Take the 2-minute tour ×
Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The book of Jonah records that Jonah spent three days in the belly of a great fish (possibly a whale).

And the LORD appointed a great fish to swallow up Jonah. And Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights. Jonah 1:17 ESV

Is there any scientific evidence that suggests it is possible for a person to survive in the belly of a whale, or are we left to conclude that this was part of the miracle?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by fredsbend the Grinch, David Stratton Jul 31 at 2:24

  • This question does not appear to be about Christianity within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

12  
It seems to me that a question like this might be better suited to Skeptics.SE than Christianity.SE, since it doesn't deal with doctrinal matters. –  Mason Wheeler Dec 7 '11 at 19:17
7  
Having read Skeptics from time to time, I can already tell you what they'll say, and their contempt won't be veiled. –  Kyralessa May 10 '12 at 17:46
1  
This question appears to be off-topic because it is about the scientific possibility of a story and not Christianity, or even the Christian story itself. –  fredsbend the Grinch Jul 30 at 18:37

4 Answers 4

up vote 18 down vote accepted

Cecil Adams (aka "The Straight Dope") did a lot to debunk later-day Jonah stories here: http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2294/have-any-real-life-jonahs-been-swallowed-by-whales-and-lived

Basically, he says that while many would like to believe this is a phenomenon that has been reproduced, all the stories range from apocryphal to fraudulent. As such, yes, the fact that Jonah was preserved for three days in the belly of the whale, was in fact a miracle.

Theological Import

The fact that Jesus alludes to the same in Luke 11:32 (the sign of Jonah being given instead of a miracle) may lead one to a discussion of the difference between a sign and a miracle - but in both cases the effect is the same. It is a physical situation in which the natural human response is to see God's direct intervention. I would argue that the point of Luke 11:28 (A wicked and adulterous generation asks for a miracle, but no miracle will be given it except the sign of Jonah) specifically points to the fact that people wanted a magical reproduction. Nowadays, we are not a magical culture, but rather a scientific one. As such, we ask not for a miracle but a scientific explanation. I suspect Jesus would say of his own resurrection, that no explanation would be given it, except the sign of Jonah.

share|improve this answer

I think it's telling here that several translations (KJV, ASV, Darby, ERV, WEB at least) will use the word "prepared" rather than "appointed". That is significant. If a great fish is only "appointed" (chosen/selected), you could argue that we are limited to what can be selected from the natural world. If the fish was "prepared", however, then we should expect more supernatural intervention; it could be a species with a single member designed for the explicit purpose of swallowing Jonah. In other words, this opens the door to greater divine intervention.

Science is the study of the Natural Universe, and with the alternate translation the passage here now implies supernatural intervention. Since we have that intervention, as a believer I find the science in this case completely irrelevant... indeed, I might even be disappointed if a simple scientific explanation is found.

share|improve this answer

I think there are two options:

  1. He survived, and it was a miracle. (The whole story is miraculous, from the storm that stops, through the fish spitting him out at a certain location to the repentance of Nineveh.)
  2. He didn't survive, he died and was resurrected, also a miracle. I think this is the implication of Luke 11:30.
share|improve this answer
    
Point #2 is unlikely, as it conflicts with the teaching that Christ was "the first fruits of the resurrection," ie. that nobody was resurrected before him. –  Mason Wheeler Dec 8 '11 at 21:48
8  
@MasonWheeler: a number of people were resurrected before Jesus, see e.g. 1 Kings 17:22, Luke 7:14-15 and John 11:43-44. I think the difference here is between resuscitation (same body) and resurrection (renewed body). –  Wikis Dec 9 '11 at 6:28
1  
Also, I think it says that Jonah prayed the whole time he was in the fish, so how could he have prayed if he was dead? –  Ovi Sep 23 '13 at 21:42
2  
@Ovi - yes, I don't have an answer to that; good point. –  Wikis Sep 24 '13 at 7:39
    
to second @MasonWheeler's point, while many were raised from the dead before Christ's resurrection (he raised several Himself during His ministry), they all died again :) –  warren Dec 17 '13 at 14:01

Well - you can easily answer this yourself. You need fresh oxygen every minute, and will die after about 3 minutes without fresh air.

Would you expect fresh air in the stomach of an animal? Of course not.

But if it happened every second week, that people get eaten by whales, and come back again - it wouldn't be a miracle. But what is the function of the big fish, eating the human? It shall convince you about something extraordinary happening here, and giving the words of Jonas more authority.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.