4 added 27 characters in body
source | link

Sources.... I explain a little in the comments. To continue: This site used to have a wonderful set of pages explaining a lot. It's from the National Catholic Holocaust Education Center. http://www.setonhill.edu/ncche/resources For the National Catholic Holocaust Education Center. Those pages were taken down. Revisiting Now revisiting the site today, I've never seen the current first article. It's a teaching guide that goes into a lot of detail. Here's one blurb from it:

Sources.... I explain a little in the comments. To continue: This site used to have a wonderful set of pages explaining a lot. http://www.setonhill.edu/ncche/resources For the National Catholic Holocaust Education Center. Those pages were taken down. Revisiting, I've never seen the current first article. It's a teaching guide that goes into a lot of detail. Here's one blurb from it:

Sources.... I explain a little in the comments. To continue: This site used to have a wonderful set of pages explaining a lot. It's from the National Catholic Holocaust Education Center. http://www.setonhill.edu/ncche/resources Those pages were taken down. Now revisiting the site today, I've never seen the current first article. It's a teaching guide that goes into a lot of detail. Here's one blurb from it:

3 added 52 characters in body
source | link

Sources.... I explain a little in the comments. To continue: This site hadused to have a wonderful set of pages explaining a lot. http://www.setonhill.edu/ncche/resources For the National Catholic Holocaust Education Center. It was taken Those pages were taken down. Revisiting, I've never seen the current first article. It's a teaching guide that goes into a lot of detail. Here's one blurb from it:

On the NT's descriptions not fitting properly into Jews having done it -- there are a number of sources as well. It was a big study & insight that shifted the Jewish-Christian relationship in the 50's, 60's... part of what fed into Vatican II. The Jewish Sanhedrin met and had rules that make the likelihood of it happening as described, as likely as the US Supreme Court deciding a landmark death penalty case in one of the judge's backyards on a Sunday after a BBQ with plenty of alcohol. The rules are in the Talmud & well-known in Jewish study. The application to the NT & working with Christians was very new.

To see the list of accusations at Jews, a good source is the Nazi favorite forgery book "The Elders of Zion," still motivates antisemitism today. I haven't read through, just skimmed. It's gross and irrational. A few sites with decent descriptions: -- well, I'm not allowed to post more than 2 links, so I'll post these in the comments below.

Sources.... I explain a little in the comments. To continue: This site had a wonderful set of pages explaining a lot. http://www.setonhill.edu/ncche/resources For the National Catholic Holocaust Education Center. It was taken down. Revisiting, I've never seen the first article. It's a teaching guide that goes into a lot of detail. Here's one blurb from it:

On the NT's descriptions not fitting properly into Jews having done it -- there are a number of sources as well. It was a big study insight that shifted the Jewish-Christian relationship in the 50's, 60's... part of what fed into Vatican II. The Jewish Sanhedrin met and had rules that make the likelihood of it happening as described, as likely as the US Supreme Court deciding a landmark death penalty case in one of the judge's backyards on a Sunday after a BBQ with plenty of alcohol. The rules are in the Talmud & well-known in Jewish study. The application to the NT & working with Christians was very new.

To see the list of accusations at Jews, a good source is the Nazi favorite forgery book "The Elders of Zion," still motivates antisemitism today. I haven't read through. It's gross and irrational. A few sites with decent descriptions: I'm not allowed to post more than 2 links, so I'll post these in the comments below.

Sources.... I explain a little in the comments. To continue: This site used to have a wonderful set of pages explaining a lot. http://www.setonhill.edu/ncche/resources For the National Catholic Holocaust Education Center. Those pages were taken down. Revisiting, I've never seen the current first article. It's a teaching guide that goes into a lot of detail. Here's one blurb from it:

On the NT's descriptions not fitting properly into Jews having done it -- there are a number of sources as well. It was a big study & insight that shifted the Jewish-Christian relationship in the 50's, 60's... part of what fed into Vatican II. The Jewish Sanhedrin met and had rules that make the likelihood of it happening as described, as likely as the US Supreme Court deciding a landmark death penalty case in one of the judge's backyards on a Sunday after a BBQ with plenty of alcohol. The rules are in the Talmud & well-known in Jewish study. The application to the NT & working with Christians was very new.

To see the list of accusations at Jews, a good source is the Nazi favorite forgery book "The Elders of Zion," still motivates antisemitism today. I haven't read through, just skimmed. It's gross and irrational. A few sites with decent descriptions -- well, I'm not allowed to post more than 2 links, so I'll post these in the comments below.

2 clarify wording
source | link

1) base itself off an older relgionreligion. At the time of the start of Christanity, age of a theology was that gave it validity. So claiming it's based in Judaism gave Christianity a fighting chance to get accepted.

Other people gave accurate answers. I hope this adds to them.


Sources.... I explain a little in the comments. To continue: This site had a wonderful set of pages explaining a lot. http://www.setonhill.edu/ncche/resources For the National Catholic Holocaust Education Center. It was taken down. Revisiting, I've never seen the first article. It's a teaching guide that goes into a lot of detail. Here's one blurb from it:

"In its quest to establish itself as the superior bearer of God’s Covenant, the early church interpreted the Christian Scriptures with three decidedly anti-Jewish themes. The church fathers claimed that according to scripture: 1. the divine election of the Jews as the chosen people of God had passed to the Christians, 2. that God had rejected the Jewish people, and 3. that the Jews were directly responsible for the death of Jesus (the charge of “deicide”)"

For my fifth item about the shift from religion to science, one of the many sources was the book "The Popes Against the Jews." It's written by a well respected historian who was let into the Vatican vaults to research for it. It only covered a limited sliver of concepts, but makes convincing arguments using original documents.

On the NT's descriptions not fitting properly into Jews having done it -- there are a number of sources as well. It was a big study insight that shifted the Jewish-Christian relationship in the 50's, 60's... part of what fed into Vatican II. The Jewish Sanhedrin met and had rules that make the likelihood of it happening as described, as likely as the US Supreme Court deciding a landmark death penalty case in one of the judge's backyards on a Sunday after a BBQ with plenty of alcohol. The rules are in the Talmud & well-known in Jewish study. The application to the NT & working with Christians was very new.

On antisemitism being about projecting on morality, it's something I heard recently, but it gives a summary to it that fits completely. http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/183033/israel-insider-guide?fb_comment_id=fbc_710619675659231_711027128951819_711027128951819#fecd11f44fbbe

To see the list of accusations at Jews, a good source is the Nazi favorite forgery book "The Elders of Zion," still motivates antisemitism today. I haven't read through. It's gross and irrational. A few sites with decent descriptions: I'm not allowed to post more than 2 links, so I'll post these in the comments below.

1) base itself off an older relgion. At the time of the start of Christanity, age of a theology was that gave it validity. So claiming it's based in Judaism gave Christianity a fighting chance to get accepted.

Other people gave accurate answers. I hope this adds to them.

1) base itself off an older religion. At the time of the start of Christanity, age of a theology was that gave it validity. So claiming it's based in Judaism gave Christianity a fighting chance to get accepted.

Other people gave accurate answers. I hope this adds to them.


Sources.... I explain a little in the comments. To continue: This site had a wonderful set of pages explaining a lot. http://www.setonhill.edu/ncche/resources For the National Catholic Holocaust Education Center. It was taken down. Revisiting, I've never seen the first article. It's a teaching guide that goes into a lot of detail. Here's one blurb from it:

"In its quest to establish itself as the superior bearer of God’s Covenant, the early church interpreted the Christian Scriptures with three decidedly anti-Jewish themes. The church fathers claimed that according to scripture: 1. the divine election of the Jews as the chosen people of God had passed to the Christians, 2. that God had rejected the Jewish people, and 3. that the Jews were directly responsible for the death of Jesus (the charge of “deicide”)"

For my fifth item about the shift from religion to science, one of the many sources was the book "The Popes Against the Jews." It's written by a well respected historian who was let into the Vatican vaults to research for it. It only covered a limited sliver of concepts, but makes convincing arguments using original documents.

On the NT's descriptions not fitting properly into Jews having done it -- there are a number of sources as well. It was a big study insight that shifted the Jewish-Christian relationship in the 50's, 60's... part of what fed into Vatican II. The Jewish Sanhedrin met and had rules that make the likelihood of it happening as described, as likely as the US Supreme Court deciding a landmark death penalty case in one of the judge's backyards on a Sunday after a BBQ with plenty of alcohol. The rules are in the Talmud & well-known in Jewish study. The application to the NT & working with Christians was very new.

On antisemitism being about projecting on morality, it's something I heard recently, but it gives a summary to it that fits completely. http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/183033/israel-insider-guide?fb_comment_id=fbc_710619675659231_711027128951819_711027128951819#fecd11f44fbbe

To see the list of accusations at Jews, a good source is the Nazi favorite forgery book "The Elders of Zion," still motivates antisemitism today. I haven't read through. It's gross and irrational. A few sites with decent descriptions: I'm not allowed to post more than 2 links, so I'll post these in the comments below.

1
source | link