Tell me more ×
Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Wikipedia claims that the doctrine of rapture was first formed in the 17th century:

The concept of the Rapture, in connection with premillennialism, was expressed by the 17th-century American Puritan father and son Increase and Cotton Mather. They held to the idea that believers would be caught up in the air, followed by judgments on the Earth, and then the millennium.

Is this the earliest mention of the doctrine?

share|improve this question
3  
It light of answer and comments below, it might be a better question to ask about the age of the idea of a Premillenial rapture, rather then just "the Rapture," which is not necessarily contriversial, though it has become a loaded term. – dleyva3 Aug 24 '11 at 16:19
1  
Over here (Europe) "Rapture" is almost unknown among Christian including (first-hand knowledge) Evangelicals. So, to me it looks to be a pretty US-centric thing. Rapture, not pre-millenial rapture. I didn't even know you could qualify it... – Jürgen A. Erhard Sep 20 '11 at 21:17
@JürgenA.Erhard I'm from Europe, too, and I disagree that it's almost unknown here. – dancek Sep 20 '11 at 21:44

5 Answers

up vote 6 down vote accepted

As dleyva3 mentioned, the term comes from 1 Thessalonians 4:17. Our word "rapture" comes from the Latin word for "caught up".

The doctrine that faithful Christians would be whisked away to be spared tribulation is a relatively new interpretation of that verse. The traditional Christian belief was that Jesus would return once, to bring judgment. At his return, the faithful would be so caught up with joy that they would rise into the air to accompany him in his descent.

The fourth century preacher John Chrysostom put it this way:

If He is about to descend, on what account shall we be caught up? For the sake of honor. For when a king drives into a city, those who are in honor go out to meet him; but the condemned await the judge within. And upon the coming of an affectionate father, his children indeed, and those who are worthy to be his children, are taken out in a chariot, that they may see and kiss him; but those of the domestics who have offended remain within. We are carried upon the chariot of our Father. For He received Him up in the clouds, and “we shall be caught up in the clouds.” (Acts i. 9.) Seest thou how great is the honor? and as He descends, we go forth to meet Him, and, what is more blessed than all, so we shall be with Him. —Homily #8, 1 Thessalonians 4:15-17

A few Christians may have had other ideas through the centuries, but the first one to really popularize the idea that Jesus would return twice—first to take the faithful away, and then later for judgment day—was John Nelson Darby in the early 19th century. That's the view that is commonly known as "the rapture" today.

share|improve this answer

I don't know how much weight should be put on this reference, but it does give different information:

It may come as a surprise but the doctrine of the Rapture is not mentioned in any Christian writings, of which we have knowledge, until after the year 1830 C.E. Whether the early writers were Greek or Latin, Armenian or Coptic, Syrian or Ethiopian, English or German, orthodox or heretic, no one mentioned it before 1830 (though a sentence in Pseudo-Dionysius in about 500 C.E. could be so interpreted). Of course, those who feel the origin of the teaching is in the Bible would say that it ceased being taught for some unknown reason at the close of the apostolic age only to reappear in 1830. But if the doctrine were so clearly stated in Scripture, it seems incredible that no one should have referred to it before the 19th century.

share|improve this answer
Fascinating source. +1 – Richard Aug 24 '11 at 15:02
1  
The reason why you never see the Rapture mentioned in earlier writings is because nobody believed in it! The "rapture" is a symbol. Read docs.google.com/… – daviesgeek Aug 24 '11 at 17:21
@daviesgeek the conclusion of that text is very hard for me to believe: "When Jesus Christ returned in 70 AD He gathered the elect of all the ages into His kingdom. We as believers now live in the kingdom of God (Colossians 3:1-4)." – dancek Aug 26 '11 at 11:05
It's because it's preterist. Personally, I do not agree with this. Revelations was written after 70 A.D., and was clearly referring to things in the future. – Cryst Aug 26 '11 at 11:08
Join me in the Eschatology Chat room. Just be forewarned: if you don't like your beliefs challenged, don't go there. (I say that in the kindest way possible.) – daviesgeek Aug 26 '11 at 15:21

The idea of the rapture is taken from many scriptures in the Bible, but the term "rapture" is from 1 Thes. 4:17. The phrase "caught up" in latin is rapiemur. It means "seized" or "taken."

See also the words of Jesus:

For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left. Two [women shall be] grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left. Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come.

Matthew 24:38-42

share|improve this answer
2  
However, this does not say that the "other left" will continue to stick around for long. The idea of the Rapture is generally mingled with the notion that there will be a somewhat long period of time between the Rapture and the Second Coming. Not everyone believes that. – Mason Wheeler Aug 24 '11 at 16:10
That's correct, this does not say anything about the "other left" The rapture does not automatically come with a doctrinal view. It is synonymous with the Lord's coming. Debate centers around when or in what way the rapture will happen in relation to other escatological events. What is debated and what is agreed upon should not be confused. – dleyva3 Aug 24 '11 at 16:15

I believe the earliest example of pre-millennial belief is Justin Martyr, but he did not ascribe to it as dogma, and was aware that others interpreted differently than him. The other answers have dealt with the origin of the concept of 'Rapture' as we have it today.

share|improve this answer

While the doctrine may have not been created until the 17th century, the idea came about probably quite shortly after Revelations was first created.

The idea comes directly from a literal interpretation of Revelations.

Revelations 20:4-6 NIV
4 I saw thrones on which were seated those who had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony about Jesus and because of the word of God. They had not worshiped the beast or its image and had not received its mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years. 5 (The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended.) This is the first resurrection. 6 Blessed and holy are those who share in the first resurrection. The second death has no power over them, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with him for a thousand years.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.