Take the 2-minute tour ×
Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The Emperor Constantine who favored Christianity as early as 312, and convened the Council of Nicæa in 325, postponed baptism till 337. Did he provide any reasons for doing so?

share|improve this question
2  
This seems to have been a common practice at the time -- cf. for example chapter 11 of book 1 of Augustine's Confessions. The basic principle was brutally pragmatic: Better to get as much of your life, and thus opportunity for sin, out of the way before baptism. Augustine disapproves of the custom and wonders, in roughly the year 397, why it is still popular. Don't know whether other factors entered into Constantine's decision but I suspect this one played a part. –  Ben Dunlap Jun 12 '12 at 16:07
    
Similar: christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/7877/… –  user1054 Jun 12 '12 at 19:40
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 3 down vote accepted

I do not think anyone knows as there is huge speculation on the subject.

Basically some see it as his cowardice to confess his faith, others see it as a prudent measure to keep his influence of power until the risk of his own execution for becoming a Christian had passed. He himself does not seem to say. I do not even believe we can prove He was a Christian. Maybe he was? God only knows.

It does seem though the God used Him to end so much Christian persecution, and it does seem that in some ways, at least initially, Christ overthrew the Gentile world by turning his heart in favor of His people. Quite soon after his death, Christ's kingdom grew like a mustard seed.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you, Mike. Can you, please, tell me what the "Apostolic Tradition of Hippolytus" is? It sounds quite interesting. –  brilliant Jun 13 '12 at 6:07
    
@brlliant, sorry, I do not know but am not curious enough to seek the answer. –  Mike Jun 13 '12 at 7:29
    
I just found some info on wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostolic_Tradition strange, they say there it might have not been written by Hippolytus –  brilliant Jun 13 '12 at 8:36
    
@brilliant. Thanks for the link. More interesting than I thought. It makes sense to me that this was written later as it seems 'too catholic'. I have read much of Tertullian who lived at this period (215 AD) and he never srikes me as someone with much catholic tradition behind him. Like the things covered under this 'Tradition' –  Mike Jun 13 '12 at 9:02
    
@brilliant, After reading it more fully, I did not like the article I referred to so I removed the reference and the quote. –  Mike Jun 15 '12 at 16:57
show 3 more comments

The chief reason that people put off Baptism had to do with the Roman tendency to be almost magical in their thinking about religion. Even when they had converted in their hearts, people who had civic duties, which inevitably involved performing some pagan rites, were extremely reluctant to break with tradition. And Roman society in general didn't tolerate such omissions. So, a person could only convert when he could finally be sure he wouldn't have to perform such rites.

That didn't stop many of the famous martyrs, especially soldiers like St. Sebastian and St. Vincent. But as an EMperor Constantine simply could not do what was expected of him. So he hedged his bets, kept doing his imperial thing, and on his deathbed converted.

share|improve this answer
    
Welcome to C.SE. Good answer! A reference would be helpful, but good answer! –  Affable Geek Jan 9 '13 at 5:48
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.