Tell me more ×
Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Purely intellectual questions concerning the nature of fasting, death, suicide, and sin:

For those that die of hunger strikes, are they guilty of the sin of suicide?

For those that dies of religious fasting, are they guilty of the sin of suicide?

share|improve this question
We dont really do "Is X a sin?" questions. – Affable Geek May 30 at 12:59

closed as not constructive by wax eagle May 30 at 13:06

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or specific expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, see the FAQ for guidance.

3 Answers

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Very often whether or not something is a sin lies entirely within the intent of the person committing the act. So, if drive into a neighbor's mailbox when you accidentally swerve off the road while trying to avoid hitting a toddler who just ran into the street, that is probably not sinful. On the other hand, if you purposefully drive into their mailbox, that probably is sinful.

So the question then becomes, did they intend to kill themselves by fasting? Then it is easy enough to say that yes, it was probably sinful. If they didn't intend to kill themselves, then what they did was not substantially different from, say, using a fork to try to get bread from a toaster (gargantuanly stupid, but not necessarily sinful).

share|improve this answer

I'm not sure what the different traditions would have to say about "suicide by hunger strike," but I would imagine that, since it is, after all, volitional suicide, it would likely be regarded by many as simply a particular method to accomplish an end that many consider sinful. Whether or not suicide itself is sinful has been addressed in the following C.SE questions: 1, 2.

It's an interesting question, though, especially in light of the fact that the NT tells us that Jesus once fasted for forty days. Blanket interpretation of the Biblical exhortation that Christians are to emulate Christ could perhaps lead some to drastic, and potentially dangerous actions.

I recall reading an account of an historic teacher -- was it in Augustine's Confessions? -- that once fasted for forty days, but broke and then resumed the fast halfway through, so as not to seem to be trying to "rival" Christ in any way, shape, or form.

share|improve this answer
Wait, so this person fasted for 20 days, then took a bite of food, then faster for another 20 days -- thus having little nourishment benefit, solely for the purpose to avoid the pride of being able to say "I fasted 40 days like Jesus"? – user1694 Aug 4 '12 at 2:30
I'm not sure -- I don't even remember who it was, and it was many years ago that I read the reference. You could try searching an online version of Augustine's Confessions if you wanted -- CCEL has multiple copies, I'm sure Google Books would have it, and I expect many other sources have copies, as well. – J Bunyan Aug 4 '12 at 2:37
1  
@user131: For that matter, I recommend adding Augustine's Confessions to your reading list in any case, if you've not yet studied it -- though I don't recall if he was the one that I read did the fasting. It's one of those books that influenced enough leaders to change history, and Augustine himself was a giant. Here's a brief bio for you. – J Bunyan Aug 4 '12 at 5:26

The idea of a hunger strike exists in light of nonviolent resistance as conceived by Gandhi, who was inspired by Christianity in some ways: see http://JonathansCorner.com/gandhi/.

But that piece, "Farewell to Gandhi," sees Gandhi's nonviolence (hunger strikes included) as a deficient interpretation of the Sermon on the Mount.

share|improve this answer