Timeline for Under Catholic dogma can someone publicly rebuke the Pope like Paul rebuked Peter?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 8:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Sep 24, 2013 at 12:54 | comment | added | James T | @Mike, I think it is highly contextual for what is said, how it is said, who is doing the saying, and why. | |
| Sep 24, 2013 at 4:39 | comment | added | Mike | This seems a good answer. Am I correct to take it as a more or less 'No' as this example was not private but public? Note: I revised the question to include the private and public aspect as Paul specifically describes the rebuke as a public one. | |
| Sep 24, 2013 at 0:47 | history | edited | James T | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 336 characters in body
|
| Sep 23, 2013 at 20:37 | history | edited | James T | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 375 characters in body
|
| Sep 23, 2013 at 20:25 | comment | added | James T | @PaulA.Clayton, you are absolutely right and this is a great point. | |
| Sep 23, 2013 at 20:23 | comment | added | user3331 | +1 Presumably the Pope also has a confessor who would privately confront the Pope with respect to confessed sins? (This question brought to mind the scene in A Canticle for Liebowitz where an abbot confesses to his underling who seriously confronts the abbot's sin.) If the Pope has the equivalent of a spiritual director, such a person would seem to have even broader ability to rebuke (assuming a confessor is limited to confessed sins). | |
| Sep 23, 2013 at 17:04 | history | answered | James T | CC BY-SA 3.0 |