Timeline for Can Prince Harry marry his fiancée by the Church of England's precepts?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2018 at 14:18 | history | edited | DJClayworth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jan 3, 2018 at 0:50 | answer | added | davidlol | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 30, 2017 at 10:02 | vote | accept | luchonacho | ||
| Nov 29, 2017 at 14:19 | comment | added | Thunderforge | @davidlol Would you consider turning that into an answer? I think that Pauline Privilege is especially relevant here, and not all readers may be familiar with what it is, so having it fleshed our into an answer would be good. | |
| Nov 29, 2017 at 6:55 | comment | added | davidlol | Latest information is she is not RC, nor from a Catholic family, and is not baptised but soon will be by C of E. As she is unbaptised her previous marriage is irrelevant under the Pauline Privilege principle, and so when they wed they will do so as two Protestants, both C of E, neither of whom has been sacramentally married before. | |
| S Nov 29, 2017 at 3:52 | history | suggested | Thunderforge | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Correcting fiance -> fiancée in the title (Harry is the fiancé, Meghan is the fiancée); using the accented version of the word throughout
|
| Nov 29, 2017 at 3:19 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 29, 2017 at 3:52 | |||||
| Nov 29, 2017 at 0:02 | answer | added | curiousdannii♦ | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 28, 2017 at 23:58 | comment | added | curiousdannii♦ | There's lots of time for Meghan to join the Anglican Church. Being a divorced is a bigger matter, but it may matter less to the Queen as he is not expected to ever be king. | |
| Nov 28, 2017 at 16:50 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackChristian/status/935551505083654145 | ||
| Nov 28, 2017 at 16:37 | comment | added | Thunderforge | Note that there is also the matter of Meghan Markle being a divorcée with her ex-husband still living. This was an issue for Prince Charles marrying divorcée Camilla Parker Bowles, which led to them having a civil ceremony, rather than a religious one, with speculation that this was why Queen Elizabeth II did not attend the ceremony since she is the supreme governor of the Church of England (and Prince Charles is in line to become one). | |
| Nov 28, 2017 at 15:45 | answer | added | KorvinStarmast | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 28, 2017 at 15:14 | history | asked | luchonacho | CC BY-SA 3.0 |