meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | Taiwan | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 8 months |
| seen | 12 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 170 |
I often chose best answers not because they are the best, but because I have to choose a best answer. Please, don't take offense to it.
|
Sep 28 |
comment |
Where in the Bible does it say that Lucifer is an angel? @Wikis - WOW!!! Wikis, I just don't know how come I never thought of that! Exactly! Both me and my brother belong to the same kind as we both were born from the same father who is a human. My father couldn't have given a birth to a human and to a reptile. This logical argument is so simple and yet it is so strong! It's just genius! Thank you very much! |
|
Sep 25 |
comment |
Why neither David nor Solomon were stoned to death? @Caleb - Thank you Caleb, but I was talking about provision in the law, while what you are talking about is merely how God dealt with David about his crimes that took place long after the law had been given. My point was is there any such provisions in the law like "However, if the sinning one is your king, he shall not be put to death. His punishment will be enacted on him from above at the right time" or something like that. |
|
Sep 25 |
asked | Why neither David nor Solomon were stoned to death? |
|
Sep 25 |
comment |
What's the biggest time gap between two chronologically consecutive books of the Bible? Actually, having read this question of yours, I am quite confused now. Has it been like the content of a book would depict a time that was already way a past time during the time of writing? If so, then I would probably want to have a question in both dimensions, so to say. Which dimension, by the way, is it in the answer by Sven given below? Is it a dimension of time of writing or the one of the time of the content? |
|
Sep 25 |
asked | What's the biggest time gap between two chronologically consecutive books of the Bible? |
|
Sep 18 |
comment |
Is there any place in the Bible or any logical argument disproving the “physical” interpretation of Christ's being the Only Begotten Son? @Caleb - Okay I have just done some revision to retain the changes to the body of my question that had been done by you and Filmzy. As for the title, I am sorry, but I feel that the words ""physical" interpretation" still must be there. |
|
Sep 18 |
revised |
Is there any place in the Bible or any logical argument disproving the “physical” interpretation of Christ's being the Only Begotten Son? edit a tag that Caleb had added before (in revision 2) |
|
Sep 12 |
asked | Why did Paul say “I am pure from the blood of all men”? |
|
Sep 11 |
comment |
Where in the Bible does it say that Lucifer is an angel? that (I mean some logical sequence proving that Satan is merely an angel (or the highest of all angels), yet not like the Son of God). At the moment I am reading the material from Wikipedia that you have referred me to. |
|
Sep 11 |
comment |
Where in the Bible does it say that Lucifer is an angel? Thank you again for all these verses, but again I feel we have a missing link here. I mean logically we can't yet jump from "Jack with his soldiers" or "Jack among his soldiers" to the conclusion that Jack is also a soldier. Do you understand what I mean? Otherwise, we could also conclude that Jesus is an angel from "...when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels" (2 Th 1:7) or a saint from "...the Lord comes with ten thousands of His saints" (Jude 1:14). Yes, you are right: it is hinted, but not directly stated, so I think we need to find some logical basis for |
|
Sep 11 |
asked | Where in the Bible does it say that Lucifer is an angel? |
|
Sep 10 |
comment |
Is there any place in the Bible or any logical argument disproving the “physical” interpretation of Christ's being the Only Begotten Son? Thank you, a_hardin, so far, as I can see, your answer is the strongest one in terms of logic and relevance to my question. |
|
Sep 10 |
comment |
Is there any place in the Bible or any logical argument disproving the “physical” interpretation of Christ's being the Only Begotten Son? As for "I and the Father are One", he will say that Jesus is one with his Father in purpose (or in will), however, it doesn't disprove the fact that Lucifer, who is not one with the Father, is also a spiritual son of the Father. |
|
Sep 10 |
comment |
Is there any place in the Bible or any logical argument disproving the “physical” interpretation of Christ's being the Only Begotten Son? Thank you very much, Caleb, for all these points and verses, but the problem is that if I present all these points to that mormon he will in fact agree with them because he will put all of them (except for John 10:30) into the category of physical birth: both the only son of the widow and the 12-year-old daughter of that man were born physically and, thus, were the only begotten ones in the physical sense. In the same sense, that mormon would say, Jesus was also the only begotten Son, that is in the physical sense, yet not in spiritual sense (he would say). |
|
Sep 10 |
awarded | Cleanup |
|
Sep 10 |
revised |
Is there any place in the Bible or any logical argument disproving the “physical” interpretation of Christ's being the Only Begotten Son? edited title |
|
Sep 10 |
revised |
Is there any place in the Bible or any logical argument disproving the “physical” interpretation of Christ's being the Only Begotten Son? rolled back to a previous revision |
|
Sep 9 |
comment |
Is there any place in the Bible or any logical argument disproving the “physical” interpretation of Christ's being the Only Begotten Son? @Richard - Of course, my question is open to all theological backgrounds. |
|
Sep 9 |
asked | Is there any place in the Bible or any logical argument disproving the “physical” interpretation of Christ's being the Only Begotten Son? |
|
Sep 6 |
awarded | Scholar |
