | comment | added | Nigel J | The answerability of your question on this site is not for me to say. But I think I have already answered the fact of it. Whether or not certain people consider this or that is for others to determine. I have simply agreed with the statement you made about the nature and person of Christ. | |
| Jul 8, 2018 at 9:52 | comment | added | Erik Jörgenfelt | @NigelJ Thank you for your guidance. As I said, I am unschooled in these matters, and I did not intend to present a false picture of miaphysitism. It is not the jargon that interests me, but rather whether miaphysites consider the Lord Jesus Christ to have two Wills. Are you saying that the question as it stands is un-answerable? | |
| Jul 8, 2018 at 9:42 | comment | added | Nigel J | You mention the 'perfect union' of the 'nature of Christ'. That union is a union of Divine Nature and human nature. It is not a mingling. They do not 'merge' for they are separate and distinct things. The 'union' occurs in the Person of Christ, Himself. It is important to keep the Person of Jesus Christ in view, by faith. Only by faith in Him, is his unique nature - a union of nature - perceived. Unbiblical and technical jargon is not the way to perceive the Lord Jesus Christ, sent of the Father. | |
| Jul 8, 2018 at 8:47 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 8, 2018 at 13:37 | |||||
| Jul 8, 2018 at 8:47 | history | asked | Erik Jörgenfelt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |