6,378 reputation
915
bio website johansens.us
location Michigan
age
visits member for 3 years
seen Oct 16 at 19:18

Oct
16
comment What is the earliest non-Judeo-Christian reference to Jesus?
Note that while #1 is pretty much all that the writer had to say about Jesus, #2 and #3 are excerpts from much longer discussions in the original. Not faulting curiousdanii here, Pliny especially had a fairly extensive discussion. Just want to emphasize that the sentence or two quoted is not the entire discussion.
Oct
16
comment Why did Ananias die?
... SOME indication that Peter was, in fact, wrong. The plain reading is that Peter's statement is true.
Oct
16
comment Why did Ananias die?
Well, I suppose. Or (d) he died of a sudden heart attack that was a complete coincidence and had nothing to do with the real estate deal. Or (e) Peter had poisoned him. Or (f) Of course non-Christians would say that the text is inaccurate or misleading in one way or another. But if we take the text to be an accurate account of what happened, we have Peter's statement that Ananias told this lie, so if Ananias made no such claim than Peter is lying or mistaken. Such an interpretation would be highly strained. Surely if that was what the writer intended to convey, he would have included ...
Oct
16
comment What do non-fundamentalists believe about the Bible?
I agree that "non-Fundamentalists" is a very large and diverse group. I'd question whether Fundamentalists are a "very small minority". Surveys get mired in definitions, but pretty routinely about 30-35% of Americans describe themselves as "born again", which is probably a large overlap with Fundamentalists. Then we get into questions about what the definition of "Christian" is to say what percentage this is of the total. Anyway, the question is surely answerable by saying "Group A believe this, Group B believe that" etc. I don't think there's all that broad a difference of opinion on this.
Oct
16
comment Where do Christian doctrines state that God, being supernatural, can never be detected by science?
A statement like "God is not detectable by science" cries out for clarification. What do you mean by "detectable" and "science"? Apologists routinely offer scientific evidence that they believe substantiates the Bible. The definition of science involves experiment and observation. If someone asks God to perform a miracle and God responds -- like Pharaoh or Gideon, for example -- that would seem to be a scientific testing of God.
Oct
16
comment Where do Christian doctrines state that God, being supernatural, can never be detected by science?
While I agree that the question has a false premise, I don't see this as a reason to close it. Wouldn't the appropriate answer be to point out the falsity of the premise?
Oct
16
comment What is considered chaste behaviour from a Catholic perspective?
Tangential note: The reason that Protestants don't "remember" the story of Tobias is because we do not have the book of Tobias in our Bible, so most Protestants have never read it.
Sep
8
comment How old were Joseph & Mary when they marrried?
Quite true, I don't think we're disagreeing. It is quite possible that Mary was in her mid teens when she got married, arguably even likely, as that was common at the time. My point is just that, to the best of my knowledge, we don't have any document from the times that says, so we don't know. For all we know she could have been an old spinster. :-)
Sep
8
comment How old were Joseph & Mary when they marrried?
Not saying that you said otherwise, but just to be clear: The Code of Canon Law was written centuries after Mary and Joseph, so would not have applied to them. And in any case, any law that sets a minimum age tells us at most that they were AT LEAST this age, not that they were EXACTLY this age. And even at that we can't be sure that they didn't break the rules, with or without some official exemption.
Jul
10
comment When is it too late to ask for salvation?
Late comment: While the Bible certainly does have accounts of deathbed conversions -- the thief on the cross being the premier example -- Constantine was not such a case. He was converted in AD 311, and died in AD 337.
Jun
17
comment Have the individual commands of the OT Law ever been categorized as “Moral,” “Ceremonial,” and “Civil?”
Classifying based on "obvious rational basis" or not would be highly subjective. What seems rational to me may not be so rational to you. The example you give is a case in point: Why is a law again murder "rational" while a law against, say, eating pork is not? I'm hard pressed to think of a rational, logical argument why murder is wrong. It just ... is.
Jun
17
comment What word did Jesus use for God in Aramaic?
To address what I think is the underlying point here: I think most linguists say that the Hebrew words "El" and "Elohim" share common origins with the Arabic word "Allah". But that hardly proves that Jews worshipped the God of Islam. Both "Elohim" and "Allah" are general words meaning "God". Consider: There have been plenty of times in history that two men both claimed to be "king" of a particular country. The fact that supporters of Henry call him "king" certainly does not mean that when supporters of Richard use the word "king" that they are referring to Henry!
Apr
24
comment Can you renounce part of the bible, and still be a Christian?
... I see how anyone could prove you right.
Apr
24
comment Can you renounce part of the bible, and still be a Christian?
I didn't say it was clear cut, if by that you mean there was 100% certainty for the books selected and 0% chance for the books not selected. Scholars had to weigh the evidence and come to what they considered reasonable conclusions. That's what I meant by the statement that you might disagree with them about some of their conclusions, I meant on documentary and historical grounds. If you want to claim that folks lied about their reasons when they said it was on documentary grounds and really they were politically motivated, I don't know how anyone today could prove you wrong. But nor do ...
Apr
24
comment Can you renounce part of the bible, and still be a Christian?
I'd say the important question is not whether you consider yourself a question, or even whether others consider you a Christian, but whether Christ considers you a Christian.
Apr
23
comment What is the basis upon which the concept that God and Allah are the same?
@stratton He's asking about a relationship between Christianity and Islam. If such a question is off limits on a Christianity site because it refers to Islam, presumably by the same reasoning it would be off limits on a Muslim site because it refers to Christianity. Unless someone creates a site just for asking questions about the relationships between different religions. And what's the point?
Apr
23
comment Were humans once angels?
How is this more "opinion-based" than any other question asking for scriptural basis for a doctrine or theory? Either one can find relevant verses or not.
Apr
9
comment Why is the Vatican against “The Son of God” movie?
"We haven't seen the whole movie but..." Okay, there's validity to that. But I always get a laugh when I read such a rebuttal to a critique of a book or movie, and then it becomes clear that the person writing the rebuttal didn't read the entire critique. (In this case I've neither seen the movie nor read the critique, so I have no opinion.)
Apr
9
comment Was Jesus present at the beginning of time? Or when did the Trinity come into being?
I don't understand the "on hold as primarily opinion-based". Surely one can make Biblical or logical arguments for one position or another. Andreas Blass and Jeremy Houle both cite relevant Bible verses. Questions on here are routinely closed on the grounds that the purpose of this site is only to discuss what this or that denomination teaches, and not what is true. Surely one could answer this question in that spirit, quoting doctrinal positions of one denomination or another. What makes this question "opinion" and other not-closed questions not so?
Apr
9
comment The Burden of Proof
... before Columbus can be tested.