Take the 2-minute tour ×
Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

While this question is similar to this question, I'm certain the answer will be very different, and far more complex....

How was the Old Testament compiled?

share|improve this question
    
If you ask the various religions how it was done, God told them which books to include. But, basically, some people got together, argued, came to some decision. But, when it was put together, as an accepted canon depends on which religion you are talking about, as several of them added/removed books for centuries. –  James Black Sep 25 '11 at 23:05
    
@JamesBlack: How many religions accepted the Old Testament at the time it was compiled? As far as I know, only one religion (at least at the time much/most of the OT was compiled)--Judaism. If parts were compiled later by other religions (I'm assuming you mean Christianity and/or Islam), then that would be valid in your answer as well. –  Flimzy Sep 26 '11 at 4:46
    
@Flimzy Even with Judaism, you have the Torah, yes. But then comes along the Talmud (post-Christ), which is a "non-Biblical" text from the Christian perspective. So, even the "Old Testament" from a Jewish perspective wasn't a stagnant set of documents compiled in antiquity and persisted unchanging. (Also, by using the term "Old Testament", this question presumes a Christian perspective since Jews don't call their bible the "Old Testament".) –  Richard Sep 26 '11 at 12:28
    
    
@Flimzy - When canons are still being debated, it was still being compiled, since they were picking which books to include, so that continued for a long, long time. –  James Black Sep 26 '11 at 21:07
show 2 more comments

3 Answers

up vote 5 down vote accepted

The following is taken from a section of the Introduction in the "Complete Jewish Bible", English Version by David Stern, entitled The Canon

Scholars agree that the canon of the Torah achieved its present form before the time of 'Ezra (around 445 B.C.E.), the Prophets later and the Writings last. But the final review of the canon was made by the Council of Yavneh (Jamnia) convened around 90 C.E. by Rabbi Yochanan Ben-Zakkai in the wake of the destruction of the temple by Romans twenty years earlier. Several books now included in the Tanakh were questioned—Daniel and Ezekiel, because of their startling visions and experiences; Esther, because God is not mentioned in it; Song of Songs, because of its overtly sexual character; and Ecclesiastes, because of its depressed world-viewpoint (except for the last two verses, which redeemed it). Ecclesiasticus (not the same as Ecclesiates) was rejected by the rabbis of Yavneh but is found in the Apocrypha, a collection of fifteen ancient Jewish books that include Tobit, Judith, 1-2 Maccabees and the Wisdom of Solomon. Catholic and Anglican Bibles include the Apocrypha. Some sixty other ancient books are collectively called the Pseudepigrapha. English language editions of the Apocrypha and the Pseudipigrapha are available.

There are several more pages of history regarding the formation of newer versions, New King James, etc. and the attribution of writings (who wrote which book) for the books of the Tanakh (Old Testament) in the Introduction I've sighted above. However, the passage above seems to best answer the question about the actual "compiling" of the Old Testament.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Authors like Joachim Jeremias and Gerard von Rad had shown that the origins of the OT began circa 1200-900 B.C. in the David King's dynasty, probably with the Wise Solomon. They and others are in agreement that the "David King's dynasty" text in I Kg was the first in the creation of the OT.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Since there is only one answer at the moment, I will add mine, which is from my comments.

Basically, for Christians the OT canon was still in flux until 1647 when a final decision was made as to which books would be in the Episcopalian Bible, so the OT wasn't compiled until then.

Even the Jews didn't have a unified canon until after the death of Christ.

As long as books are being added/removed/rearranged, it is in the process of being compiled.

For links to explain these dates you can look at When was the Protestant OT canon finalized?.

So, it was compiled by people coming together to determine which books should be where, and in some cases decisions to rename or split a book was made. Each group had their own reasons for their decisions, and these could be debated, but basically, long ago these decisions were argued and made, and then other groups would re-debate and make some modifications, based perhaps on newer information or better understanding.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.