2 Good answer, but erroneous claimed that SDAs deny the divinity of Christ. I've removed that part and clarified it.
source | link

Michael the arch angel.

One thing we have to keep in mind is that the word "angel" is also the word "messenger" in both Greek and Hebrew. Whether it's a living human messenger or a spirit entity that was not created to have a biological form (disembodied saints are also called "angels" - John runs into one of these in the book of Revelation. John bows down to this angel and the angel tells him to get up. "I'm your fellow servant, of your brothers the prophets...") we can usually tell by the context of the verse.

The only two angels that I'm aware of that are named are Gabriel and Michael. Michael is called an "arch angel" and Gabriel is just called Gabriel.

Now when we dissect the names, Michael is made up of two different words and comes out to mean "who most assuredly is God". So thus the justification people have for equating Michael to Christ. I don't necessarily think this is a wrong interpretation, since Christ is the "arch" (chief) messenger of the gospel.

So when we look at all the passages were Michael is named, this does seem to fit. "But I will shew thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and there is none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your prince." Jesus is the prince of peace and none holds us but Him. So that fits.

Da 12:1 And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book. This one fits too. Who is the great prince that stands for the children of (God's) people? The mediator of the covenant; that's Christ.

Jude 1:9 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.

Re 12:7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,

These two fit too. Who better qualified to answer Satan than Christ and who better to lead the armies of the host of heaven. Revelation also portrays Christ as a conqueror on a white horse. So that all fits together too.

Where the Jehovah's Witnesses and SDA get in trouble though is where they deny the divinity of Christ and say he's just a created being, like an angel. They miss the point of both the meaning of the name Michael and also that an angel is simply put, a messenger.

SDA's, however, do believe in the divinity of Christ.

Interestingly though, Gabriel means "God man". So is Gabriel another depiction of Christ? I don't know? He only shows up in the book of Luke around the time of the incarnation.

Michael the arch angel.

One thing we have to keep in mind is that the word "angel" is also the word "messenger" in both Greek and Hebrew. Whether it's a living human messenger or a spirit entity that was not created to have a biological form (disembodied saints are also called "angels" - John runs into one of these in the book of Revelation. John bows down to this angel and the angel tells him to get up. "I'm your fellow servant, of your brothers the prophets...") we can usually tell by the context of the verse.

The only two angels that I'm aware of that are named are Gabriel and Michael. Michael is called an "arch angel" and Gabriel is just called Gabriel.

Now when we dissect the names, Michael is made up of two different words and comes out to mean "who most assuredly is God". So thus the justification people have for equating Michael to Christ. I don't necessarily think this is a wrong interpretation, since Christ is the "arch" (chief) messenger of the gospel.

So when we look at all the passages were Michael is named, this does seem to fit. "But I will shew thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and there is none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your prince." Jesus is the prince of peace and none holds us but Him. So that fits.

Da 12:1 And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book. This one fits too. Who is the great prince that stands for the children of (God's) people? The mediator of the covenant; that's Christ.

Jude 1:9 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.

Re 12:7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,

These two fit too. Who better qualified to answer Satan than Christ and who better to lead the armies of the host of heaven. Revelation also portrays Christ as a conqueror on a white horse. So that all fits together too.

Where the Jehovah's Witnesses and SDA get in trouble though is where they deny the divinity of Christ and say he's just a created being, like an angel. They miss the point of both the meaning of the name Michael and also that an angel is simply put, a messenger.

Interestingly though, Gabriel means "God man". So is Gabriel another depiction of Christ? I don't know? He only shows up in the book of Luke around the time of the incarnation.

Michael the arch angel.

One thing we have to keep in mind is that the word "angel" is also the word "messenger" in both Greek and Hebrew. Whether it's a living human messenger or a spirit entity that was not created to have a biological form (disembodied saints are also called "angels" - John runs into one of these in the book of Revelation. John bows down to this angel and the angel tells him to get up. "I'm your fellow servant, of your brothers the prophets...") we can usually tell by the context of the verse.

The only two angels that I'm aware of that are named are Gabriel and Michael. Michael is called an "arch angel" and Gabriel is just called Gabriel.

Now when we dissect the names, Michael is made up of two different words and comes out to mean "who most assuredly is God". So thus the justification people have for equating Michael to Christ. I don't necessarily think this is a wrong interpretation, since Christ is the "arch" (chief) messenger of the gospel.

So when we look at all the passages were Michael is named, this does seem to fit. "But I will shew thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and there is none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your prince." Jesus is the prince of peace and none holds us but Him. So that fits.

Da 12:1 And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book. This one fits too. Who is the great prince that stands for the children of (God's) people? The mediator of the covenant; that's Christ.

Jude 1:9 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.

Re 12:7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,

These two fit too. Who better qualified to answer Satan than Christ and who better to lead the armies of the host of heaven. Revelation also portrays Christ as a conqueror on a white horse. So that all fits together too.

Where the Jehovah's Witnesses get in trouble though is where they deny the divinity of Christ and say he's just a created being, like an angel. They miss the point of both the meaning of the name Michael and also that an angel is simply put, a messenger.

SDA's, however, do believe in the divinity of Christ.

Interestingly though, Gabriel means "God man". So is Gabriel another depiction of Christ? I don't know? He only shows up in the book of Luke around the time of the incarnation.

1
source | link

Michael the arch angel.

One thing we have to keep in mind is that the word "angel" is also the word "messenger" in both Greek and Hebrew. Whether it's a living human messenger or a spirit entity that was not created to have a biological form (disembodied saints are also called "angels" - John runs into one of these in the book of Revelation. John bows down to this angel and the angel tells him to get up. "I'm your fellow servant, of your brothers the prophets...") we can usually tell by the context of the verse.

The only two angels that I'm aware of that are named are Gabriel and Michael. Michael is called an "arch angel" and Gabriel is just called Gabriel.

Now when we dissect the names, Michael is made up of two different words and comes out to mean "who most assuredly is God". So thus the justification people have for equating Michael to Christ. I don't necessarily think this is a wrong interpretation, since Christ is the "arch" (chief) messenger of the gospel.

So when we look at all the passages were Michael is named, this does seem to fit. "But I will shew thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and there is none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your prince." Jesus is the prince of peace and none holds us but Him. So that fits.

Da 12:1 And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book. This one fits too. Who is the great prince that stands for the children of (God's) people? The mediator of the covenant; that's Christ.

Jude 1:9 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.

Re 12:7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,

These two fit too. Who better qualified to answer Satan than Christ and who better to lead the armies of the host of heaven. Revelation also portrays Christ as a conqueror on a white horse. So that all fits together too.

Where the Jehovah's Witnesses and SDA get in trouble though is where they deny the divinity of Christ and say he's just a created being, like an angel. They miss the point of both the meaning of the name Michael and also that an angel is simply put, a messenger.

Interestingly though, Gabriel means "God man". So is Gabriel another depiction of Christ? I don't know? He only shows up in the book of Luke around the time of the incarnation.