| bio | website | code.google.com/p/… |
|---|---|---|
| location | London, United Kingdom | |
| age | 41 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 9 months |
| seen | Jun 6 at 21:34 | |
| stats | profile views | 118 |
Stack Overflow Valued Associate
- Contributor since November 2008
- Skeptics Moderator from February 2011 to March 2013
- Core dev since March 2013
You can find me on
- Twitter @sklivvz
- Careers 2.0
Some code of mine, mostly old :-)
|
Sep 10 |
asked | Exorcisms: effective remedy or historical curiosity? |
|
Sep 10 |
suggested | suggested edit on How to answer “Why do evil and suffering exist?” |
|
Sep 10 |
comment |
Who created God? @dan why are you obsessing about causes? Why does the universe need a cause any more than a universe Creator? Of course not. The origin of the universe is not necessarily the cause of the universe. |
|
Sep 10 |
comment |
Who created God? Nothing exists prior to itself is just false. Anything with a past existed prior to itself. |
|
Sep 10 |
comment |
Who created God? Pseudologic. Creation cannot happen without time, since creation implies a before and an after. |
|
Sep 10 |
comment |
Who created God? +1 for correctly identifying faith as the justification and not hiding behind questionable "logic". |
|
Sep 10 |
comment |
Who created God? @fir: "every event in the universe has a cause" does not imply "the universe has a cause". It's like saying: "everything in a fish pond swims, therefore a fish pond swims" |
|
Sep 10 |
comment |
Who created God? Your answer makes no sense in English: did you mean God simply "IS"? Can you make this more than a comment by fleshing up this post? |
|
Sep 10 |
comment |
Who created God? In any case this is a low quality answer: one liner, highly debatable logic, completely unconstructive. |
|
Sep 10 |
awarded | Quorum |
|
Sep 7 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Sep 7 |
comment |
Why does God not show Himself beyond reasonable doubt? Then maybe this is not the place for you: meta.christianity.stackexchange.com/q/193/279 |
|
Sep 7 |
comment |
Who is Immanuel? So you are claiming the Bible is mistranslated? In the passage cited it is quite clear that Immanuel is used as name, and not an appellative. |
|
Sep 7 |
comment |
Why does God not show Himself beyond reasonable doubt? @wha faith is not proof. |
|
Sep 7 |
comment |
Why does God not show Himself beyond reasonable doubt? Sorry, but this is completely off topic, please answer my question, and don't proselytise. |
|
Sep 7 |
comment |
Why does God not show Himself beyond reasonable doubt? If God had shown reasonable proof to humanity as you say, how do you explain that 70% of humanity is not Christian? |
|
Sep 7 |
comment |
Why does God not show Himself beyond reasonable doubt? Why do you assume the existence of the universe proof of the existence of the Christian God and not, say, the induist pantheon or FSM? |
|
Sep 7 |
comment |
How do we know Mary was a virgin at the time of Jesus' conception? Except Jesus is not called Immanuel, or is he? :) |
|
Sep 7 |
comment |
Is Leviticus 14 describing a cure for leprosy? @wik, but by doing so, you could also change your criticism to be actually constructive :) |
|
Sep 7 |
comment |
Is Leviticus 14 describing a cure for leprosy? @wik what is it you don't like or isn't actually a correct analysis? Ps, don't forget you can edit the question to make it better... |