Sign up ×
Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Jesus often encountered "Pharisees" and "Sadducees". For example,

34 Hearing that Jesus had silenced the Sadducees, the Pharisees got together. 35 One of them, an expert in the law, tested him with this question: 36 “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?” (Matthew 22:34-36)

From a Christian perspective, Who were they and how did they differ?

share|improve this question
Good question to ask at the Jewish SE too. – user1054 Jun 25 '12 at 17:51

4 Answers 4

up vote 15 down vote accepted

Pharisees, Sadducees, Essenes, and Zealots were the four primary religious/political factions of the time.

Pharisees were keepers of the Law and held the entire (what we would call) Hebrew Bible as the word of YHWH. They emerged from the exile as the dominant faction because they (correctly) connected Israel's abandoning of the Law as the reason for the punishment of exile. As such, they created "fences" to attempt to keep people from even coming close to replicating this behavior and casting Israel into exile and further punishment.

Sadducees were more affluent and were also more sympathetic to the Hellenistic movement. They acquiesced quite a bit to the influence of the prevailing powers (Greece, and then Rome) because they realized it was economically and politically advantageous for them to do so. They also only held the Pentateuch as their authoritative Scriptures.

Essenes held themselves to a higher standard of piety - including voluntary poverty, abstinence, and other forms and degrees of asceticism. Additionally, they lived in a tighter community (Jerusalem had an "Essene Quarter") and may have influenced the early Christian community (of Acts 1-11). Some of them took a more radical approach on this communalism and established the community of Qumran.

Zealots were just that. They believed that change could only be affected in the ruling powers through force, and likely had not real religious leader.

share|improve this answer
The Sadducees were also the group with the most political power. The Sanhedrin were composed (primarily?) of Sadducees. – mojo Jun 25 '12 at 17:08
@mojo yes, that's what I was driving toward but didn't really explicitly state as much. Thanks for the clarification. – swasheck Jun 25 '12 at 17:09
@swasheck - +1 accepted. Think you basically captured the answer - make a good quick reference. mojo comment good as well. I think it can be seen that although the Sadducees were more skeptical intellectually and had more influence in government party because of that, the Pharisees were the religious popular with their cool trends of such outward dedication. However I am sure an average Jews living in Galilee, in some small town like Bethlehem, would not have been overly impressed with any of these groups as they all seemed to break away from the simple quite holy life. Cheers – Mike Jun 26 '12 at 4:54
where to the Scribes fall into this categorization, as in "the scribes and pharisees" – warren Aug 21 '12 at 14:39
Scribes were more of a functional group than a religious faction. They were the ones who actually would replicate copies of the law. As such, they were probably more familiar with the actual semantics of the Law than any other group, and could function as teachers, advisers, and "lawyers" in the IT/NT era. They're probably associated closely with the Pharisees given the Pharisees' emphasis on keeping the law. – swasheck Aug 21 '12 at 15:10

JESUS,warned his disciples about the yeast of the sadducees and pharisees as a sadducee does not believe in the power of the Resurrection and the pharisee does not believe in the Crucifixion now if you do not believe in the Crucifixion then the Resurrection has no meaning for you and if you do not believe in the Resurrection then the Crucifixion has no meaning for you as the One who was Crucified for you was also Resurrected for you! These are the broken pieces of left overs that were in the baskets after Jesus fed the multitudes, some ate only of the Crucifixion and some only of the Resurrection but those who ate only of one or another never ate at all!

share|improve this answer

Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.

You are on the right track with the Sadducees, but on what basis do you say "the pharisee does not believe in the Crucifixion"? Who believes this? According to the Bible, the Pharisees were intimately involved in the crucifixion of Jesus and were very well aware of it. – Nathaniel Oct 12 at 16:32
Please edit to add more punctuation, and add references for what groups or individuals teach that the leftovers in the baskets represented those two teachings. – Mr. Bultitude Oct 12 at 17:03
The pharisees did not believe that Jesus died for their salvation, even though they took part in crucifying him they did it for their own pleasure as if saying to Jesus if you are Lord save yourself from h's, in other words they were saying if you can't save yourself how can you save us! – craig schwartz Oct 13 at 20:23
In Matthew 16v5-12 Jesus warns his disciples about the yeast of the sadducees and pharisees he asks them if they still do not understand, don't you remember the five loaves for the five thousand and how many baskets of leftovers you ggathered or the seven loaves for the four thousand and how many baskets of leftovers you gathered, there were 12 baskets and 7 baskets which is 19baskets that is how many times Jesus warned us about the place called hell! – craig schwartz Oct 13 at 20:38
5000 ate then 4000 ate the difference being 1000 Jesus said a thousand shall fall at your left hand, left hand being an unrighteous hand as it is only the unrighteous that can make the unrighteous fall,(sadducees and pharisees) the righteous can never make the unrighteous fall! – craig schwartz Oct 13 at 21:06

The difference between the Pharisees and the Sadducees are mentioned by Jewish Priest Josephus and also New Testament.

The Pharisees - The Pharisees, the scribes, and everyone belonging to the sect of the Pharisees obeyed Traditions of the Elders. Traditions of Elders is also known as Traditions of our fathers (Galatians 1:14) or Traditions of our forefathers by Jewish Priest Josephus (Antiquities of Jews Book XIII.X.VI).

Jesus Christ severely criticized the Pharisees and the scribes for obeying Traditions of the Elders which nullified the word of God (Matthew 15, Mark 7). That's why the biggest opponents of Jesus Christ were the scribes and the Pharisees (Matthew 23, Luke 11).

Traditions of the Elders later came to be known as Talmud. This is also agreed by Jewish society.

Rabbi Michael Rodkinson - "The Talmud, then, is the written form of that which, in the time of Jesus, was called the Traditions of the Elders, and to which he makes frequent allusions" (Source - The History of the Talmud, Vol. II, page 70, Chapter IX).

The Sadducees - One of the major differences between the Pharisees and Sadducees is that the Sadducees rejected Traditions of the Elders (a.k.a Traditions of our forefathers).

Here is the information from Jewish Priest Josephus.

"What I would now explain is this, that the Pharisees have delivered to the people a great many observances by succession from their fathers, which are not written in the laws of Moses; and for that reason it is that the Sadducees reject them, and say that we are to esteem those observances to be obligatory which are in the written word, but are not to observe what are derived from the tradition of our forefathers." (Antiquities of Jews Book XIII.X.VI).

Although the Sadducees encouraged to learn the laws of God given through Moses and the rest of the Old Testament, still they never kept it. They had their own doctrine. In the doctrine of Sadducees, they rejected the existence of the spirits, angels, and resurrection while Pharisees acknowledged the existence of the spirits, angels, and resurrection (Acts 23:8).

That's why Jesus Christ tells his disciples to be beware of the doctrines of the Pharisees and the Sadducees (Matthew 16:12). Jesus Christ also tells the Sadducees how they don't know both the scriptures of God and the power of God (Matthew 22:8).

That's why we see Jesus Christ saying this.

John 5:46-47 (NIV) - "If you believed Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote about me. But since you do not believe what he wrote, how are you going to believe what I say?”

John 7:19 (NIV) - "Has not Moses given you the law? Yet not one of you keeps the law. Why are you trying to kill me?”

share|improve this answer

The answer from swasheck is pretty good, and more than I personally know. But I'll put in 2 cents just for fun and completeness.

The Sadducees denied bodily resurrection. Which is why, as any Catechist will tell you, is why they are "so sad, you see".

As for the Essenes, lots of folks speculate that John the Baptist was one of these folks (although since he was in the desert, who knows how that would affect him) and those same folks would probably say Jesus was too. But since Jesus has a divine intellect, I'm not sure that partisanship would change His way of thinking on anything.

share|improve this answer
Bodily Resurrection was outside of the domain of the Pentateuch, so this is correct. Philosophically and doctrinally Jesus was more in line with the Pharisees which is why he's so harsh with them. It's more of a household cleanup than it is outright disagreement. – swasheck Jun 25 '12 at 16:50
Resurrection: Acts 23, Matthew 22:23-46 – mojo Jun 25 '12 at 17:05
angels and demons are also beyond the scope of the Sadducee philosophy – swasheck Jun 25 '12 at 17:05
... as @mojo just posted while I was typing – swasheck Jun 25 '12 at 17:06

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.