deleted 2 characters in body
Source Link
Mr. Bultitude
  • 14.8k
  • 7
  • 71
  • 121

The key point of Luther's biblical exegesis was his conviction of Christ's being the rex scripturae.1. There is a famous passage from his preface to the "Epistel S. Jacobi und Judas" saying:

"ThisThis is the right touchstone to criticize all the books: See if they preach Christ or not. […] What Christ did not teach, that is not apostolic, may it have been taught by St. Peter or Paul. And what Christ did teach, that is apostolic, may it have been taught by Judas, Annas, Pilate or Herode."2

With this key exegetical principle, wherethat the doctrine of justification is paramount,3, Luther wonfound a critical measurestandard for the individual biblical writings. Thus he didn't think a lot of theThe Epistle of James,4, Second Maccabees, Revelation, and Esther did not meet that standard in his eyes. He was so hostile to them that he wished they didn't even exist: he wanted to "almost put them out of the bible."5

"almost put them out of the bible"5.



1: 40 I, 421
2: "Auch ist das der rechte prufsteyn, alle bucher zu tadelln, wenn man sihet, ob sie Christum treyben odder nit. […] Was Christum nicht lehret, das ist noch nicht apostolisch, wenns gleich S. Petrus oder Paulus lehret. Wiederum, was Christum prediget, das wäre aposolisch, wenns gleich Judas, Hannas, Pilatus oder Herodes tät", WADB 7, 384
3: And mainly the things that are taught in the Gospel of John, the Epistle to the Romans, and the First Epistle of Peter.
4: There's a dinner speech where he once said: "I'm going to heat up the oven with Jeckel [=Jakob=James]." ("Ich werdem einmal mit dem Jeckel den Ofen heizen."), Ti. 5,382,17
5: "schier aus der Bibel stoßen", Ti. 5,414

The key point of Luther's biblical exegesis was his conviction of Christ's being the rex scripturae1. There is a famous passage from his preface to the "Epistel S. Jacobi und Judas" saying:

"This is the right touchstone to criticize all the books: See if they preach Christ or not. […] What Christ did not teach, that is not apostolic, may it have been taught by St. Peter or Paul. And what Christ did teach, that is apostolic, may it have been taught by Judas, Annas, Pilate or Herode."2

With this key exegetical principle, where the doctrine of justification is paramount3, Luther won a critical measure for the individual biblical writings. Thus he didn't think a lot of the Epistle of James4, Second Maccabees, Revelation and Esther. He was so hostile to them that he wished they didn't even exist: he wanted to

"almost put them out of the bible"5.



1: 40 I, 421
2: "Auch ist das der rechte prufsteyn, alle bucher zu tadelln, wenn man sihet, ob sie Christum treyben odder nit. […] Was Christum nicht lehret, das ist noch nicht apostolisch, wenns gleich S. Petrus oder Paulus lehret. Wiederum, was Christum prediget, das wäre aposolisch, wenns gleich Judas, Hannas, Pilatus oder Herodes tät", WADB 7, 384
3: And mainly the things that are taught in the Gospel of John, the Epistle to the Romans, and the First Epistle of Peter.
4: There's a dinner speech where he once said: "I'm going to heat up the oven with Jeckel [=Jakob=James]." ("Ich werdem einmal mit dem Jeckel den Ofen heizen."), Ti. 5,382,17
5: "schier aus der Bibel stoßen", Ti. 5,414

The key point of Luther's biblical exegesis was his conviction of Christ's being the rex scripturae.1 There is a famous passage from his preface to the "Epistel S. Jacobi und Judas" saying:

This is the right touchstone to criticize all the books: See if they preach Christ or not. […] What Christ did not teach, that is not apostolic, may it have been taught by St. Peter or Paul. And what Christ did teach, that is apostolic, may it have been taught by Judas, Annas, Pilate or Herode.2

With this key exegetical principle, that the doctrine of justification is paramount,3 Luther found a critical standard for the individual biblical writings. The Epistle of James,4 Second Maccabees, Revelation, and Esther did not meet that standard in his eyes. He was so hostile to them that he wished they didn't even exist: he wanted to "almost put them out of the bible."5


1: 40 I, 421
2: "Auch ist das der rechte prufsteyn, alle bucher zu tadelln, wenn man sihet, ob sie Christum treyben odder nit. […] Was Christum nicht lehret, das ist noch nicht apostolisch, wenns gleich S. Petrus oder Paulus lehret. Wiederum, was Christum prediget, das wäre aposolisch, wenns gleich Judas, Hannas, Pilatus oder Herodes tät", WADB 7, 384
3: And mainly the things that are taught in the Gospel of John, the Epistle to the Romans, and the First Epistle of Peter.
4: There's a dinner speech where he once said: "I'm going to heat up the oven with Jeckel [=Jakob=James]." ("Ich werdem einmal mit dem Jeckel den Ofen heizen."), Ti. 5,382,17
5: "schier aus der Bibel stoßen", Ti. 5,414

This is linked to from the FAQ & should be well written. I *think* I've kept its meaning intact, but this suggested edit's reviewer should edit if needed! Note also: "won a critical measure" is still very unclear (to me), so much so that I don't know how to fix it.
Source Link

The key point of LuthersLuther's biblical exegesis was his conviction of ChristusChrist's being the rex scripturae1. There is a famous wordpassage from his preface to the "Epistel S. Jacobi und Judas" saying:

"This is the right touchstone to criticize all the books: See if they preach Christ or not. […] What Christ did not teach, that is not apostolic, may it have been taught by St. Peter or Paul. And what Christ did teach, that is apostolic, may it have been taught by Judas, Annas, Pilate or Herode."2

With this key exegetical principle, where the doctrine of justification is the highestparamount3, LutherLuther won a critical measure for the individual biblical writings. Thus he didn't think a lot of the Epistle toof James4, Second Maccabees, Revelation and Esther. They were himHe was so badly hostile, to them that wisheshe wished they didn't even exist: Hehe wanted to

"almost put them out of the bible"5.



1: 40 I, 421
2: "Auch ist das der rechte prufsteyn, alle bucher zu tadelln, wenn man sihet, ob sie Christum treyben odder nit. […] Was Christum nicht lehret, das ist noch nicht apostolisch, wenns gleich S. Petrus oder Paulus lehret. Wiederum, was Christum prediget, das wäre aposolisch, wenns gleich Judas, Hannas, Pilatus oder Herodes tät", WADB 7, 384
3: And mainly the things that are taught in the Gospel of John, the Epistle to the Romans, and the First letterEpistle of Peter.
4: There's a dinner speech where he once said: "I'm going to heat up the oven with Jeckel [=Jakob=James]." ("Ich werdem einmal mit dem Jeckel den Ofen heizen."), Ti. 5,382,17
5: "schier aus der Bibel stoßen", Ti. 5,414

The key point of Luthers biblical exegesis was his conviction of Christus being the rex scripturae1. There is a famous word from his preface to the "Epistel S. Jacobi und Judas" saying:

"This is the right touchstone to criticize all the books: See if they preach Christ or not. […] What Christ did not teach, that is not apostolic, may it have been taught by St. Peter or Paul. And what Christ did teach, that is apostolic, may it have been taught by Judas, Annas, Pilate or Herode."2

With this key exegetical principle, where the doctrine of justification is the highest3, Luther won a critical measure for the individual biblical writings. Thus he didn't think a lot of the Epistle to James4, Second Maccabees, Revelation and Esther. They were him so badly hostile, that wishes they didn't even exist: He wanted to

"almost put them out of the bible"5



1: 40 I, 421
2: "Auch ist das der rechte prufsteyn, alle bucher zu tadelln, wenn man sihet, ob sie Christum treyben odder nit. […] Was Christum nicht lehret, das ist noch nicht apostolisch, wenns gleich S. Petrus oder Paulus lehret. Wiederum, was Christum prediget, das wäre aposolisch, wenns gleich Judas, Hannas, Pilatus oder Herodes tät", WADB 7, 384
3: And mainly the things that are taught in Gospel of John, Epistle to the Romans, and First letter of Peter.
4: There's a dinner speech where he once said: "I'm going to heat up the oven with Jeckel [=Jakob=James]." ("Ich werdem einmal mit dem Jeckel den Ofen heizen."), Ti. 5,382,17
5: "schier aus der Bibel stoßen", Ti. 5,414

The key point of Luther's biblical exegesis was his conviction of Christ's being the rex scripturae1. There is a famous passage from his preface to the "Epistel S. Jacobi und Judas" saying:

"This is the right touchstone to criticize all the books: See if they preach Christ or not. […] What Christ did not teach, that is not apostolic, may it have been taught by St. Peter or Paul. And what Christ did teach, that is apostolic, may it have been taught by Judas, Annas, Pilate or Herode."2

With this key exegetical principle, where the doctrine of justification is paramount3, Luther won a critical measure for the individual biblical writings. Thus he didn't think a lot of the Epistle of James4, Second Maccabees, Revelation and Esther. He was so hostile to them that he wished they didn't even exist: he wanted to

"almost put them out of the bible"5.



1: 40 I, 421
2: "Auch ist das der rechte prufsteyn, alle bucher zu tadelln, wenn man sihet, ob sie Christum treyben odder nit. […] Was Christum nicht lehret, das ist noch nicht apostolisch, wenns gleich S. Petrus oder Paulus lehret. Wiederum, was Christum prediget, das wäre aposolisch, wenns gleich Judas, Hannas, Pilatus oder Herodes tät", WADB 7, 384
3: And mainly the things that are taught in the Gospel of John, the Epistle to the Romans, and the First Epistle of Peter.
4: There's a dinner speech where he once said: "I'm going to heat up the oven with Jeckel [=Jakob=James]." ("Ich werdem einmal mit dem Jeckel den Ofen heizen."), Ti. 5,382,17
5: "schier aus der Bibel stoßen", Ti. 5,414

deleted 4 characters in body
Source Link
DJClayworth
  • 28.6k
  • 4
  • 58
  • 118

The key point of Luthers biblical exegesis was his conviction of Christus being the rex scripturae1. There is a famous word from his preface to the "Epistel S. Jacobi und Judas" saying:

"This is the right touchstone to criticize all the books: See if they preach Christ or not. […] What Christ did not teach, that is not apostolic, may it have been taught by St. Peter or Paul. And what Christ did teach, that is apostolic, may it have been taught by Judas, Annas, Pilate or Herode."2

With this exegetical key exegetical principle, where the doctrine of justification is the highest3, Luther won a critical measure for the individual biblical writings. Thus he didn't thought alot aboutthink a lot of the Epistle to James4, Second Maccabees, Revelation and Esther. They were him so badly hostile, that wishes they didn't even exist: He wanted to

"almost put them out of the bible"5



1: 40 I, 421
2: "Auch ist das der rechte prufsteyn, alle bucher zu tadelln, wenn man sihet, ob sie Christum treyben odder nit. […] Was Christum nicht lehret, das ist noch nicht apostolisch, wenns gleich S. Petrus oder Paulus lehret. Wiederum, was Christum prediget, das wäre aposolisch, wenns gleich Judas, Hannas, Pilatus oder Herodes tät", WADB 7, 384
3: And mainly the things that are taught in Gospel of John, Epistle to the Romans, and First letter of Peter.
4: There's a dinner speech where he once said: "I'm going to heat up the oven with Jeckel [=Jakob=James]." ("Ich werdem einmal mit dem Jeckel den Ofen heizen."), Ti. 5,382,17
5: "schier aus der Bibel stoßen", Ti. 5,414

The key point of Luthers biblical exegesis was his conviction of Christus being the rex scripturae1. There is a famous word from his preface to the "Epistel S. Jacobi und Judas" saying:

"This is the right touchstone to criticize all the books: See if they preach Christ or not. […] What Christ did not teach, that is not apostolic, may it have been taught by St. Peter or Paul. And what Christ did teach, that is apostolic, may it have been taught by Judas, Annas, Pilate or Herode."2

With this exegetical key principle, where the doctrine of justification is the highest3, Luther won a critical measure for the individual biblical writings. Thus he didn't thought alot about the Epistle to James4, Second Maccabees, Revelation and Esther. They were him so badly hostile, that wishes they didn't even exist: He wanted to

"almost put them out of the bible"5



1: 40 I, 421
2: "Auch ist das der rechte prufsteyn, alle bucher zu tadelln, wenn man sihet, ob sie Christum treyben odder nit. […] Was Christum nicht lehret, das ist noch nicht apostolisch, wenns gleich S. Petrus oder Paulus lehret. Wiederum, was Christum prediget, das wäre aposolisch, wenns gleich Judas, Hannas, Pilatus oder Herodes tät", WADB 7, 384
3: And mainly the things that are taught in Gospel of John, Epistle to the Romans, and First letter of Peter.
4: There's a dinner speech where he once said: "I'm going to heat up the oven with Jeckel [=Jakob=James]." ("Ich werdem einmal mit dem Jeckel den Ofen heizen."), Ti. 5,382,17
5: "schier aus der Bibel stoßen", Ti. 5,414

The key point of Luthers biblical exegesis was his conviction of Christus being the rex scripturae1. There is a famous word from his preface to the "Epistel S. Jacobi und Judas" saying:

"This is the right touchstone to criticize all the books: See if they preach Christ or not. […] What Christ did not teach, that is not apostolic, may it have been taught by St. Peter or Paul. And what Christ did teach, that is apostolic, may it have been taught by Judas, Annas, Pilate or Herode."2

With this key exegetical principle, where the doctrine of justification is the highest3, Luther won a critical measure for the individual biblical writings. Thus he didn't think a lot of the Epistle to James4, Second Maccabees, Revelation and Esther. They were him so badly hostile, that wishes they didn't even exist: He wanted to

"almost put them out of the bible"5



1: 40 I, 421
2: "Auch ist das der rechte prufsteyn, alle bucher zu tadelln, wenn man sihet, ob sie Christum treyben odder nit. […] Was Christum nicht lehret, das ist noch nicht apostolisch, wenns gleich S. Petrus oder Paulus lehret. Wiederum, was Christum prediget, das wäre aposolisch, wenns gleich Judas, Hannas, Pilatus oder Herodes tät", WADB 7, 384
3: And mainly the things that are taught in Gospel of John, Epistle to the Romans, and First letter of Peter.
4: There's a dinner speech where he once said: "I'm going to heat up the oven with Jeckel [=Jakob=James]." ("Ich werdem einmal mit dem Jeckel den Ofen heizen."), Ti. 5,382,17
5: "schier aus der Bibel stoßen", Ti. 5,414

deleted 9 characters in body
Source Link
Karl von Moor
  • 1.4k
  • 11
  • 14
Loading
Source Link
Karl von Moor
  • 1.4k
  • 11
  • 14
Loading