Skip to main content
31 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:56 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://christianity.stackexchange.com/ with https://christianity.stackexchange.com/
Dec 6, 2014 at 4:54 comment added user13992 @Hello Please see footnote 2.
Dec 2, 2014 at 22:36 history edited user13992 CC BY-SA 3.0
Added link to Dissent from Darwinism and note to the interesting read linked.
Dec 2, 2014 at 22:28 history edited user13992 CC BY-SA 3.0
Added note to the interesting read linked.
Dec 2, 2014 at 21:03 history edited user13992 CC BY-SA 3.0
Following @MattGutting edit.
Nov 17, 2014 at 1:28 history edited user13992 CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 1 character in body
Nov 17, 2014 at 1:09 history edited user13992 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1 character in body
Nov 17, 2014 at 0:00 history edited user13992 CC BY-SA 3.0
Edited answer.
Nov 16, 2014 at 23:48 comment added user13992 @BenjaminHoogterp Please see my answer above. FYI.
Nov 16, 2014 at 23:17 history edited user13992 CC BY-SA 3.0
Brought the answer to the beginning.
Nov 16, 2014 at 18:31 history edited user13992 CC BY-SA 3.0
Body.
Nov 16, 2014 at 18:23 history edited user13992 CC BY-SA 3.0
Body
Nov 16, 2014 at 9:56 history edited user13992 CC BY-SA 3.0
On the section summarizing the Church's position.
Nov 16, 2014 at 9:45 history edited user13992 CC BY-SA 3.0
Link to my answer to "What is the Catholic Church's position on the scientific theory of evolution?"
Nov 16, 2014 at 5:48 comment added user13992 @waxeagle PS Worth noting that all scientific findings are phrased as theories. - Incorrect.
Nov 16, 2014 at 4:21 comment added user13992 @waxeagle What gives a theory legs is its verifiability. E.g. Einstein's general relativity correctly accounts for the "anomalous" precession of the perihelion of Mercury which Newton's equations could not explain.
Nov 16, 2014 at 4:11 comment added wax eagle Worth noting that all scientific findings are phrased as theories. To scientists saying Evolution is a theory is the same as saying that Newton's laws are theories. Are they subject to evaluation and interpretation, sure! (see: relativity). Are they something that scientists have any doubt about at all? not so much. The use of the word "Theory" is science for "something we understand well enough to say we're sure"
Nov 16, 2014 at 3:33 history edited user13992 CC BY-SA 3.0
Interesting reading link.
Nov 16, 2014 at 3:19 history edited user13992 CC BY-SA 3.0
Ending section.
Nov 12, 2014 at 9:09 history edited user13992 CC BY-SA 3.0
Added Pope Pius XII Encyclical Humani Generis (1950), 36.
Nov 12, 2014 at 8:57 history edited user13992 CC BY-SA 3.0
Selected answer is wrong as regards Church Teaching.
Nov 12, 2014 at 7:40 history edited user13992 CC BY-SA 3.0
Because the selected answer is incorrect.
Sep 7, 2014 at 8:16 history edited user13992 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 9 characters in body
Sep 7, 2014 at 8:09 comment added user13992 @tom Darwin himself gives me cause for pause ...
Sep 7, 2014 at 0:05 comment added tom Not to start an internet flame war, but this is a very hard line for a Christian scientist to take in the year 2014. Perhaps if you could explain the vestigial GULO gene in human DNA, or the merged chimpanzee chromosomes, or even the plethora of endogenous retro viruses. I don't know if fellow Christians are aware of just how strong an evidence base they are dismissing.
Sep 3, 2014 at 21:22 history edited user13992 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 13 characters in body
Sep 3, 2014 at 21:17 history edited user13992 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 13 characters in body
Sep 3, 2014 at 21:10 history edited user13992 CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 4 characters in body
Sep 3, 2014 at 20:45 history edited user13992 CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
Sep 3, 2014 at 20:32 history edited user13992 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 7 characters in body
Sep 3, 2014 at 20:19 history answered user13992 CC BY-SA 3.0