Timeline for How does the Catholic Church respond to the claim that its authority to interpret scripture is based on circular reasoning?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2023 at 11:10 | comment | added | DJClayworth | It's no more circular than the Protestant argument that scripture is authoritative is based on circular reasoning. Without an authoritative church, your only reference for the infallibility of scripture is scrupture. | |
| Jun 17, 2020 at 8:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Feb 5, 2017 at 4:15 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackChristian/status/828094704952676352 | ||
| Feb 1, 2017 at 13:50 | comment | added | KorvinStarmast | catholic church (catholic meaning universal) is a term used to describe the church (Paul's church as body of Christ) from way back (it's in the Nicene Creed). The distinction between catholic and Catholic doesn't really get made until the Schism of 1054. You will find that catholic church (universal) is still in the Apostles' Creed which many Protestant denominations still hold as a shared statement of the faith. | |
| Feb 1, 2017 at 6:14 | answer | added | TheIronKnuckle | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 7, 2017 at 1:34 | history | edited | Andrew | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 16 characters in body
|
| Jan 7, 2017 at 1:30 | comment | added | Andrew | The quote is from a conversation that I was having with a friend. | |
| Jan 6, 2017 at 21:46 | history | edited | Nathaniel is protesting | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited tags; edited title
|
| Jan 6, 2017 at 21:36 | comment | added | Lee Woofenden | @Andrew If the second and third paragraphs are a quote, where does the quote come from? | |
| Jan 6, 2017 at 21:33 | comment | added | Lee Woofenden | I agree that it's not a duplicate. But as originally written it is perilously close to being a "truth question." I've made some edits to clarify that it is asking for a Catholic answer to the question. | |
| Jan 6, 2017 at 21:33 | history | edited | Lee Woofenden | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Changed it from a truth question to a scoped question
|
| Jan 6, 2017 at 21:07 | comment | added | Nathaniel is protesting | I don't think this is a duplicate, as it is asking for a Catholic apologetic against the "circular reasoning" claim, not the exegesis of Matthew 23:9. | |
| Jan 6, 2017 at 21:04 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 6, 2017 at 23:36 | |||||
| Jan 6, 2017 at 20:49 | comment | added | Geremia | Possible duplicate of What is the Roman Catholic view on Matthew 23:9? | |
| Jan 6, 2017 at 20:22 | history | edited | Ken Graham♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Some spelling improved and added two tags.
|
| Jan 6, 2017 at 20:22 | answer | added | cwallenpoole | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 6, 2017 at 19:47 | history | edited | Andrew | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 144 characters in body
|
| Jan 6, 2017 at 19:24 | history | asked | Andrew | CC BY-SA 3.0 |