Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

It's something that has stumped me since I was a kid:

  • What did the carnivores/predators eat on the Ark?

Did Noah also round up sufficient vegetation to feed all of the animals? Or did they somehow maintain the circle of life on the Ark for 40 days and 40 nights?

share|improve this question
I get really bored seeing Ark-related questions. But the problem is worse than just keeping the animals alive for 40 days. You also have to add in the time it took for the waters to subside. – Jon Ericson Mar 9 '12 at 0:50
Amen, and Amen. – Affable Geek Mar 9 '12 at 1:21
@Jon on the contrary... more significantly you also need those carnivores to have something to eat when they get off, when there are no sustainable populations for the carnivores, and no unspoilt vegetation (just flood-damaged mud) for the herbivores; given that many carnivores eat many of a single type of animal a day, this is a huge problem. – Marc Gravell Mar 9 '12 at 6:49
"This is a huge problem"... unless the flood was worldwide, but not global. – user32 Mar 10 '12 at 1:23
What subset of global is left when you take out world? – Lyle Dec 4 '14 at 19:06
up vote 12 down vote accepted

Genesis 6:21 has your answer

You are to take every kind of food that is to be eaten and store it away as food for you and for them.”

share|improve this answer

In addition to Affable's answer, there is also Genesis 9:3 which indicates that at least mankind did not eat meat before the flood:

Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you. And as I gave you the green plants, I give you everything.

It is arguable that animals did not prior to the release from the Ark, as well - they also were not afraid of men until after (the previous verse):

The fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth and upon every bird of the heavens, upon everything that creeps on the ground and all the fish of the sea. Into your hand they are delivered.

However, regardless of whether animals were carnivorous prior to the flood or not, we know that God provided for them via Noah's efforts to lay-up stores in the 100 years before the flood.

Noah did this; he did all that God commanded him.

share|improve this answer
Perhaps mankind did not eat meat. But then one must question Why Jabal raised livestock. "Gen. 4:20 Adah gave birth to Jabal; he was the father of those who live in tents and raise livestock." I think the only thing you can argue definitively is that animals were not carnivorous before the Fall and man was clearly not supposed to eat meat before Gen 9:3. After that it is not clear. To be fair, Jabal was part of Cain's wicked line, so ... – fredsbend Mar 30 '13 at 7:07
Abel (Adam's son) also offered "of the firstlings of his flock and of their fat portions" (Ge 4:4; NASB). This certainly sounds like killing animals was allowed. Would it be merely for sacrifice? It's not addressed directly, but there's at least a suggestion that humans could have been consuming meat. Another alternative is that this phrasing was used to relate to Genesis' expected audience rather than offer a precise meaning to the offering. – mojo Mar 5 '15 at 21:14
In Ge 6:19-20, there's a suggestion that God would be instrumental in bringing all the animals to Noah to put on the ark. Do we need some sort of biological reason for this urge affecting the animals that were saved, or is the providence for the animals also a part of the miraculous events of the flood? – mojo Mar 5 '15 at 21:17

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.