Timeline for Trinitarian Christianity says Jesus was fully God and Fully man. Did Jesus (the man) know this to be the case?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16 at 13:21 | comment | added | Maverick | Let's consider the other divine titles we know. They're not just random phrases ("I AM," "The Lord our Provider," "Master," "The Lord our Righteousness"); since God's no liar, they are accurate descriptions. Jesus is no liar, so when He says He's the Son of Man, He's not just giving a nonsense phrase. He's accurately describing Himself. Divine titles aren't just titles. They're correct titles (if God Himself gives them). Right? | |
| Sep 20 at 7:09 | comment | added | Nigel J | @TheChaz2.0 The Son (of man). It is ambiguous. But, yes, it can be considered a Divine title. Agreed. | |
| Sep 19 at 20:29 | comment | added | The Chaz 2.0 | Apparently not! The son of Man, not a son of Man. | |
| Sep 19 at 18:37 | comment | added | Maverick | Ezekiel 2:1, 3:1, 3:10, 4:1, 8:5, and many others can help clear that up. | |
| Sep 19 at 17:02 | comment | added | The Chaz 2.0 | Son of Man is a divine title... | |
| Sep 18 at 15:50 | history | answered | Maverick | CC BY-SA 4.0 |