Timeline for What are the major views on Adam's motivation to sin given that he was not deceived? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2014 at 6:19 | history | closed |
David Stratton Peter Turner♦ Dan James T Flimzy |
Opinion-based | |
| Mar 14, 2014 at 4:27 | vote | accept | Shovas | ||
| Mar 12, 2014 at 21:44 | answer | added | The Spooniest | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 12, 2014 at 13:13 | comment | added | Steve | The Bible doesn't tell us what Adam's motivation was. However, since we are all sinners, we shouldn't have to look far for an answer. Anyway, one doesn't have to be deceived in order to sin. Christians can sin, knowing full well that it is wrong. | |
| Mar 11, 2014 at 17:45 | comment | added | Peter Turner♦ | Gotta VTC this, I'd like to answer it from a Catholic perspective because I've heard an interesting explanation in the Theology of the Body. But since you're not asking for something that can be definitively answered within a particular theological framework, it's not useful for people to answer the question. | |
| Mar 11, 2014 at 17:43 | comment | added | The Freemason | You could also ask questions about framing this specific question here: meta.christianity.stackexchange.com instead of asking in the comments ;) | |
| Mar 11, 2014 at 15:46 | answer | added | DrFry | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 11, 2014 at 13:28 | answer | added | BYE | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 11, 2014 at 2:59 | comment | added | David Stratton | The best advice I have on that can be found at Tips for editing a question to make it suitable for re-opening. And seriously, thanks for not taking it personally! | |
| Mar 11, 2014 at 2:29 | history | edited | Shovas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Edited to make this a more concise, Stack Exchange friendly, positivist question
|
| Mar 11, 2014 at 2:28 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 25, 2014 at 6:19 | |||||
| Mar 11, 2014 at 2:24 | comment | added | Shovas | Thought I might get one of these responses, I've read enough stackexchange to see that might happen :) Does stackexchange answer what the positions are? Is that a better way to frame this question? | |
| Mar 11, 2014 at 2:18 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 11, 2014 at 3:27 | |||||
| Mar 11, 2014 at 2:10 | comment | added | David Stratton | This doesn't look like a really good fit for this particular site. The question seems to be asking for our opinions on the validity of a line of thinking, which is good for a discussion forum, but not this site. This site is intentionally not an open discussion forum. I'd recommend you read help page and How we are different than other sites? | |
| Mar 11, 2014 at 2:02 | history | asked | Shovas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |