2 improve formatting
source | link

For Jesus to be "the Son of God" means that he has the very same nature of his Father. How is this so? John himself elucidated it in his gospel. He wrote that before the Word became flesh i.e. Jesus Christ, the Word is already "the only offspring of the Father" and more explicitly, "the only offspring who is God as to his nature"(John 1:14,John 1:18).

In Luke 1:35 , we are told by Luke that the "holy one" to be born will be called " God's Son" because of his incarnation.Noticing the futurity of the prophecy ( will be called), we discover that the incarnate Word, the "holy one" born of the Virgin, was declared or made known as "God's Son" at his resurrection per Romans 1:4.

Now Jesus as the Word was not merely declared to be "God's Son" but in fact, he was declared to be "God's birthed Son" and this status he has was the one proclaimed by the Father per se at his resurrection( Hebrews 1:5,5:5, Acts 13:35).

The genetic metaphor of "birth" denotes that the Word is equally sharing the same nature of his Father.This is the reason why in Romans 1:4, Paul did not write "God's begotten Son" but simply "God's Son" for he already explained in the text what it means " ...declared to be God's Son with power according to his spirit of holiness i.e. divine nature ( not the Third person of the Trinity)but in Hebrews 1:5,5:5,Acts 13:35, being a quotation of Ps. 2:7, Paul found it suffice to use it as proof text for the "eternal Sonship" of Jesus because he already knew in mind that Jesus was proven to be God in nature at his resurrection via his Sonship.

The understanding of the New Testament writers about the Sonship of Christ is primarily about his Sonship as the Word, Wisdom and Power of the Father ( Hebrews 1:3, 1 Cor. 1:24, Joihn 1:1,14,18,3:16,18,1 John 4:9).

The Greek word translated "only begotten" (monogenes) is a compound word of monos (one/only) and genos (offspring/kind) and means "only offspring" in every occurrence in the New Testament, and does not prove Christ's begottenness but only his being the "sole offspring" of the Father.

The Word is the "only offspring" of the Father (John 1:14) but all humans collectively are also "offspring" of the Father (Acts 17:28), so is this a contradiction? No. John explains why. It is because the Word is "the only offspring who is God as to his nature" (John 1:18).

It is really important to know and have faith with the Sonship of Christ as taught and revealed in the Scriptures asbecause this concerns our salvation from hell per se ( John 3:16,18; 20:31, 1 John 5:11-13).

The Sonship of Christ is literal in sense and on the other hand, metaphorical in essence. The Word was not literally birthed by the Father but that through this. This is only an anthropomorphic imagery used so that we might understand that the Word is the Son,only begotten, of one nature with the Father.

For Jesus to be "the Son of God" means that he has the very same nature of his Father. How is this so? John himself elucidated it in his gospel. He wrote that before the Word became flesh i.e. Jesus Christ, the Word is already "the only offspring of the Father" and more explicitly, "the only offspring who is God as to his nature"(John 1:14,John 1:18).

In Luke 1:35 , we are told by Luke that the "holy one" to be born will be called " God's Son" because of his incarnation.Noticing the futurity of the prophecy ( will be called), we discover that the incarnate Word, the "holy one" born of the Virgin, was declared or made known as "God's Son" at his resurrection per Romans 1:4.

Now Jesus as the Word was not merely declared to be "God's Son" but in fact, he was declared to be "God's birthed Son" and this status he has was the one proclaimed by the Father per se at his resurrection( Hebrews 1:5,5:5, Acts 13:35).

The genetic metaphor of "birth" denotes that the Word is equally sharing the same nature of his Father.This is the reason why in Romans 1:4, Paul did not write "God's begotten Son" but simply "God's Son" for he already explained in the text what it means " ...declared to be God's Son with power according to his spirit of holiness i.e. divine nature ( not the Third person of the Trinity)but in Hebrews 1:5,5:5,Acts 13:35, being a quotation of Ps. 2:7, Paul found it suffice to use it as proof text for the "eternal Sonship" of Jesus because he already knew in mind that Jesus was proven to be God in nature at his resurrection via his Sonship.

The understanding of the New Testament writers about the Sonship of Christ is primarily about his Sonship as the Word, Wisdom and Power of the Father ( Hebrews 1:3, 1 Cor. 1:24, Joihn 1:1,14,18,3:16,18,1 John 4:9).

The Greek word translated "only begotten" (monogenes) is a compound word of monos (one/only) and genos (offspring/kind) and means "only offspring" in every occurrence in the New Testament, and does not prove Christ's begottenness but only his being the "sole offspring" of the Father.

The Word is the "only offspring" of the Father (John 1:14) but all humans collectively are also "offspring" of the Father (Acts 17:28), so is this a contradiction? No. John explains why. It is because the Word is "the only offspring who is God as to his nature" (John 1:18).

It is really important to know and have faith with the Sonship of Christ taught and revealed in the Scriptures as this concerns our salvation from hell per se ( John 3:16,18; 20:31, 1 John 5:11-13).

The Sonship of Christ is literal in sense and on the other hand, metaphorical in essence. The Word was not literally birthed by the Father but that through this anthropomorphic imagery we might understand that the Word is the Son,only begotten, of one nature with the Father.

For Jesus to be "the Son of God" means that he has the very same nature of his Father. How is this so? John himself elucidated it in his gospel. He wrote that before the Word became flesh i.e. Jesus Christ, the Word is already "the only offspring of the Father" and more explicitly, "the only offspring who is God as to his nature"(John 1:14,John 1:18).

In Luke 1:35 , we are told by Luke that the "holy one" to be born will be called " God's Son" because of his incarnation.Noticing the futurity of the prophecy ( will be called), we discover that the incarnate Word, the "holy one" born of the Virgin, was declared or made known as "God's Son" at his resurrection per Romans 1:4.

Now Jesus as the Word was not merely declared to be "God's Son" but in fact, he was declared to be "God's birthed Son" and this status he has was the one proclaimed by the Father per se at his resurrection( Hebrews 1:5,5:5, Acts 13:35).

The genetic metaphor of "birth" denotes that the Word is equally sharing the same nature of his Father.This is the reason why in Romans 1:4, Paul did not write "God's begotten Son" but simply "God's Son" for he already explained in the text what it means " ...declared to be God's Son with power according to his spirit of holiness i.e. divine nature ( not the Third person of the Trinity)but in Hebrews 1:5,5:5,Acts 13:35, being a quotation of Ps. 2:7, Paul found it suffice to use it as proof text for the "eternal Sonship" of Jesus because he already knew in mind that Jesus was proven to be God in nature at his resurrection via his Sonship.

The understanding of the New Testament writers about the Sonship of Christ is primarily about his Sonship as the Word, Wisdom and Power of the Father ( Hebrews 1:3, 1 Cor. 1:24, Joihn 1:1,14,18,3:16,18,1 John 4:9).

The Greek word translated "only begotten" (monogenes) is a compound word of monos (one/only) and genos (offspring/kind) and means "only offspring" in every occurrence in the New Testament, and does not prove Christ's begottenness but only his being the "sole offspring" of the Father.

The Word is the "only offspring" of the Father (John 1:14) but all humans collectively are also "offspring" of the Father (Acts 17:28), so is this a contradiction? No. John explains why. It is because the Word is "the only offspring who is God as to his nature" (John 1:18).

It is really important to know and have faith with the Sonship of Christ as taught and revealed in the Scriptures because this concerns our salvation from hell per se ( John 3:16,18; 20:31, 1 John 5:11-13).

The Sonship of Christ is literal in sense and on the other hand, metaphorical in essence. The Word was not literally birthed by the Father. This is only an anthropomorphic imagery used so that we might understand that the Word is the Son, of one nature with the Father.

1
source | link

For Jesus to be "the Son of God" means that he has the very same nature of his Father. How is this so? John himself elucidated it in his gospel. He wrote that before the Word became flesh i.e. Jesus Christ, the Word is already "the only offspring of the Father" and more explicitly, "the only offspring who is God as to his nature"(John 1:14,John 1:18).

In Luke 1:35 , we are told by Luke that the "holy one" to be born will be called " God's Son" because of his incarnation.Noticing the futurity of the prophecy ( will be called), we discover that the incarnate Word, the "holy one" born of the Virgin, was declared or made known as "God's Son" at his resurrection per Romans 1:4.

Now Jesus as the Word was not merely declared to be "God's Son" but in fact, he was declared to be "God's birthed Son" and this status he has was the one proclaimed by the Father per se at his resurrection( Hebrews 1:5,5:5, Acts 13:35).

The genetic metaphor of "birth" denotes that the Word is equally sharing the same nature of his Father.This is the reason why in Romans 1:4, Paul did not write "God's begotten Son" but simply "God's Son" for he already explained in the text what it means " ...declared to be God's Son with power according to his spirit of holiness i.e. divine nature ( not the Third person of the Trinity)but in Hebrews 1:5,5:5,Acts 13:35, being a quotation of Ps. 2:7, Paul found it suffice to use it as proof text for the "eternal Sonship" of Jesus because he already knew in mind that Jesus was proven to be God in nature at his resurrection via his Sonship.

The understanding of the New Testament writers about the Sonship of Christ is primarily about his Sonship as the Word, Wisdom and Power of the Father ( Hebrews 1:3, 1 Cor. 1:24, Joihn 1:1,14,18,3:16,18,1 John 4:9).

The Greek word translated "only begotten" (monogenes) is a compound word of monos (one/only) and genos (offspring/kind) and means "only offspring" in every occurrence in the New Testament, and does not prove Christ's begottenness but only his being the "sole offspring" of the Father.

The Word is the "only offspring" of the Father (John 1:14) but all humans collectively are also "offspring" of the Father (Acts 17:28), so is this a contradiction? No. John explains why. It is because the Word is "the only offspring who is God as to his nature" (John 1:18).

It is really important to know and have faith with the Sonship of Christ taught and revealed in the Scriptures as this concerns our salvation from hell per se ( John 3:16,18; 20:31, 1 John 5:11-13).

The Sonship of Christ is literal in sense and on the other hand, metaphorical in essence. The Word was not literally birthed by the Father but that through this anthropomorphic imagery we might understand that the Word is the Son,only begotten, of one nature with the Father.

    Post Made Community Wiki by Radz C. Brown