Timeline for What is the endgame for sedevacantists?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2014 at 6:27 | history | edited | Caleb | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited in content from comments (which are emphemoral) into answer (more permanent)
|
| Dec 10, 2013 at 16:26 | vote | accept | James T | ||
| Oct 4, 2013 at 16:59 | comment | added | James T | Thanks, this is very helpful. If you were to edit this into the body of your answer, I would accept it as an answer to my original question above about the resolution to the crisis, as this gives a broader perspective on the different groups than the alternative answer by apocalypse_info_click_here. | |
| Oct 4, 2013 at 16:06 | comment | added | Andreas Blass | I'm more familiar with Bishop Sanborn's position, which is essentially that the administrative structure of the Catholic Church continues, despite heresy, so that the modernist popes have valid elections (and the cardinals valid appointments) but are impeded from having the authority of the papacy by their lack of the Catholic faith. So the crisis would be ended if one of these popes were to abjure heresy and profess the Catholic faith (and, I suppose, receive ordination and episcopal consecration in traditional rites). I'm not sure to what extent Bishop Dolan agrees with this. | |
| Oct 4, 2013 at 13:32 | comment | added | James T | Thank you for this information. In relation to the group of Daniel Dolan, can you say how they hope or expect the situation to be resolved? Is it simply a matter of electing a 'better' Pope, or are there other necessary steps (eg, must the electing cardinals also do something to demonstrate their orthodoxy)? | |
| Oct 3, 2013 at 23:11 | history | answered | Andreas Blass | CC BY-SA 3.0 |