Timeline for What are some arguments for/against ontological subordinationism? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26 at 8:26 | vote | accept | dimo | ||
| Jun 26 at 8:26 | |||||
| Jun 21 at 23:14 | comment | added | curiousdannii♦ | Questions on this site can only ask about one side of a debate like this. A second question can be asked about the other side. | |
| Jun 21 at 23:14 | history | closed |
Kristopher Nigel J Ray Butterworth curiousdannii♦ |
Opinion-based | |
| Jun 21 at 14:34 | answer | added | Michael16 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 19 at 15:54 | comment | added | Lesley | Thank you, dimo. It's just that you didn't produce any information at all to show the basis for your question. I see information from the answer given by Anne that Origen believed in subordinationism. | |
| Jun 19 at 15:32 | comment | added | dimo | @Lesley I read Origen and it is quite clear. For example he says: "the Son, being less than the father, is superior to rational creatures alone (for he is second to the father); the holy spirit is still less, and dwells within the saints alone". I haven't yet read Tertullian, but Wikipedia says he is known for being one, so I will just take their word - "[S]ome of his teachings, such as the subordination of the Son and Spirit to the Father, were later rejected by the Church". It is possible, however, that he was just an economic subordinationist. | |
| Jun 19 at 15:26 | comment | added | Lesley | Where have you seen evidence to suggest that Tertullian and Origen were subordinationists? What research have you already done? | |
| Jun 19 at 14:32 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jun 21 at 23:15 | |||||
| Jun 19 at 13:35 | answer | added | Anne | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 19 at 11:59 | history | asked | dimo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |