Question Protected by Community
3 Added references and my own view of the answer.
source | link

The Old Testament records many instances of men having concubines or many wives. Why did having concubines not fall under the sin of adultery?

2 Samuel 5:13 - "After he left Hebron, David took more concubines and wives in Jerusalem, and more sons and daughters were born to him."

Genesis 25:6 - "But while he was still living, he gave gifts to the sons of his concubines and sent them away from his son Isaac to the land of the east." (Abraham)

I suppose the issue here must've been consent between all parties.

The Old Testament records many instances of men having concubines or many wives. Why did having concubines not fall under the sin of adultery?

The Old Testament records many instances of men having concubines or many wives. Why did having concubines not fall under the sin of adultery?

2 Samuel 5:13 - "After he left Hebron, David took more concubines and wives in Jerusalem, and more sons and daughters were born to him."

Genesis 25:6 - "But while he was still living, he gave gifts to the sons of his concubines and sent them away from his son Isaac to the land of the east." (Abraham)

I suppose the issue here must've been consent between all parties.

2 capitalization
source | link

The old testamentOld Testament records many instances of men having concubines or many wives. Why did having concubines not fall under the sin of adultery?

The old testament records many instances of men having concubines or many wives. Why did having concubines not fall under the sin of adultery?

The Old Testament records many instances of men having concubines or many wives. Why did having concubines not fall under the sin of adultery?

    Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackChristian/status/460835011617624064
1
source | link

Why was having concubines not a sin like adultery?

The old testament records many instances of men having concubines or many wives. Why did having concubines not fall under the sin of adultery?