Take the 2-minute tour ×
Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

CLARIFICATION: For those who believe there will be an event in the "end times" in which believers will be "taken up" to meet Jesus "in the clouds", and that there is yet to be a "Great Tribulation", I am curious which scriptures (primarily) are used to support the view that the rapture will happen prior to the tribulation, as opposed to after the tribulation.

REASON FOR THE QUESTION: I am studying Matthew 24 in preparation for a sermon next Sunday, and came across the following passages (from the NASB):

"...the disciples came to Him privately, saying, 'Tell us, when will these things happen, and what will be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the age? And Jesus answered and said to them...' (from v.3-4)

"'...they will deliver you to tribulation, and will kill you... At that time many will fall away...'" (from v.9-10)

"'For then there will be a great tribulation, such as has not occurred since the beginning of the world until now, nor ever will.'" (v.21)

"'But immediately after the tribulation of those days... they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds... And He will send forth His angels with a great trumpet and they will gather together His elect from the four winds, from one end of the sky to the other.'" (from v.29-31)

Based on these passages, it sounds like the disciples asked what signs would indicate the "end of the age", and in response, Jesus described a "great tribulation" after which He would "come on the clouds" and "gather His elect". I am assuming that both "camps" (Pre-Trib. and Post-Trib.) would have an interpretation of this passage, but it got me thinking... if there was a "Rapture" before the great tribulation, why wouldn't Jesus just say something like "when you notice people disappearing, you'll know the end is here!" In other words, Jesus is answering their question, but seems to be glossing over the most obvious "sign of the end of the age", which happens before everything else (in the Pre-Trib view.)

I haven't studied the Pre-Trib. vs. Post-Trib. debate extensively, and was wondering if someone could summarize the arguments from scripture in favor of the "Pre-Trib" view. (I am aware that any passage can be interpreted any number of ways, but I am specifically looking for the most clear and convincing passages that support this doctrine.) Thanks!

share|improve this question
2  
Related question of mine: christianity.stackexchange.com/q/7044/194 –  Thomas Shields Apr 19 '12 at 19:44
1  
There are more alternatives than the "Pre-trib vs. post-trib" debate, namely the historic "amillennial" view, which is the one that has been held by most Christians over the last 2,000 years. –  alord1689 Apr 20 '12 at 14:59
    
Chuck Missler is good at providing information on all sides of an issue, I don't remember the most recent one I was watching that address your specific question on it, but I would imagine that he addresses it in this video on the rapture youtube.com/watch?v=pV7eAuYcNpE but I haven't watched it yet. One thing you have to keep in mind though is that Chuck will often present view points that are contrary to his own and if you don't pay close attention you may miss out on him saying why it's wrong. :) –  2tim424 Jan 14 '13 at 22:08
    
Earliest Church fathers were premillennialist, not amillennialist. –  H3br3wHamm3r81 Jan 14 '13 at 22:24
    
@H3br3wHamm3r81: I think that's [citation needed]. My experience with trying to prove something similar is that they don't neatly fall into any of our current escatological boxes. –  Caleb Feb 7 '13 at 15:40

4 Answers 4

up vote 6 down vote accepted

To be honest, I don't have a good answer for why Jesus doesn't mention the Rapture in His Matthew 24 discourse. However, I don't think that this disproves a Pre-Tribulation Rapture, and many other passages support it.

1 Thessalonians 4:15-17 (KJV) 15For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep. 16For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: 17Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.

Paul writes that Christ will return in the clouds to take his Church to heaven to be with Him. It doesn't mention any other actions being taken by Christ at this time. I infer from this passage and others that this is a separate event from when Christ returns at Armageddon.

John also references the Rapture. Revelation 1-3 is all about the Church ("the things which thou hast seen, and the things which are"); John mentions the Church 19 times in these chapters. Now, in chapter 4:

Revelation 4:1 (KJV) 1After this I looked, and, behold, a door was opened in heaven: and the first voice which I heard was as it were of a trumpet talking with me; which said, Come up hither, and I will shew thee things which must be hereafter.

John (a member of the Church) hears a voice like a trumpet and is taken up to heaven (paralleling the Thessalonians passage above). John now shifts to the subject of the Tribulation in chapter 4, and we don't see any more of the Church on earth until Revelation 19, when Christ returns at the end of the Tribulation. Conversely, there are many verses in Revelation 4-19 where we see the church in heaven (4:10, 6:9-11, etc.).

Another support is that, rather than the Church, Tribulation prophecy focuses on Israel, the unsaved, and the Tribulation Saints (those saved during the Tribulation).

1. Israel The Tribulation is referred to as "Jacob's [Israel's] trouble" (Jeremiah 30:7) and is the final 7 year "week" of Daniel's 70 weeks prophecy (Daniel 9:24-27.)

2. The unsaved Many verses refer to God pouring out His wrath on the unsaved at this time: Isaiah 13:6-11, Joel 3:12-13, Zephaniah 1:14-18, Revelation 6:15-17, etc.

3. Tribulation Saints Revelation 7:9-17, Revelation 9:4, etc.

Conclusion

The Pre-Tribulation Rapture position cannot be "proven"; however, it is implied by the structure of Revelation, the nature of Tribulation prophecy, and is supported by many scriptures. It is a consistent viewpoint which harmonizes many Bible passages.

share|improve this answer
    
Masterfully written. Thank you - that's exactly what I was looking for. –  Jas 3.1 Apr 20 '12 at 3:39
    
How does Revelation 4:10-11 refer to Tribulation Saints? –  Wikis Apr 20 '12 at 12:13
1  
@Wikis You're right, Revelation 4:10-11 isn't about Tribulation Saints. I must have made the mistake when I was editing and moving parts of the answer around. I don't have time to fix it right now, but I will this evening. –  Brian Koser Apr 20 '12 at 16:14
    
Rev.9:4 says " but only those who have not seal of God..." That means there must be man in Tribulation time with seal of God. Now are they 144000 jews or are they believers? If they are believers then it means that they are either converts in Tribulation or believers are still on this earth in Tribulation time. Am I right? So this leans towards either mid-trib or post-trib rapture. I'm not sure, but I would like to know are there man with seal of God in time of Tribulation? And if yes who are they? –  laovultai Sep 24 '13 at 21:35

It's a combination of a couple of things.

First, there's a passage in Matthew 24:38-41:

For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark; and they knew nothing about what would happen until the flood came and took them all away. That is how it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. Two men will be in the field; one will be taken and the other left. Two women will be grinding with a hand mill; one will be taken and the other left.

Dispensationalists take this to mean that the Christian will be taken, and the non-Christian will be left. This passage from Matthew is taken to refer to the same incident that will happen according to 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17

For the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a cry of command, with the voice of an archangel, and with the sound of the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first. Then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we will always be with the Lord.

According to this viewpoint, this is the same incident referred to in the "rescuing" in Jeremiah 30:7:

Alas, what a terrible time of trouble it is! There has never been any like it. It is a time of trouble for the descendants of Jacob, but some of them will be rescued out of it.

That is, they'll be saved from the tribulation. Revelation 3:10 echoes this:

Because you have kept my admonition to endure steadfastly, I will also keep you from the hour of testing that is about to come on the whole world to test those who live on the earth.

Thessalonians 1:10 is also taken to refer to this time:

and to wait for his Son from heaven, whom he raised from the dead, Jesus our deliverer from the coming wrath.

So these verses are all taken to mean the same time period, namely, the saving of the elect from having to go through the tribulation. All of these verses feed into the idea that we will be saved from the tribulation before it happens.

Incidentally, this interpretation was first systematized by John Nelson Darby in the 1800's. The reason it's such a popular viewpoint in America today, is because of Darby's work on the Scofield Study Bible, which was the first study Bible to be published in the United States. Since it's Darby's interpretation of Revelation that is present within the study Bible, many people viewed this interpretation as the "de-facto" interpretation of Revelation and eschatology in general.

Personally, I tend not to agree with these points (I'm an amillenialist), but having had grown up with this viewpoint, I figured I'm somewhat qualified to answer.

share|improve this answer
    
Nice. Thanks! (I especially appreciated the history on Darby.) +1 –  Jas 3.1 Apr 20 '12 at 3:40
3  
It should be pointed out that the "one will be taken and the other left" passage in Matthew 24 directly references "As it was in the days of Noah." In the flood, you wanted to be left (i.e. safe on the ark), and not taken (swept away to judgment). I believe dispensationalists have given this passage a meaning which was not intended either by the original author or by the Holy Spirit. –  alord1689 Apr 20 '12 at 15:04
    
Yes, I'd definitely agree with that. My understanding is that the one who is taken away is not the believer. Instead, as Christ said, the meek shall inherit the earth. This is when that happens. The believers are left behind, and the unbelievers taken away. –  David Morton Apr 20 '12 at 19:26
    
@alord1689, Could that passage not also be interpreted as you want to be taken onto the ark and not left off of it to face the coming judgement? –  Trebor Rude Aug 5 '13 at 12:23
    
Another thing to consider about Noah is that he faced the same trial as the rest of humanity but, with God's help, he survived it. –  Trebor Rude Aug 5 '13 at 12:31

I think Jesus does tell us about rapture in Luke:

36 Keep awake then and watch at all times [be discreet, attentive, and ready], praying that you may have the full strength and ability and be accounted worthy to escape all these things [taken together] that will take place, and to stand in the presence of the Son of Man.
Luke 21:36 (Amp)

I would say Jesus could've meant to have the strength to escape the desolation of Jerusalem, but what He says to escape from is coming upon on the entire earth. Perhaps by strength, He means the strength to endure our sinful carnal urges (as in Rev. 3:10).

"[Be careful because that day will come upon you like a trap, for it will come upon the entire earth.]" We will/would be trapped with nowhere to escape to..except into His presence.

But this isn't 100% proof there is pre-trib rapture. I think it could however support the idea.

share|improve this answer
2  
Even if you take a rapture for granted, taking this verse as a defense of it is a very weak hermeneutic and probalby does your position more harm than good. The context of the clause you highlight is much more readily understood as praying for endurance and protection during something, not removal from it. Otherwise you would have to say that it was the strenght of a person that gets them raptured. The AMP translation here is also somewhat misleading by providing multiple possible interpretations of phrases and stringing them together rather than using the most appropriate one in context. –  Caleb Nov 3 '12 at 10:13
    
I disagree. That would be redefining "escape", otherwise he would have said "endure". I also don't find it misleading. I think it does a good job at elaborating on the intended message. I would say Jesus could've meant to have the strength to escape the desolation of Jerusalem, but what He says to escape from is coming upon on the entire earth. Perhaps by strength, He means the strength to endure our sinful carnal urges (as in Rev. 3:10). –  Shredder Nov 3 '12 at 20:32
    
He says to be careful because that day will come upon you like a trap, for it will come upon the entire earth. We will be trapped with nowhere to escape to..except into His presence. –  Shredder Nov 3 '12 at 20:37
1  
There is no cause to redefine the verb at all. Look through scripture for other usages. "Escape" does not at all have to mean being physical not present for something. This word is quite commonly used in the Bible in the context of judgement ... and whether being found guilty or innocent, the person is considered present for the trial. Never does it mean "not show up for court", or "break jail", it just means that the judge rules in your favor. In the context of this passage it would then mean not being caused any permanent damage by the tribulation. –  Caleb Nov 3 '12 at 20:43
    
No, it doesn't have to mean that. If that picture of court is your basis, I'll just agree to disagree with you that it must not mean there is a pre-trib rapture. –  Shredder Nov 3 '12 at 21:00

So much confusion! That is as the Devil, the "great deceiver" would have it. Jesus made it pretty simple in His parables with respect to "His coming and our gathering together unto Him," as Paul defined the rapture in 2nd Thess 2:1-3. In His parable of the "Wise virgins" related in Matt. 25, Jesus gave us one proof that the "rapture" cannot come before the Great Tribulation comes upon earth. In verse 10 of Matt. 25, Jesus told us that when the Bridegroom, Jesus, comes for His Bride, the body of believers, the door to the wedding feast "WILL BE SHUT" and those who try to come late and unprepared will be told by Bridegroom, "I know you not." Yet, in Revelation 7:9 and 14, we see that "a Great Multitude, which no man can number" will (according to Rev. 7:14) "have washed their robes, and made the white in the blood of the Lamb." If as Jesus told us in John 14:6,"I am the way, the truth, and the life; no man cometh unto the Father except by me." How can any come (after a Pre-Tribulation rapture) to the Father through a belief in the Son (Jesus) if the "door is shut" before Tribulation? How will all those Tribulation Saint be saved if the door is shut before Tribulation begins? Thus, although there may not be one verse of scripture alone that supports Pre-Tribulation rapture, does this ONE VERSE (Matt.25:10) not deny the possibility of it? It appears that if we were to teach a Pre-Tribulation Rapture of the saved, i.e. the Bride of Christ, we would also be teaching the lost,those "Left Behind" at a Pre-Trib rapture, that they can still be saved by some other route, some other "way" than through Jesus, contrary to John 14:6?

share|improve this answer
5  
Hi James! Welcome to the site. I tend to agree with many of your claims here, but unfortunately this is not actually an answer to my question, so it is likely to be down-voted / deleted. Please continue to participate, though (and focus on the question at hand.) Thanks again for the time and effort. –  Jas 3.1 Feb 12 '13 at 0:41
1  
I'd agree with @Jas3.1 Don't be discouraged! And welcome to the site. I'd like to point out tat this site isn't what most newcomers (including me at first) think it is. I'd recommend reading the FAQ and these posts when you get a chance: meta.christianity.stackexchange.com –  David Stratton Feb 12 '13 at 1:22
    
I agree with Jas and David, and I recommend that before you read the FAQ, read the About page. Now, this answer isn't really an answer, but it's not enough of a non-answer for me to delete outright. Thus, I suggest that you edit your answer to improve it to the quality guidelines for this site. Like David said, don't be discouraged! It's not obvious that this site is not a typical forum, and there is indeed a learning curve. So, I do hope you'll participate constructively in the future. –  El'endia Starman Feb 12 '13 at 1:42

protected by Community Mar 2 '13 at 3:55

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.