Take the 2-minute tour ×
Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Part 1

I'm referring to the story Pilgrim's Progress.

I believe it was written while John Bunyan was imprisoned.

The question is as follows:

Did he really literally dream this dream, and write it down, or was it a matter of "in a land far far away ... ?"

Part 2

(This is not posted as a separate question since I can't justify posting 2 separate 5-sentence long questions.)

Pilgrim's Progress is just filled with Bible verses everywhere (one of the things that impresses me most about the book.)

If this book was written while in prison for preaching -- how did Bunyan have access to a Bible in order to cite all these verses? Did he have them all memorized?

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

Part 1 I think could only be answered by speculation. Personally I would speculate it is simply creative story-telling, but that is just opinion.

For part 2; if we look at his earlier 1666 imprisonment, he is documented (see Wikipedia) as having:

two books, John Foxe's Book of Martyrs, the Bible, a violin he had made out of tin, a flute he'd made from a chair leg and a supply of pen and paper

So it seems clear that having a bible in jail (gaol) was no issue. Indeed, at this time it was compulsory to attend church (his crime was preaching without a license, as the C of E was aggressively controlling).

If anything, I would imagine a bible would be easily accessible, even in prison. Additionally, the writing was only started while in prison - it was only a 6 month imprisonment.

share|improve this answer
Exactly - especially at the time, imprisonment was meant as a time of pentanence and rehabilitation. As one who has worked in prisons, let me say that Bibles are very common in prison. –  Affable Geek Sep 8 '12 at 15:32

The narrator in a literary work is distinct from the author.

Since Pilgrim's Progress is a work of fiction, it makes sense to believe the narrator is a literary device, not a factual retelling of an actual dream of the author.

From a subjective point of view, I can't imagine ever having a dream so coherent and detailed, and with a well-crafted plot!

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.