4,519 reputation
717
bio website hartmen.us/todd
location Missouri, USA
age 40
visits member for 2 years, 4 months
seen 13 hours ago

Christian, dad, and programmer


Jul
30
comment Did Jonah die and raise from the dead?
@Caleb "Probably" in an understatement, but absolute certainty would be an overstatement.
Jul
30
comment Did Jonah die and raise from the dead?
Deliverance from Sheol/the grave is commonly used in Hebrew poetry. (e.g. Ps 30:3, Ps 86:13, Pr 23:14)
Jul
30
comment Is there a Biblical basis for born-again virginity?
In that we should return to holiness and purity, there definitely is a Biblical impulsion. God redeems his unfaithful bride (e.g. Hosea), but I don't see a direct link between that and a "second virginity." Like I said, it is at best an application of Christian principles.
Jul
28
comment What is the origin of the tradition that Mary lived in Turkey after John took her there?
@Steve, the Wikipedia article I linked claims that tradition says that John was pardoned by Emperor Nerva, though I don't see a primary source cited. Googling suggests that Nerve pardoned many (all?) that Domitian had banished, and so it is at least not illogical to think that the apostle John was among them. As for Mary, John was primarily responsible for her care. He could very well have arranged to have Mary cared for when he was banished. I suppose she could have gone with him to Patmos. My guess is that banishment doesn't have to mean solitary confinement.
Jul
27
comment What is the origin of the tradition that Mary lived in Turkey after John took her there?
The apostle John's tomb is supposed to be in Ephesus. This tradition dates to the 6th century. As John was to care for Mary, it would make sense that she lived there.
Jul
23
comment To a YEC, how does a metaphorical interpretation of Genesis 1-3 distort the gospel?
@Flimzy, I've added some links so that my opinions are now "supported," although I don't know if you'll find my support credible. These documents at least provide some means for testing the hypothesis that the text is historical (literal) rather than poetic/metaphorical. Naturally, this is not universally agreed upon, but it is a reasonable conclusion held by a number of YEC's (and perhaps others). Whether or not you can make a strong case against this assertion does not render it unsupported opinion.
Jul
21
comment What is the basis for the claim that Ezekiel 44 is about Mary the Mother of Jesus?
I don't mean to suggest that there could be exactly one meaning of a passage, but if the church says, "(among other things) this passage certainly is speaking about Mary," that would be something.
Jul
11
comment What's the justification for believing that God interacts with us today the same way He did thousands of years ago?
Your analogy (father, child) almost sounds like your suggesting that "humanity" has grown up or matured. This is debatable. It would be difficult to support a claim that human beings, themselves, are fundamentally different, physiologically, from human beings from antiquity. Our societies may appear grown up, but I see nothing about any contemporary society that could not be destroyed or lost within a generation. Is it important to your question that human society be in an, on average, steady incline (however that is measured)?
Jul
11
comment What's the justification for believing that God interacts with us today the same way He did thousands of years ago?
Who claims that God interacts with us in the same way? The Mosaic law is very different from the covenant Jesus made. What's written in the Bible doesn't claim God's interaction is unchanging, does it?
Jul
8
comment What is the reasoning behind the belief that Eve was NOT created on the sixth day?
+1 regarding the naming of the beasts. This is the only salient argument I've ever heard in support of the inference that Genesis 2 either happened later or that the whole account is metaphorical in some way and is not to be taken literally.
Jul
4
comment What does Jesus mean that those that can be trusted on small matters can be trusted in large matter?
How you define "small" is the problem with your illustration. Someone who's untrustworthy will be untrustworthy in many things, big and small, but not necessarily all things. So the man doesn't steal my change. Does he lie? Does he fulfill his promises? Does he behave differently when he thinks people are watching?
Jul
3
comment Tax Deductible Giving, is this unbiblical?
@AlexPaige The questions need to be answerable with some degree of objectivity. In general, asking "What does <group_X> say about this?" or "What is the <group_Y> position of this?" are preferred over "Is <Z> wrong?" You might be able to ask a "What Biblical support is there for <W>?" Among the many goals of the site guidelines is not having a screaming forum, and questions that rely too much on opinion could easily lead to that. I think you only need to reword your question in order for it to be answerable here.
Jun
26
comment Can we tell when the Roman pontiff is speaking “EX CATHEDRA”?
+1 for the examples
Jun
26
comment When does the Pope speak ex cathedra?
You should probably put some substance behind "clearly rejected effectively by current Church teaching especially Vatican Two." The rest of what you've written sounds very reasonable and rational.
Jun
24
comment What is meant by “atheism is a religion”?
No matter what word is used to describe someone who is not an actual agnostic, it seems like it ought to be possible to construct a sound, logical argument demonstrating that asserting even "lack of belief" is, in fact, a positive assertion about something one believes on the matter.
Jun
24
comment What is meant by “atheism is a religion”?
What you've said is a sound lexical analysis and is interesting. Regardless of what the word ought to mean based in its construction, however, the people who use the word as a label (though not uniformly in agreement) might not care if one tells them they are using the wrong word or change their position to conform to proper English construction.
Jun
24
comment What is the basis for the claim that Ezekiel 44 is about Mary the Mother of Jesus?
I agree that some of the messianic prophecies are not obviously references to the messiah. The question becomes: Who decides whether or not something is such a prophecy? As a protestant, I tend to leave those decisions strictly to Jesus and the New Testament authors. Is the Roman Catholic position that the church fathers (including all the popes throughout history, I suppose) have the authority to decide such things?
Jun
24
comment What is the basis for the claim that Ezekiel 44 is about Mary the Mother of Jesus?
I'm not asking about individuals but about the position of the Roman Catholic church. "Because the Pope said so" is, at least, an answer within the context of Roman Catholicism. If the Pope is infallible in matters of doctrine (the RC assumption, yes?) then the pontiff that made the assertion would be a part of a good answer. If he stated his reasoning, that would be even better. If Augustine is the authoritative origin of the idea (according to church leadership), then that would be an answer, too.
Jun
11
comment What is the relation between Christianity and Islam
@AndrewLeach I wasn't strictly drawing lines of distinction between Islam and Christianity with that statement. They do say "God is one" but the intent is that there is only one God. If you ask them what this means they will quickly get to the anti-trinitarian implications.
Jun
9
comment What does it mean that the “The Evil One snatches away what was sown in them.”
It's not about the label you give yourself. Rather, it's what you believe and how that affects the choices you make.