2,633 reputation
31350
bio website
location Taiwan
age
visits member for 3 years, 3 months
seen 4 hours ago

I often chose best answers not because they are the best, but because I have to choose a best answer. Please, don't take offense to it.


Mar
7
comment Does the Bible have any proof that Jesus Christ is the Only-begotten Son of God?
@Blake: "If there are two sons, which one is supreme? Which one is God (thus, divine)?" - Why only One of the Two Sons should necessarily be supreme and the other One not? And why only One of the two Sons should be divine and the other One not? Why can't both Sons be divine? And why can't both Sons be One and the same God (just like the Father and His Son Jesus Christ are One and the same God)?
Mar
6
comment Does the Bible have any proof that Jesus Christ is the Only-begotten Son of God?
@Blake: "Since there is only one God, and the Son of God is divine there can only be one Son of God" - Why? Why One God cannot have two divine Sons?
Mar
4
comment Does the Bible have any proof that Jesus Christ is the Only-begotten Son of God?
@Blake - "The divinity of Christ proves He is the "only begotten" son of God on the basis that there is only one God" - I think you are getting here at some valid point, but I am a bit slow to put two and two together. How does the divinity of Christ prove that He is the only begotten Son? And how does the fact that there is only One God rule out the possibility that God may have, say, two or three Sons?
Feb
28
comment Does the Bible have any proof that Jesus Christ is the Only-begotten Son of God?
Thank you for your answer. It does prove that Jesus is the Son of God, and that by being so He is God. However, it does little proving that Jesus is THE ONLY BEGOTTEN Son of God. For example, your last paragraph starts: "As for your question as to whether any other parts of the Bible show that Jesus is the only Son of God, the answer is "yes"", however, later this paragraph only proves again that Jesus is the Son of God, but not THE ONLY BEGOTTEN Son of God. But THE ONLY BEGOTTEN is, in fact, the main point of my question.
Feb
27
awarded  Notable Question
Feb
20
awarded  Popular Question
Feb
18
comment Was Adam mortal before he partook of the tree of knowledge of good and evil?
@rhetorician - “Is there any reason why God would NOT have granted Adam the gift of immortality?” – Before I can try to answer this and other of your questions, I need to know the exact meaning that you attach to the word “immortality” here. As our recent discussion in the chat has shown (here: chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/13841051#13841051 ), you and I have different things on our mind when we operate with such terms as “immortality” or “immortal”. It is better if we continue in that chat.
Feb
3
comment Was Adam mortal before he partook of the tree of knowledge of good and evil?
let us continue this discussion in chat
Feb
3
comment Was Adam mortal before he partook of the tree of knowledge of good and evil?
(2) For example, you seem to be working on the assumption that the saved nations mentioned in Rev. 21:24 and 22:2 are the saints – that is, those who through believing and receiving Jesus had been born of God and, thus, already possess the eternal life. But I’ve been familiar with a theology, according to which those saved nations are quite a different group of people – quite different from those who are in the very next verse referred to as “servants of God” (Rev. 22:3). According to this theology the latter ones are the true sons of God, born of God, possessing His eternal life since the
Feb
3
comment Was Adam mortal before he partook of the tree of knowledge of good and evil?
(1) I would rather stay within the context of this passage in Genesis and not jump to the book of Revelation as when you do that, you inevitably open up a whole lot of other dimensions that are now needed to be thoroughly searched before you could make any valid and reliable conclusions.
Feb
1
comment Was Adam mortal before he partook of the tree of knowledge of good and evil?
I am afraid I don't understand you here. Are you trying to say that the tree of life somehow acquired the ability to convey immortality only after the fall of Adam, and prior to that it only had some special attributes, but not the ability to convey immortality?!
Feb
1
comment Was Adam mortal before he partook of the tree of knowledge of good and evil?
"If we assume the ONLY function of the tree of life was to convey immortality, then you may be correct. If, OTOH, we assume the tree of life had other special attributes, then you might be incorrect" - Even if it had other special attributes, their presence still did not nullify its ability to convey immortality, otherwise God would've not said "... now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever" (Gen. 3:22)
Feb
1
comment Was Adam mortal before he partook of the tree of knowledge of good and evil?
@gideonmarx - By "immortal" I mean being able - without partaking of the tree of life or the tree of knowledge of good and evil - to stay always and forever alive physically, that is, never to arrive at what Adam eventually arrived when he turned 930 years old - separation of his body from his spirit.
Feb
1
comment Was Adam mortal before he partook of the tree of knowledge of good and evil?
(2) tree (being immortal). Thus, if Adam had already partaken of the tree of life prior to partaking of the tree of knowledge, then he would've already been immortal and it would've already been "too late" for God to do anything about it.
Feb
1
comment Was Adam mortal before he partook of the tree of knowledge of good and evil?
(1) "Had they already partaken of the tree of life prior to their disobedience? Probably" - I find it rather hard to agree with. From God's concern about Adam's future after his fall and His follow-up actions in preventing Adam from partaking of the tree of life we can at least infer that the effects of partaking from the two trees are not mutually-excluding, that is, it is possible to have the effect of partaking of the bad tree (being separated from God and being aware of good and evil) and at the same time to have the effect of partaking of the good
Jan
31
comment Was Adam mortal before he partook of the tree of knowledge of good and evil?
Yes. Not that I believe for sure that that possibility was the case, but I am still forced to keep this option as possible until I am given the proof of its impossibility.
Jan
31
comment Was Adam mortal before he partook of the tree of knowledge of good and evil?
"But, the scripture is clear that Adam would only live forever (be immortal) if he partook from the tree of life" - How is that clear?! I mean, how is it clear that that also applies to Adam before the fall? Couldn't it have been so that Adam was immortal before he partook of the tree of knowledge and because of partaking of it he then lost his immortality and, thus, now needed the tree of life to become immortal again? This option may sound a bit overstretched, yet it is a valid option that needs to be rebutted somehow before we can say "it is clear".
Jan
31
asked Was Adam mortal before he partook of the tree of knowledge of good and evil?
Jan
29
awarded  Popular Question
Jan
25
accepted The lake of fire and the New Jerusalem as two different perspectives of God