Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackChristian/status/649027630088495104
Fixed up wording, capitalization, etc.
Source Link
Lee Woofenden
  • 8.6k
  • 9
  • 44
  • 86

Interpreting Is interpreting Noah's Flood As A Civilizationflood as a civilization-Wide Event Compatable Withwide event compatible with Roman Catholicism?

I had heard an idea a while back that perhaps the flood describesdescribed in the Old Testament wasn't necessarily a Globalglobal, Worldwideworldwide flood, but that it was a world-wideworldwide flood in a human civilizationhuman civilization sense. So essentiallyIn other words, it wouldn't have been necessary to flood the whole world wouldn't have needed flooding in order to accomplish God's purpose of destroying corrupt humanity because theyhumanity hadn't yet covered the whole world yet.

Is such a view compatible with the Catholic Church's teachings on Genesis?

(I know that the Church takes no position on some Old testament events)

Interpreting Noah's Flood As A Civilization-Wide Event Compatable With Roman Catholicism?

I had heard an idea a while back that perhaps the flood describes in the Old Testament wasn't necessarily a Global, Worldwide flood but it was a world-wide flood in a human civilization sense. So essentially the whole world wouldn't have needed flooding in order to accomplish God's purpose of destroying corrupt humanity because they hadn't covered the world yet.

Is such a view compatible with the Catholic Church's teachings on Genesis?

(I know that the Church takes no position on some Old testament events)

Is interpreting Noah's flood as a civilization-wide event compatible with Roman Catholicism?

I heard an idea a while back that perhaps the flood described in the Old Testament wasn't necessarily a global, worldwide flood, but that it was a worldwide flood in a human civilization sense. In other words, it wouldn't have been necessary to flood the whole world in order to accomplish God's purpose of destroying corrupt humanity because humanity hadn't yet covered the whole world.

Is such a view compatible with the Catholic Church's teachings on Genesis?

added 1 character in body
Source Link
Flimzy
  • 22.3k
  • 21
  • 106
  • 214

I had heard an idea a while back that perhaps the flood describes in the Old Testament wasn't necessarily a Global, Worldwide flood but it was a world-wide flood in a human civilization sense. So essentially the whole world wouldn't have needed flooding in order to accomplish God's purpose of destroying corrupt humanity because they hadn't covered the world yet.

Is such a view compatible with the Catholic Church's teachings on Genesis?

(I know that the Church takes no posiionposition on some Old testament events)

I had heard an idea a while back that perhaps the flood describes in the Old Testament wasn't necessarily a Global, Worldwide flood but it was a world-wide flood in a human civilization sense. So essentially the whole world wouldn't have needed flooding in order to accomplish God's purpose of destroying corrupt humanity because they hadn't covered the world yet.

Is such a view compatible with the Catholic Church's teachings on Genesis?

(I know that the Church takes no posiion on some Old testament events)

I had heard an idea a while back that perhaps the flood describes in the Old Testament wasn't necessarily a Global, Worldwide flood but it was a world-wide flood in a human civilization sense. So essentially the whole world wouldn't have needed flooding in order to accomplish God's purpose of destroying corrupt humanity because they hadn't covered the world yet.

Is such a view compatible with the Catholic Church's teachings on Genesis?

(I know that the Church takes no position on some Old testament events)

Source Link

Interpreting Noah's Flood As A Civilization-Wide Event Compatable With Roman Catholicism?

I had heard an idea a while back that perhaps the flood describes in the Old Testament wasn't necessarily a Global, Worldwide flood but it was a world-wide flood in a human civilization sense. So essentially the whole world wouldn't have needed flooding in order to accomplish God's purpose of destroying corrupt humanity because they hadn't covered the world yet.

Is such a view compatible with the Catholic Church's teachings on Genesis?

(I know that the Church takes no posiion on some Old testament events)