Take the 2-minute tour ×
Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This is something that has confused me over the years. It appears that many christians stand against the belief global warming or climate change. But I have yet to hear any biblical reasoning. I would like to know if scripture says anything to this, and if it does what does it say? and furthermore, how does this affect how a Christian should believe and act.

Thanks

share|improve this question
5  
The issue is not biblical, but scientific. There is a general skepticism of the purported science, especially after the various leaks showed willful fabrication and distortion. If the evidence were incontrovertible, there would be no need to distort. –  Narnian Apr 2 '12 at 19:06
1  
@Narnian. The evidence is incontrovertible. The earth is warming up. Ice caps are shrinking. Spring comes earlier each year. Summers are warmer and wetter (in my part of the world). Severe drought affects other parts of the world. It is undeniable. There is, admittedly, some measure of doubt over whether the cause is anthropogenic or natural, but the overwhelming scientific consensus is that humanity's actions are at least partly responsible. –  TRiG Jul 31 '12 at 19:54
4  
@TRiG What is incontrovertible is that scientists have purposely falsified data in their reports. If you have to falsify data to get the results you want, you have no credibility. In the 1970's, articles in Time magazine and others warned us of an impending ice age. There are times when the earth's temperatures average higher, then lower. That is what is incontrovertible. –  Narnian Jul 31 '12 at 20:00
    
D: first time hearing such issue. –  yvonnezoe Jun 7 '13 at 5:17
    
@yvonnezoe, yeah it is strange to me, I just heard it again on the radio, and again I don't mind if someone doesn't believe in it, but I just don't see the relationship to Christianity. It just bugs me that I haven't heard a sound biblical reason why it is opposed. –  Darye Jul 17 '13 at 7:36

5 Answers 5

up vote 15 down vote accepted

The bible has very little to say on the topic. The closest would be Genesis 9:11

I establish my covenant with you: Never again will all life be destroyed by the waters of a flood; never again will there be a flood to destroy the earth.

Even that passage has little relevance to the Global Warming issue today, as no one I know would suggest that Global Warming/Climate Change is threatening to cover the entire Earth with water.

I believe the larger question here is whether or not you believe that God directs history. If you believe that God is in control of the world, as do most Christians, then Global Warming and it's consequences are irrelevant. Maybe God intends catastrophe, and Global Warming will change the face of the planet; if so, this is God's will and mankind will be powerless to prevent it.On the other hand, maybe God intends it all come to nothing; in this case "Nature" will recover no matter how much mankind pollutes things.

This means that it makes little difference to Christians whether or not Global Warming itself is or is not real, because we have no influence in the outcome either way. The idea that we need to recycle more or become more energy efficient in order to "save the planet" is something that many Christians will vehemently dispute. There may be other good reasons to do both, but from the Christian perspective, saving the planet isn't one of them.

This isn't to say we should always act helpless. If I see a house on fire, I'm going to call the fire department to put it out. But what alarmists are talking about here is on the level of global catastrophe; perhaps not complete utter destruction, but still on the level where Christians tend to believe things are firmly in God's Hands.

That out of the way, there is also a stewardship issue in play here as well: God gave the Earth to mankind, to take care of it. It is amazing to me that Christians who would never just throw litter around will also take part in polluting the planet in just slightly less-direct ways. Of course, I am no doubt just as guilty of this hypocrisy, as are many Global Warming advocates. It's just so easy to cause indirect pollution these days; if you rode a vehicle to work or school this morning that ultimately derives motive power from petroleum or coal, even a hybrid or mass-transit, you're already guilty.

While perhaps many Christians do doubt Global Warming, it's not really Global Warming or Climate Change that the Christian faith would stand against most strongly: it's the fear-mongering that goes along with it. Let's teach our children to care for the planet, but teach them to do it because it's the right thing to do for themselves and for society (and for believers, because it's what God wants us to do), and not because the world will end if we don't.

We can also go a step deeper. It may not be true that man is powerless against global warming. A major theme in the Old Testament is how it shows a cycle of the Israelite Nation: Israel turns from God, God punishes Israel, Israel turns back to God, God rescues Israel from the punishment and restores it. This theme is repeated over and over. If global warming does result in catastrophic climate change, it may be that God is working through a similar process. In a global culture that is increasingly secular, such a calamity could serve to move the hearts of man back towards God, at which point He would restore us.

If this the case, then there is a route we can take that avoids dooms-day scenarios. However, this route does not involve conservation or limiting carbon dioxide. It's through lifting our hearts to God in prayer and praise.

share|improve this answer
2  
I wish I could vote this one up more than once. Nice answer! –  David Stratton Jan 16 '12 at 22:08
1  
If you believe that God is in control of the world, as do most Christians, then Global Warming and it's consequences are irrelevant -- By the same logic, I can say that fighting for human rights is irrelevant. In fact, that is exactly what it's saying, as global warming (if it is real) is very much a human rights issue, as it is the wealthy taking advantage of those unable to fend for themselves. –  Flimzy Aug 27 at 15:23
    
I realize this answer is old, and likely came about before we really firmed up the site guidelines, but it's overflowing with unreferenced personal opinions--most of which don't hold up to even the slightest scrutiny. I cannot downvote this answer enough. –  Flimzy Aug 27 at 15:25
    
"as no one I know would suggest that Global Warming/Climate Change is threatening to cover the entire Earth with water"; You must not know any true believers. –  david brainerd Aug 28 at 7:33

No. The Bible says nothing about global warming either way. Any attempt to twist any scripture to support or deny global warming is pure speculation.

Global warming is something that is squarely within the realm of science to support or disprove. We have facts, evidence, and trustworthy (if contradictory) data. It's a matter for scientific inquiry not Christianity.

Global warming does not predict the end of the world, a repeat of a global flood that would wipe out all mankind, or anything else that would contradict Scripture. Global warming is irrelevant to Scripture and vice-versa. It does predict flooding, but not at the scale necessary to conflict with God's promise to Noah. In short it predicts hardship, not total destruction.

As for how global warming should affect Christian worldviews (and vice-versa) the two are completely unrelated, and should affect each other no more than Brittney Spears' favorite color should affect what I want to eat for breakfast. (which is bacon and eggs.)

We're already supposed to be good stewards of the world God gave us. The truth or falseness of global warming does not change the fact of our responsibility.

share|improve this answer
2  
+1... would've been +2 for the bacon reference, but that's not allowed. –  Narnian Jan 16 '12 at 21:58
    
@Narnian encouraged by your feature request I donated an upvote so that you could in some way +2. –  caseyr547 Jun 7 '13 at 5:27
    
As for how global warming should affect Christian worldviews (and vice-versa) the two are completely unrelated -- I can't disagree with this more strongly. If global warming is real, then a Christian should have compassion on those affected, and work to help them. If GW is true and caused by man, then Christians should do far far more to slow, or even reverse, global warming. To say it's irrelevant to a Christian is to say that Christians are, or ought to be, without compassion. –  Flimzy Aug 27 at 15:28
    
-1 Genesis 9:11 doesn't exist because it would be inconvenient for liberal politics for it to exist. –  david brainerd Aug 28 at 7:35

I have heard a couple of "biblical" arguments against Global Warming. One is an appeal to God's promise that never again would a global flood destroy all life:

Genesis 9:11 (NIV)
11 I establish my covenant with you: Never again will all life be destroyed by the waters of a flood; never again will there be a flood to destroy the earth.”

Genesis 9:15 (NIV)
15 I will remember my covenant between me and you and all living creatures of every kind. Never again will the waters become a flood to destroy all life.

Of course, this is ludicrous, as global warming advocates do not actually predict a global flood. Another argument, used by a Senator Inhofe is to reference God's promise to sustain the seasons:

Genesis 8:22 (NIV)
22 “As long as the earth endures,
seedtime and harvest,
cold and heat,
summer and winter,
day and night
will never cease.”

This is also ludicrous, as global warming advocates do not actually predict cold/heat or summer/winter to cease.

I'd like to point out that even though a disproportionately large number of Christians do doubt global warming, this is due to (in my opinion, unfortunate) societal and political factors - not biblical reasoning. Most Christians would readily recognize that these "biblical" arguments are weak at best, and delusional at worst.

share|improve this answer
    
calling people delusional is a bit inappropriate here. –  Narnian Aug 27 at 14:18
    
"Of course, this is ludicrous, as global warming advocates do not actually predict a global flood." Only by taking their ludicrous claims charitably could you come to the conclusion that they do not in fact predict a global flood. Did you not watch the global warming propaganda movie Waterworld with Kevin Costner? –  david brainerd Aug 28 at 7:37

Two answers:

The passage in Genesis 8:22 is perfectly applicable to the issue of global warming because it specifically says that summer/winter & cold/heat shall not cease. The seasons will not be interrupted. Someone on this thread said that even global climate change proponents are not saying that the seasons will be destroyed...and then they go on to talk about how spring is longer, summer is hotter, etc. Interesting!

God's word is absolute. Cold and heat (meaning extremes) will continue.

There IS one scenario where the earth could warm. There's one Biblical way for the earth to warm and not contradict the above-mentioned passage. The Scriptures promised that at one point the earth will melt with a fervent heat. Could it be that God has declared it the end, and has set global warming in motion in order to accomplish this? The promise in Genesis 8:22 says that cold/heat will continue as long as the earth remains, if God sets in motion a plan to destroy it by fire, with the earth gradually warming up to a melting point, both scriptures would compliment one another.

While this is a possibility, I tend to believe that global warming/cooling is cyclical in nature - just like the seasons it's natural and has happened for hundreds of years. Either way, global warming is clearly not man made and Christians would be wise to avoid the attempted manipulation of the populace for a power grab by the ruling elite.

share|improve this answer

The purportedly relevant passage is probably this one: From Genesis 8:20-22 after the flood (_my translation, available on Wikisource )

And Noah did build an altar for Yahweh; and he took from all the pure beast, and from every pure fowl, and raised smoke in the altar. And Yahweh smelled the comforting smell, and said to Himself, no more will I curse the ground on cause of man, because the heart of man has wrong from his adolescence, and no more will I strike all that lives, just as I have done. Onward, all the days of the earth: seeding and reaping and cold and hot, and summer and winter, and night and day, will not arrest

This passage says that God will not strike down the Earth with catastrophic flooding again. So this could be interpreted by anti-global-warming zealots as saying that global warming will not melt the ice caps.

Even ignoring the fact that the whole Bible is not a scientific guide, and this story is in no way historical or factual, this story is not making predictions regarding future climate.

This passage is solely talking about the relation of God to man, and states that God will not turn his back on the descendents of Noah, no matter how terrible their deeds. It does not make any claims about whether the activity of humans can alter climate, or whether humans can cause catastrophic flooding by their own stupid actions.

Many protestant Christians in the U.S. tend to be politically conservative, and the global warming denial movement is essentially just a propaganda machine by wealthy businessmen whose business interest involves burning fossil fuels. This means that it is supported by conservatives, and by extension, many Christians. Global warming denial is a fringe position, and it is not taken seriously by any large group of people outside the U.S., nor by many scientists, nor by theologians.

share|improve this answer
11  
Wow. There are several undeniable inaccuracies here along with a lot of conjecture. First, God promised to never use a global flood, not catastrophic flooding. Even the most extreme global warming predictions don't believe the phonmenon would produce global flooding. Almost the entire remainder of this answer is speculation and parroting of a specific worldview. Your answer may be popular but it falls far short of a supportable answer per the guidelines of this site. –  David Stratton Jan 15 '12 at 13:24
2  
8  
I'm not attempting to censor you. You are perfectly free to post the answers you like. I was merely commenting on it. I did not tell you not to post it. I was merely commenting that it doesn't fit the guidelines of a good, supported answer. YOU, on the other hand just essentially told me to shut up, so who wants to censor who? I welcome supporting opinions and my love for country and the institution of country includes support of free speech, including those I don't agree with. Stating opposing views != censorship. Attempting to silence them does. –  David Stratton Jan 15 '12 at 15:34
5  
I really don't want to fight, but it was "Stop trying to censor me" that sounds like "shut up" to me. I did not open a meta thread, I linked to an existing one to support the comment I made. I apologize for any misunderstanding. –  David Stratton Jan 15 '12 at 16:06
3  
@DavidStratton - Wait, what? Acid rain was a problem in the 70s and 80s, and regulations passed in the 80s and 90s helped to limit the damage. If the 80s "hype" over acid rain is your model, you should believe that global warming is real and man-made, but that the scare-stories told about it are overblown (but the problem is still serious). –  Rex Kerr Jan 15 '12 at 16:42

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.